Manual vs automated lateral rotation to reduce preventable pulmonary complications in ventilator patients.

PURPOSE: To estimate effect sizes for a trial to compare preventable pulmonary complications (PPCs), turning-related adverse events, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ICU mortality between patients randomized to 2-hourly manual or continuous automated lateral rotation. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial pilot study with 15 patients selected randomly from eligible medical-surgical ICU patients from 2 tertiary hospitals and assigned randomly to the manual-turn or automated-turn protocol for up to 7 consecutive days. A radiologist blinded to group and site assessed serial chest radiographs for PPCs. Repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed models was used to estimate change in PPC score, and Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher exact test was used to compare group differences in the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 16 patients enrolled, 12 (75%) completed the study. Data from 15 patients, 7 manual turn and 8 automated turn, were analyzed. Between-group differences in PPC incidence (67% overall), change in PPC score (ß = 0.15, manual turn and ß = -0.44, automated turn), and secondary outcomes were not significant (P > .05). Standardized effect sizes were small to moderate for the outcome variables. A sample size of 54 patients would be needed to detect statistically significant between-group differences in PPC over time. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPCs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical-surgical ICU was high. Automated turning decreased PPCs with time but had little effect on secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes were not substantially different between groups. A modest efficacy effect supported reduced PPCs with automated turning to the lateral position.

The next accreditation system in radiology: a report from the APDR residency structure committee.

In a move to emphasize the educational outcomes of training programs, the ACGME has created the Next Accreditation System (NAS). The stated goals of NAS include aiding the ACGME in the accreditation of programs based on educational outcome measures, decreasing program burdens associated with the conventional process-based approach to ACGME accreditation, allowing good programs to innovate while enabling struggling programs to steadily improve, and providing public accountability for outcomes. Diagnostic radiology is among the first group of specialties to undergo NAS implementation and began operating under the NAS in July 2013. This article describes the various components of the NAS and explains the new elements, including the clinical learning environment review program, the milestones, the clinical competency committee, and the self-study visits.

CTPA as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

PURPOSE: The estimated annual incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) is between 69 to 205 cases per 100,000 persons-years. New imaging studies have been developed during the past decade. Chest CTPA, especially multidetector CT, has proven to be superior or equal to PA angiography, even detecting smaller filling defects. We reviewed the differences in opinion to the diagnosis of PE between chest radiologists (CR) who interpret CTPA and interventional radiologists (IR) who perform PA angiography and what they consider the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of PE. METHODS: Two surveys were designed, one for chest radiologists and one for interventional radiologists. An e-mail survey was sent to the members of the Society of Thoracic Radiology and the Society of Interventional Radiologists. RESULTS: IR with < 10 years since finishing training were less likely to consider CTPA the gold standard, OR 0.45 (0.2-0.9). CR with < 10 years since finishing training were more likely to consider CTPA the gold standard, OR 2.0 (1.1-3.9). Most IR performed < 5 PA angiographies in the last 2 years (69%). CR considered CTPA the gold standard for the diagnosis of PE, OR 3.3 (1.8-6.1). Binary logistic regression analysis for both groups demonstrated that the only variable associated with CTPA as gold standard for the diagnosis of PE was being a chest radiologist. CONCLUSION: The majority of the radiologists surveyed indicated that CTPA is the new reference standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. We agree with this statement based on the evidence available at this time.

Classic imaging signs of congenital cardiovascular abnormalities.

Cardiovascular imaging is a rapidly evolving field that requires familiarity with the appearances of pediatric and adult cardiovascular diseases on chest radiographs as well as images obtained with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. To accurately identify congenital abnormalities affecting the heart and vessels of the thorax, radiologists must recognize the imaging features and understand their pathophysiologic origin. The cardiovascular imaging signs of congenital anomalies that are most often seen in radiologic practice include the egg on a string (seen in transposition of the great arteries), snowman (total anomalous pulmonary venous return), scimitar (partial anomalous pulmonary venous return), gooseneck (endocardial cushion defect), figure of three and reverse figure of three (aortic coarctation), boot-shaped heart (tetralogy of Fallot), and box-shaped heart (Ebstein anomaly).

Lines and stripes: where did they go?--From conventional radiography to CT.

Frontal and lateral radiography has traditionally been used to evaluate the chest, although computed tomography (CT) and high-resolution CT are increasingly being used as an adjunct to conventional radiography for the evaluation of parenchymal and mediastinal disease. Nevertheless, radiography remains a very important modality in this context, and use of chest radiography alone can provide a vast amount of useful information. This information is derived from the configurations and interrelationships of the anatomic structures in the lung, mediastinum, and pleura and forms the basis of the "lines and stripes" concept, which plays a valuable role in establishing a diagnosis before proceeding to CT. The inability to recognize that a chest radiograph is abnormal owing to displacement of one of these lines or stripes may lead to failure to request a potentially valuable CT examination. Radiologists must be familiar with the anatomic basis of these mediastinal lines and stripes and be able to recognize their normal and abnormal appearances. In this way, they can develop an appropriate differential diagnosis prior to obtaining additional information with chest CT.

ICU chest radiographs - ICU calamities: evaluation of the portable chest radiograph.

Familiarity with anatomy and anatomic variants, with tubes and catheters and their correct positioning, as well as complications of these positionings, is critical for the radiologist interpreting plain film radiographs taken in the intensive care unit.