Case Report: Midshaft clavicle fracture with concomitant high grade (Type V) acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Introduction: Concomitant acromioclavicular joint dislocation and midshaft clavicle fracture are rare injuries, generally resulting from high energy trauma, with limited previous experience in management. Case: A 30 year old male presented following a pushbike accident. He had suffered a head on collision with another cyclist. Radiographic examination demonstrated a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture with a Rockwood Type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Operative management was undertaken using a dual plating technique. At six month follow up the patient demonstrated full range of motion and had no pain. Conclusion: Appropriate radiographic evaluation and careful intraoperative assessment are required using the principles of management for acromioclavicular joint injuries, along with stabilization of the mid-clavicular fracture to reduce the risk of non-union.

Distal radial fractures in children: risk factors for redisplacement following closed reduction.

BACKGROUND: Distal radial fractures represent one of the most common fractures in children with the majority treated by closed reduction and cast application. Redisplacement after manipulation can occur resulting in potential poor outcome. We performed a prospective study of children undergoing closed reduction of distal radial fracture and evaluated a range of possible risk factors contributing to loss of reduction. METHODS: The prospective study included 135 displaced distal radial fractures. There were 48 girls (36%) and 87 boys (64%), with a mean age of 9.9 years (range, 3 to 17 y). The risk factors for redisplacement, which were evaluated, were age, sex, location of the fracture, preoperative fracture displacement, presence of ulna fracture, grade of surgeon, quality of reduction, quality of plaster, and residual postreduction displacement. RESULTS: Redisplacement occurred in 39 of 135 cases (28.8%). Initial complete displacement was the most important risk factor for loss of reduction (odds ratio, 6.94; P=0.001). Completely displaced fractures were 7 times more likely to redisplace than fractures with some bony contact or no translation. Achievement of anatomic reduction decreases the risk of redisplacement (odds ratio, 0.29; P=0.046). Ten of the 39 fractures that lost position needed a second procedure (7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Completely displaced distal radial fractures that cannot be anatomically reduced have a high risk of redisplacement after closed reduction. Only a small number of fractures that lose reduction will require a second intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

A randomized controlled trial of 2 methods of immobilizing torus fractures of the distal forearm.

OBJECTIVES: Immobilization of torus fractures of the distal forearm, for 1 to 4 weeks in a slab, cast, or splint, produces good radiological and functional outcomes. This study assesses the pain associated with 2 forms of immobilization used for these injuries. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial comparing fiberglass volar slab and encircling plaster-of-paris cast was conducted at a children's hospital emergency department. Patients presenting with torus fractures of the distal forearm were enrolled and reviewed after 2 weeks of immobilization. A daily questionnaire was used during immobilization to assess pain, satisfaction, and activity state of the child. RESULTS: Adequate data were available for 42 participants in each group. Immobilization in a volar slab was associated with the following: increased duration of pain, with a median of 6.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-11.0) versus 3.0 days (2.0-5.0) P = 0.009, and an increased time to resumption of normal activity at 2 weeks 67% versus 95%, P = 0.001. Average daily pain severity was similar in the 2 groups (35 mm on visual analogue scale [VAS] for the cast group vs. 39 mm for the slab group), P = 0.48. Stratified analysis showed pain on enrollment of greater than 50 mm on VAS, which was a strong association for longer duration of pain in both groups, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a slab may increase the duration of pain, especially in patients who had more severe pain at presentation.