[The use of lived experiences among psychiatrists: a qualitative empirical exploration]. / Gebruik van ervaringskennis onder psychiaters; kwalitatieve empirische verkenning.

BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists generally make little use of lived experiences in addition to clinical and scientific knowledge, even while its use may make services more humane. AIM: This study aims to explore psychiatrists’ lived experience perspectives and their considerations when integrating the personal into the professional domain. METHODS: As part of a qualitative participatory research approach, peer supervision sessions were followed for 2 years and additional interviews and a focus group were organised which were then analysed thematically. RESULTS: The participating psychiatrists had three main considerations for using their own experiences in clinical practice: personal, professional and clinical relevance. We identified 11 facilitating and 9 hindering factors in working with lived experiences related to clinical practice. In addition to the high workload and responsibility as a practitioner, a barrier is the lack of experience and recognition of this as a type of knowledge within the profession, including misconceptions about possible harmful effects. Facilitating factors included the opportunity to share with peers, a warm working relationship with patients and being able to create openness and destigmatisation among colleagues. CONCLUSION: Psychiatrists appreciated the integration of lived experiences into the professional domain, even though still in its infancy. The peer supervision setting in this study was experienced as a safe space to share personal experiences with vulnerability and explore how they can harness lived experiences in the work context.

[Resident psychiatrists in Amsterdam recognize the value of personal therapy]. / De waardering van leertherapie door psychiaters in opleiding in Amsterdam.

BACKGROUND: Resident psychiatrists in the Netherlands, unlike their counterparts in other countries, are obliged to undergo 50 hours of personal psychotherapy. In 1994 Trijsburg et al. published the results of a questionnaire that had been completed by psychiatrists, psychologists and other persons training to become psychotherapists. AIM: To fnd out how resident psychiatrists in Amsterdam in 2003 characterised and rated the therapy module in their course. METHOD: Resident psychiatrists in Amsterdam were asked to complete a shortened version of the 1994 questionnaire. The Utrecht Burn-out Scale was added. RESULTS: Personal therapy was greatly appreciated, but the psychotherapists were more convinced of the positive effects than were the residents. Hardly anyone referred to any negative aspects. The residents did not consider personal therapy to be an essential element in their course. Two-thirds of the residents in Amsterdam were female, a large increase compared to the male-female ratio in 1994. The workload of the residents was in accordance with that of other workers in the health care sector. CONCLUSION: Since resident psychiatrists in Amsterdam have a positive attitude to compulsory personal therapy, there seems to be no compelling reasonfor abolishing this module--even though the beneficial effects of this therapy have never been demonstrated.