RESUMEN
The effect of the health insurance type on the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients in Colombia and Latin America is poorly known. We aimed to analyze the characteristics of HF patients that participated in the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA) as stated by their health insurance type and their relationship with the immediate prognosis of these patients. Patients with HF diagnosis were included in the RECOLFACA registry between 2017-2019. The registry was conducted in 60 centers in Colombia. All-cause mortality was the principal outcome. To evaluate the impact of health insurance on mortality, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival probabilities according to insurance type. All statistical analyses were two-tailed and were considered significant with a p value < 0.05. Of the 2,528 participants enrolled in the registry, 99% held details about their health insurance. Of those, 897 patients (35.6%) were covered by public insurance. These patients were significantly younger, with a lower proportion of men, more frequently from rural origin, and lower prevalence of most comorbidities (omitting hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and Chagas disease) than those with private insurance. Furthermore, patients with public insurance had a worse functional class, as well as a poorer quality of life, and lower frequency of use of implantable devices, while exhibiting similar prescription rates of triple medical therapy for HF. Finally, no differences in short-term mortality were observed between the two groups (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.79, 1.51). The type of health insurance represents a condition related with relevant differences in the profile of patients with HF in Colombia. Despite this, no significant differences were detected in the short-term prognosis of these patients based on the type of health insurance.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although several guidelines recommend that patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) be treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), there are still several gaps in their prescription and dosage in Colombia. This study aimed to describe the use patterns of HFrEF treatments in the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA). METHODS: Patients with HFrEF enrolled in RECOLFACA during 2017-2019 were included. Heart failure (HF) medication prescription and daily dose were assessed using absolute numbers and proportions. Therapeutic schemes of patients treated by internal medicine specialists were compared with those treated by cardiologists. RESULTS: Out of 2,528 patients in the registry, 1,384 (54.7%) had HFrEF. Among those individuals, 88.9% were prescribed beta-blockers, 72.3% with ACEI/ARBs, 67.9% with MRAs, and 13.1% with ARNIs. Moreover, less than a third of the total patients reached the target doses recommended by the European HF guidelines. No significant differences in the therapeutic schemes or target doses were observed between patients treated by internal medicine specialists or cardiologists. CONCLUSION: Prescription rates and target dose achievement are suboptimal in Colombia. Nevertheless, RECOLFACA had one of the highest prescription rates of beta-blockers and MRAs compared to some of the most recent HF registries. However, ARNIs remain underprescribed. Continuous registry updates can improve the identification of patients suitable for ARNI and SGLT2i therapy to promote their use in clinical practice.