PRONOUNCE: randomized, open-label, phase III study of first-line pemetrexed + carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients ith advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: PRONOUNCE compared the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed+carboplatin followed by pemetrexed (Pem+Cb) with paclitaxel+carboplatin+bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab (Pac+Cb+Bev) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients ≥18 years of age with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer v7.0), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 were randomized (1:1) to four cycles of induction Pem+Cb (pemetrexed, 500 mg/m, carboplatin, area under the curve = 6) followed by Pem maintenance or Pac+Cb+Bev (paclitaxel, 200 mg/m, carboplatin, area under the curve = 6, and bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg) followed by Bev maintenance in the absence of progressive disease or discontinuation. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS). Secondary end points were PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Resource utilization was also assessed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the patients randomized to Pem+Cb (N = 182) and Pac+Cb+Bev (N = 179) were well balanced between the arms. Median (months) G4PFS was 3.91 for Pem+Cb and 2.86 for Pac+Cb+Bev (hazard ratio = 0.85, 90% confidence interval, 0.7-1.04; p = 0.176); PFS, OS, ORR, or DCR did not differ significantly between the arms. Significantly more drug-related grade 3/4 anemia (18.7% versus 5.4%) and thrombocytopenia (24.0% versus 9.6%) were reported for Pem+Cb. Significantly more grade 3/4 neutropenia (48.8% versus 24.6%), grade 1/2 alopecia (28.3% versus 8.2%), and grade 1/2 sensory neuropathy were reported for Pac+Cb+Bev. Number of hospitalizations and overall length of stay did not differ significantly between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Pem+Cb did not produce significantly better G4PFS compared with Pac+Cb+Bev. Pem+Cb was not superior in PFS, OS, ORR, or DCR compared with Pac+Cb+Bev. Both regimens were well tolerated, although, toxicity profiles differed.

Treatment rationale and study design for a randomized trial of pemetrexed/carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of nonsquamous histology.

Herein we describe a companion ongoing randomized phase III study in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced disease will be randomized to receive either pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed (arm A) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 6 plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg for 4 cycles followed by maintenance bevacizumab (arm B). Cycles are 3 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS)without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS) and will test the hypothesis that G4PFS is superior for the pemetrexed-containing combination. This type of endpoint has been used previously in clinical trials in which survival outcomes have been shown to be similar between treatment regimens; thus, a regimen that reduces the risk of toxicity is clinically relevant, particularly in the palliative setting. The study will enroll approximately 360 patients (180 per arm), allowing for a 10% drop-out. Assuming a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, this study will have an 80% statistical power to detect superiority of arm A over arm B with the use of a 1-sided log-rank test and a type I error of 0.05. If the true median G4PFS for arm B is 3 months, then the HR of 0.75 equals approximately 1 month of improvement in median G4PFS for arm A. A gatekeeper strategy will be used to sequentially test PFS. This strategy will preserve the overall type I error rate when conducting statistical tests on both G4PFS and PFS.