Effect of weaning regimen on energy profiles and reproductive performance of beef cows.

The effect of shifting calf-weaning age on profiles of energy status (BW, BCS, and rib and rump fat) and reproductive performance of beef cows was evaluated in a 3-yr study. Pregnant and lactating crossbred beef cows (n = 408), mainly of Angus and Hereford breeding, were stratified by age and by sex and BW of their calves and assigned randomly into 2 treatments: weaning at approximately 180 d (early weaning) and normal weaning 45 d later (control). Cows were managed together on native range pastures and supplemented with harvested forage during the winter months. Cow BW, BCS, rib fat, and rump fat were measured periodically from early weaning through the next breeding. Reproductive performance was evaluated by calving intervals (CI), days from initiation of breeding to calving (BCI), retention in the herd, and adjusted 205-d weaning BW of the subsequent calf. Early weaned cows had greater (P < 0.001) BW at normal weaning than control cows, but the overall pattern of cow BW did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatments. Peak and nadir BCS occurred at precalving and postcalving periods, respectively and were greater (P < 0.001) at each period in early weaned than in control cows and in cows > or =5-yr-old than in younger cows. Patterns for rib fat and rump fat were nearly identical to those of BCS except for the 3-way interaction (P < 0.001) of treatment, age, and period on rump fat. Mean CI (372.4 +/- 2.1 d) and BCI (299.7 +/- 1.9 d) were not affected (P = 0.42) by treatment but varied (P < 0.001) with age of the cow. Age of cow accounted for 16% of total variation in CI and 12% of total variation in gestation length (P < 0.001). The intervals were longer (P < 0.001) in primiparous cows than in older cows. Early weaning decreased risk of culling in cows and thereby increased (P < 0.05) overall persistence by 11% over control cows. Earlier weaning of cows in the previous year increased (P < 0.001) weaning weight of the subsequent calf by 8.6 kg per cow per yr. Shifting weaning time increased storage of consumed energy as evidenced by increased rump fat, for use later during high-energy demand, ultimately improving overall productivity of the cow-calf system.

Evaluation in Appalachian pasture systems of the 1996 (update 2000) National Research Council model for weaning cattle.

This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the National Research Council's (2000) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle computer model when used to predict calf performance during on-farm pasture or dry-lot weaning and backgrounding. Calf performance was measured on 22 farms in 2002 and 8 farms in 2003 that participated in West Virginia Beef Quality Assurance Sale marketing pools. Calves were weaned on pasture (25 farms) or dry-lot (5 farms) and fed supplemental hay, haylage, ground shell corn, soybean hulls, or a commercial concentrate. Concentrates were fed at a rate of 0.0 to 1.5% of BW. The National Research Council (2000) model was used to predict ADG of each group of calves observed on each farm. The model error was measured by calculating residuals (the difference between predicted ADG minus observed ADG). Predicted animal performance was determined using level 1 of the model. Results show that, when using normal on-farm pasture sampling and forage analysis methods, the model error for ADG is high and did not accurately predict the performance of steers or heifers fed high-forage pasture-based diets; the predicted ADG was lower (P < 0.05) than the observed ADG. The estimated intake of low-producing animals was similar to the expected DMI, but for the greater-producing animals it was not. The NRC (2000) beef model may more accurately predict on-farm animal performance in pastured situations if feed analysis values reflect the energy value of the feed, account for selective grazing, and relate empty BW and shrunk BW to NDF.

Phenotypic relationships of scrotal circumference to frame size and body weight in performance-tested bulls.

The objective of this study was to determine if frame size (height) is related to scrotal circumference. A total of 695 bulls (425 Angus, 65 Hereford, 70 Charolais, 135 Simmentals) were tested for postweaning gain in five stations over a period of 1 to 3 years. Variables examined included hip height, weight and scrotal circumference at beginning and completion of a 140-d feeding period. Correlations among these traits, adjusted for age (7 to 10 months at entry), year, station and management were estimated for each breed. Both height and weight were correlated positively with scrotal circumference at the start and the end of the test period in all four breeds. When height and scrotal circumference were adjusted for weight, correlations were negligible, with the exception of end-of-test values for Charolais bulls (-0.26). Negative correlations were obtained between the scrotal circumference at the start of the test and the change in height during the test after adjustment for weight in Angus bulls (-0.18) and in Charolais bulls (-0.15). These small negative phenotypic relationships indicate that a bull's fertility is not seriously reduced by large frame size at the completion of a feedlot performance test. For maximum fertility in bulls, scrotal circumference needs to be evaluated independently of frame size.