Resuming post living donor liver transplantation in the COVID-19 pandemic: real-life experience, single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplantation (SOT) service has been disrupted during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which deferred the service in most centers worldwide. As the pandemic persists, there will be an urgency to identify the best and safest practices for resuming activities as areas re-open. Resuming activity is a difficult issue, in particular, the decision of reopening after a period of slowing down or complete cessation of activities. OBJECTIVES: To share our experience in resuming living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Liver Transplantation Unit of El-Manial Specialized Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt, and to review the obstacles that we have faced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is a single-center study. We resumed LDLT by the 26th of August 2020 after a period of closure from the 1st of March 2020. We have taken a lot of steps in order to prevent COVID-19 transmission among transplant patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). RESULTS: In our study, we reported three LDLT recipients, once resuming the transplantation till now. All our recipients and donors tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by nasopharyngeal RT-PCR a day before the transplantation. Unfortunately, one of them developed COVID-19 infection. We managed rapidly to isolate him in a single room, restricting one team of HCWs to deal with him with strict personal protective measures. Finally, the patient improved and was discharged in a good condition. The second patient ran a smooth course apart from FK neurotoxicity which improved with proper management. The third patient experienced a sharp rise in bilirubin and transaminases on day 14 that was attributed to drug toxicity vs. rejection and managed by discontinuing the offending drugs and pulse steroids. In addition, one of our head nurses tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 that was manageable with self-isolation. CONCLUSION: Careful patient, donor, personnel screening is mandatory. Adequate supply of personal protective equipments, effective infection control policies, and appropriate administrative modifications are needed for a safe return of LDLT practice.

Early Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Portal Venous Flow: a Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an infrequent, yet potentially lethal, complication of bariatric surgery. The aim of this prospective, non-randomized, cohort study is to compare between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) in terms of their early postoperative effects on portal venous flow and patency. METHODS: Forty-nine morbidly obese patients were allocated to one of 2 groups (A or B). Group A patients underwent LSG, whereas group B patients underwent LOAGB. Portal venous Doppler ultrasound scanning was performed preoperatively and 2 weeks postoperatively in all cases, in order to assess the portal venous flow (PVF) in terms of flow direction and peak systolic velocity (PSV); as well as to assess the portal venous patency and exclude PVT. The mean change in PSV (ΔPSV) and the mean percentage change in PSV (%ΔPSV) were determined in both groups. RESULTS: In all cases (group A (n = 26); group B (n = 23)), the direction of PVF was "hepatopetal" both preoperatively and 2 weeks postoperatively. The mean ΔPSV and the mean %ΔPSV were higher in LSG patients "group A" (- 0.84 cm/s and 3.25% respectively) compared with LOAGB patients "group B"(- 0.06 cm/s and 0.27% respectively); P = 0.038 and 0.039 respectively. The mean change in PSV was in the negative direction in both groups, i.e., "deceleration." No cases of PVT were reported in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is associated with greater reduction in portal venous peak systolic flow velocity in the early postoperative period, compared with laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass.

Management of early hepatic artery thrombosis following living-donor liver transplantation: feasibility, efficacy and potential risks of endovascular therapy in the first 48 hours post-transplant-a retrospective cohort study.

This retrospective cohort study aims to review our 18-year experience with early hepatic artery thrombosis (e-HAT) following living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), as well as to assess the feasibility, efficacy and potential risks of endovascular management of e-HAT in the first 48 hours (hrs) post-LDLT. Medical records of 730 patients who underwent LDLT were retrospectively reviewed. In all cases who had developed e-HAT, treatment modalities employed and their outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-one patients developed e-HAT(4.2%). Definite technical success and 1-year survival rates of surgical revascularization[11/31 cases(35.5%)] were 72.7% & 72.7%, whereas those of endovascular therapy[27/31 cases(87.1%)] were 70.4% & 59.3%, respectively. Endovascular therapy was carried out in the first 48hrs post-transplant in 9/31 cases(29%) [definite technical success:88.9%, 1-year survival:55.6%]. Four procedure-related complications were reported in 3 of those 9 cases(33.3%). In conclusion, post-LDLT e-HAT can be treated by surgical revascularization or endovascular therapy, with comparable results. Endovascular management of e-HAT in the first 48hrs post-LDLT appears to be feasible and effective, but is associated with a relatively higher risk of procedure-related complications, compared to surgical revascularization. Hence, it can be reserved as a second-line therapeutic option in certain situations where surgical revascularization is considered futile, potentially too complex, or potentially more risky.

Bile Gastritis Following Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Pilot Study to Assess Significance of Bilirubin Level in Gastric Aspirate.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB) is increasingly performed for morbidly obese patients. AIM OF WORK: This pilot study aims primarily at evaluating the incidence of bile gastritis after SAGB. The occurrence of reflux oesophagitis and reflux symptoms were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 20 patients having no reflux symptoms. All patients underwent a SAGB as a primary bariatric procedure by a single surgeon. Patients included consented to have an upper GI endoscopy done at 6 months postoperatively. Gastric aspirate was sent for bilirubin level assessment. Gastric and esophageal biopsies were submitted for histopathology and campylobacter-like organism (CLO) test. RESULTS: In our study, the rate of bile gastritis was 30%. In 18 patients, the level of bilirubin in gastric aspirate seems to be related to the degree of mucosal inflammation. The remaining two patients had microscopic moderate to severe gastritis with normal aspirate bilirubin level. Two patients with bilirubin level in aspirate more than 20 mg/dl had severe oesophagitis, gastritis with erosions, and metaplasia. Relationship between bilirubin level and histopathological findings of gastric biopsy examination was statistically significant with a P value of 0.001. CONCLUSION: The incidence of bile gastritis in this cohort is higher than reported in the literature, and this may be worrying. The correlation between endoscopic findings and patients' symptoms is poor. Bilirubin level and pH in aspirate might be useful tools to confirm alkaline reflux. Its level might help to choose candidates for revision surgery after SAGB. This needs further validation with larger sample size.

Biliary Complications in Recipients of Living-Donor Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Review of 120 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Biliary complications are common after living-donor liver transplant. This retrospective study reviewed our experience with biliary complications in recipients of living-donor liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over our 9-year study period, 120 patients underwent living-donor liver transplant. Patients were divided into 2 groups, with group A having biliary complications and group B without biliary complications. Both groups were compared, and different treatment modalities for biliary complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Group A included 45 patients (37.5%), whereas group B included 75 patients (62.5%). Biliary complications included bile leak in 17 patients (14.2%), biliary stricture in 11 patients (9.2%), combined biliary stricture with bile leak in 15 patients (12.5%), and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and cholangitis in 1 patient each (0.8%). Cold ischemia time was significantly longer in group A (P = .002). External biliary drainage was less frequently used in group A (P = .031). Technical success rates of endoscopic biliary drainage and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage were 68.3% and 41.7%. Survival rate following relaparotomy for biliary complications was 62.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Graft ischemia is an important risk factor for biliary complications. Bile leaks can predispose to anastomotic strictures. The use of external biliary drainage seems to reduce the incidence of biliary complications. Endoscopic and percutaneous trans-hepatic approaches can successfully treat more than two-thirds of biliary complications. Relaparotomy can improve survival outcomes and is usually reserved for patients with intractable biliary complications.

A portal pressure cut-off of 15 versus a cut-off of 20 for prevention of small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: A comparative study.

AIM: Portal hypertension has recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (A-LDLT). The aim of our study is to compare the portal venous pressure (PVP) cut-off values of 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg in terms of prevention of SFSS in A-LDLT. METHODS: Seventy-six patients underwent A-LDLT. A PVP <20 mmHg at the end of the operation was targeted using graft inflow modulation. Patients were divided into two groups: group A, final PVP <15 mmHg; and group B, final PVP 15-19 mmHg. Peak serum bilirubin and peak international normalized ratio in the first month after A-LDLT, as well as hepatic encephalopathy, SFSS, 90-day morbidity, and mortality were observed in both groups. RESULTS: Final PVP was well controlled below 20 mmHg in all patients (group A, n = 39; group B, n = 37). Six patients suffered SFSS in group B (16.2%) compared to one patient (2.6%) in group A (P = 0.04). Nine patients died in group B (24.3%), four of whom died of SFSS, compared to three patients in group A (7.7%) (P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: A PVP cut-off of 15 mmHg seems to be a more appropriate target level than a cut-off of 20 mmHg for prevention of postoperative SFSS in A-LDLT.

Role of Doppler Ultrasonography in Defining Normal and Abnormal Graft Hemodynamics After Living-Donor Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the early changes that occur after graft perfusion in living-donor liver transplant by Doppler ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated liver grafts of 30 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplant during an 18-month period and who were followed for 1 year postoperatively. The hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, resistivity index, portal vein velocity, portal vein anastomotic velocity ratio, and hepatic vein pattern were compared after excluding patients who developed vascular complications and acute rejection episodes. RESULTS: We observed intraoperative increases in the mean hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (96.3 ± 65 cm/s), the resistivity index (0.78 ± 0.091), and the portal vein velocity (99.6 ± 48 cm/s), which started to normalize after 2 weeks. In comparing the mean portal vein velocity, portal vein anastomotic velocity ratio, hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, and resistivity index after excluding 5 patients who developed vascular complications, we observed overall significance levels of P < .001, P = .039, P < .001, and P = .040. After we excluded 9 patients who developed acute rejection, our comparison of the portal vein velocity, hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, and resistivity index showed overall significance (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Early and transient increases in portal vein velocity, anastomotic velocity ratio, hepatic artery peak systolic velocity, and resistivity index are common after living-donor liver transplant, with significant declines in the first 2 weeks posttransplant.

Early Weight Recidivism Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Although weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) can be substantial, weight recidivism is still a major concern. The aim of our work is to study early weight recidivism following LSG and to evaluate the role of gastric computed tomography volumetry (GCTV) in the assessment of patients experiencing early weight regain. METHODS: One-hundred and one morbidly obese patients undergoing LSG were prospectively studied. Patients were followed up for 2 years. Those who presented with weight recidivism were counseled for dietary habits and assessed for the amount of weight regain. Patients who regained weight were scheduled for GCTV. RESULTS: Twelve patients were excluded from the study. Weight recidivism was reported in 9/89 patients (10.1 %) [weight loss failure (n = 1), weight regain (n = 8)] and was almost always first recognized 1½-2 years after LSG. The amount of weight regain showed negative correlations with preoperative body weight and body mass index (r = -0.643, P = 0.086 and r = -0.690, P = 0.058; respectively) and positive correlations with the distance between the pylorus and the beginning of the staple line (r = 0.869, P = 0.005), as well as with the residual gastric volume (RGV) on GCTV 2 years after LSG (r = 0.786, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In the small group of patients who regained weight, a longer distance between the pylorus and the beginning of the staple line, as well as a higher RGV on GCTV 2 years after LSG, were both associated with increased weight regain. Gastric computed tomography volumetry with RGV measurement holds promise as a useful research tool after LSG.