Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 206
Filtrar
1.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1437704, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39315334

RESUMEN

Introduction: We report head-to-head comparison of the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccine efficacies against immediate precursors of cervical cancer from 15 years' country-wide cancer registry follow-up of phase III trial cohorts and an age-aligned cohort of unvaccinated women. Methods: These individually and/or clusterrandomized cohorts of HPV6/11/16/18- and HPV16/18-vaccinated and unvaccinated women were enrolled, respectively, in 2002, 2004, and 2003/2005. The trial cohorts comprised initially 16- to 17-year-old HPV6/11/16/18-vaccinated FUTURE II (NCT00092534) participants (866) and HPV16/18-vaccinated PATRICIA (NCT00122681) and 012 trial (NCT00169494) participants (2,465), and 16,526 initially 16- to 19-year-old unvaccinated controls. After active 4-year clinical follow-up, passive, country-wide Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) follow-up for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) was based on consented use of unique personal identifiers and started 6 months after the end of the FUTURE II and PATRICIA trials in 2007 and 2009, and ended at the end of 2019. The follow-up with altogether 229,020 follow-up years was age-aligned to ensure that similarly aged cohorts were passively followed up for 15 years post=vaccination for the intention-to-treat analyses of vaccine efficacy. Results: Overall, we identified 5 and 16 CIN3 (no AIS) cases in the HPV6/11/16/18 and HPV16/18 cohorts, respectively, during the FCR-based follow-up. In the unvaccinated cohort, we identified 281 CIN3 cases, 20 AIS cases, and 13 cases with invasive cervical cancer. Vaccine efficacies against CIN3+ were 68.4% and 64.5% for the quadrivalent and the bivalent vaccines, respectively, with overlapping confidence intervals. Discussion: Long-term follow-up of randomized, initially adolescent HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts shows, in this head-to-head setting, that the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines are equally effective against immediate precursors of cervical cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Displasia del Cuello del Útero , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/prevención & control , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Adolescente , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Adulto Joven , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/prevención & control , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/virología , Finlandia , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación
2.
NPJ Vaccines ; 9(1): 146, 2024 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138224

RESUMEN

Although HPV vaccines are highly efficacious, a notable proportion of quadrivalent vaccinees are HPV18 seronegative post-vaccination. We have investigated this findings' validity by comparing vaccine-induced antibody responses using two different immunoassays. 6558 16-17-year-old females participated in the FUTURE II (NCT00092534) and PATRICIA (NCT00122681) trials in 2002-2004. Both the quadrivalent and bivalent vaccine recipients (QVR and BVR) received three doses. Twelve-year follow-up for 648 vaccinees was conducted by the Finnish Maternity Cohort. The presence of neutralising and binding HPV antibodies was analysed via HPV pseudovirion-based neutralisation and pseudovirion-binding assays. Four percent and 14.3% of the QVRs were seronegative for neutralising and binding antibodies to HPV16 and HPV18, respectively. No BVRs were HPV16/18 seronegative post-vaccination. The antibody titres were strongly correlated between the assays, Pearson's correlation coefficient, r[HPV16] = 0.92 and 0.85, and r[HPV18] = 0.91 and 0.86 among the QVRs and BVRs respectively. Fourteen percent of QVRs lacked detectable HPV18 antibodies in long-term follow-up.

3.
Anticancer Res ; 43(9): 4037-4043, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648336

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Chlamydia trachomatis infection, a major cause of PID, may persist in some women. Serum IgG antibodies to chlamydial TroA and HtrA are more common in ascending or repeat chlamydial infection than in uncomplicated infection. The aim of this study was to explore the role of C. trachomatis infection in EOC by analyzing chlamydial TroA, HtrA and major outer membrane protein (MOMP) IgG serum antibody responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is based on the review of Oulu University Hospital medical records of 162 women diagnosed with EOC between March 2008 and May 2018. Serum IgG antibody responses to recombinant C. trachomatis TroA, HtrA and MOMP were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunoassay. Complete response to the first line therapy and the three-year survival were the study endpoints. RESULTS: Altogether, 16.7%, 11.1% and 12.3% women were C. trachomatis TroA, HtrA and MOMP IgG positive, respectively. Women with these antibodies were more likely to have a complete response to the first-line treatment, compared to women without these antibodies (63.0% vs. 34.1% for TroA IgG, 50.0% vs. 37.5% for HtrA IgG and 50% vs. 37.3% for MOMP IgG, respectively). The presence of these antibodies predicted better three-year survival. CONCLUSION: Women with EOC and positive markers of persistent C. trachomatis infection have better response to the first-line treatment and seem to have better three-year survival.


Asunto(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis , Neoplasias Ováricas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Factores de Riesgo , Inmunoglobulina G , Proteínas de la Membrana
4.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 934353, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36159646

RESUMEN

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC) is a chronic, difficult to treat vaginal infection, caused by Candida species, which affects women of all ages and ethnic and social background. A long-term prophylactic maintenance regimen with antifungals is often necessary. In most clinical practice guidelines, oral fluconazole is recommended as the first-line treatment. Although clinical resistance to antifungal agents remains rare, overexposure to azoles may increase the development of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans strains. In addition, non-albicans Candida species are frequently dose-dependent susceptible or resistant to fluconazole and other azoles, and their prevalence is rising. Available therapeutic options to treat such fluconazole-resistant C. albicans and low susceptibility non-albicans strains are limited. Ten experts from different European countries discussed problematic issues of current RVVC diagnosis and treatment in two audiotaped online sessions and two electronic follow-up rounds. A total of 340 statements were transcribed, summarized, and compared with published evidence. The profile of patients with RVVC, their care pathways, current therapeutic needs, and potential value of novel drugs were addressed. Correct diagnosis, right treatment choice, and patient education to obtain adherence to therapy regimens are crucial for successful RVVC treatment. As therapeutic options are limited, innovative strategies are required. Well- tolerated and effective new drugs with an optimized mechanism of action are desirable and are discussed. Research into the impact of RVVC and treatments on health-related quality of life and sex life is also needed.


Asunto(s)
Candidiasis Vulvovaginal , Fluconazol , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Azoles/farmacología , Azoles/uso terapéutico , Candida , Candida albicans , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/diagnóstico , Candidiasis Vulvovaginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Fluconazol/farmacología , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Calidad de Vida
6.
J Perinat Med ; 50(6): 844-853, 2022 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35700452

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with received care and support when experiencing stillbirth. METHODS: This was a questionnaire survey conducted at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland during 2016-2020. Separate questionnaires were sent to mothers and partners who had experienced an antepartum singleton stillbirth at or after 22 gestational weeks during 2016-2019. The questionnaire covered five major topics: stillbirth diagnosis, delivery, information on postmortem examinations, aftercare at the ward, and follow-up appointment. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen letters were sent and 57 (47.9%) of the mothers and 46 (38.7%) of their partners responded. Both mothers and their partners felt well supported during delivery. They were also satisfied with the time holding their newborn. Partners reported even higher satisfaction in this aspect with a significant within-dyad difference (p=0.049). Parents were generally pleased with the support at the ward. However, both groups were less satisfied with social worker counseling (mothers 53.7%, partners 61.0%). The majority felt that the follow-up visit was helpful. Nonetheless, a remarkable proportion felt that the follow-up visit increased their anxiousness (25.9%, 14.0%, p=0.018). Partners rated their mood higher than mothers (p=0.001). Open feedback revealed that the support received after discharge from hospital was often insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the parents who experience stillbirth in our institution receive mostly adequate care and support during their hospital stay. However, there is room for further training of healthcare professionals and other professionals contributing in stillbirth aftercare.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Mortinato , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Madres/psicología , Padres/psicología , Embarazo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
J Perinat Med ; 50(6): 814-821, 2022 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629576

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We compared delivery characteristics and outcome of women with stillbirth to those with live birth. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study from Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. The study population comprised 214 antepartum singleton stillbirths during 2003-2015. Two age-adjusted controls giving live birth in the same year at the same institution were chosen for each case from the Finnish Medical Birth Register. Delivery characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the cases and controls, adjusted for gestational age. RESULTS: Labor induction was more common (86.0 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001, gestational age adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 35.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.37-100.45) and cesarean sections less frequent (9.3 vs. 28.7%, p<0.001, aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.47) among women with stillbirth. Duration of labor was significantly shorter among the cases (first stage 240.0 min [115.0-365.0 min] vs. 412.5 min [251.0-574.0 min], p<0.001; second stage 8.0 min [0.0-16.0 min] vs. 15.0 min [4.0-26.0 min], p<0.001). Placental abruption was more common in pregnancies with stillbirth (15.0 vs. 0.9%, p<0.001, aOR 8.52, 95% CI 2.51-28.94) and blood transfusion was needed more often (10.7 vs. 4.4%, p=0.002, aOR 6.5, 95% CI 2.10-20.13). The rates of serious maternal complications were low. CONCLUSIONS: Most women with stillbirth delivered vaginally without obstetric complications. The duration of labor was shorter in pregnancies with stillbirth but the risk for postpartum interventions and bleeding complications was higher compared to those with live birth.


Asunto(s)
Placenta , Mortinato , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortinato/epidemiología
8.
Cancer Med ; 10(21): 7759-7771, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581025

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a community-randomized trial (NCTBLINDED) in Finland to assess gender-neutral and girls-only vaccination strategies with the AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 (AS04-HPV-16/18)vaccine. METHODS: Girls and boys (12-15 years) were invited. We randomized 33 communities (1:1:1 ratio): Arm A: 90% of randomly selected girls and boys received AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine and 10% received hepatitis B vaccine (HBV); Arm B: 90% of randomly selected girls received AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine, 10% of girls received HBV, and all boys received HBV; Arm C: all participants received HBV. Effectiveness measurements against prevalence of HPV-16/18 cervical infection were estimated in girls at 18.5 years. The main measures were: (1) overall effectiveness comparing Arms A or B, regardless of vaccination status, vs Arm C; (2) total effectiveness comparing AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccinated girls in pooled Arms A/B vs Arm C; (3) indirect effectiveness (herd effect) comparing girls receiving HBV or unvaccinated in Arm A vs Arm C. Co-primary objectives were overall effectiveness following gender-neutral or girls-only vaccination. RESULTS: Of 80,272 adolescents invited, 34,412 were enrolled. Overall effectiveness was 23.8% (95% confidence interval: -19.0, 51.1; P = 0.232) with gender-neutral vaccination. Following girls-only vaccination, overall effectiveness was 49.6% (20.1, 68.2; P = 0.004). Total effectiveness was over 90% regardless of vaccination strategy. No herd effect was found. Immunogenicity of the AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine was high in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the difficulty in conducting community randomized trials. It is not plausible that vaccinating boys would reduce overall effectiveness, and the apparent lack of herd effect was unexpected given findings from other studies. This analysis was likely confounded by several factors but confirms the vaccine's high total effectiveness as in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Vacunación Masiva/métodos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Prevalencia
9.
J Infect Dis ; 224(12 Suppl 2): S121-S127, 2021 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396414

RESUMEN

Epidemiologic, clinical, molecular and translational research findings support an interrelationship between Chlamydia trachomatis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Overall, the link between C. trachomatis, PID, and EOC seems to be relatively weak, although nondifferential misclassification bias may have attenuated the results. The predominant tubal origin of EOC and the role of chronic inflammation in tumorigenesis suggest that the association is biologically plausible. Thus, C. trachomatis and PID may represent potential risk factors or risk markers for EOC. However, many steps in this chain of events are still poorly understood and need to be addressed in future studies. Research gaps include time of exposure in relation to the long-term consequences and lag time to EOC. Data of differential risk for EOC between chlamydial and nonchlamydial PID is also needed. Another major research gap has been the absence of high-performance biomarkers for C. trachomatis, PID, and EOC, as well as EOC precursors. Biomarkers for C. trachomatis and PID leading to increased risk of EOC should be developed. If the association is confirmed, C. trachomatis and PID prevention efforts may play a role in reducing the burden of EOC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Infecciones por Chlamydia/complicaciones , Infecciones por Chlamydia/patología , Chlamydia trachomatis , Neoplasias Ováricas , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/microbiología , Biomarcadores , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/epidemiología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/etiología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/virología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/etiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/virología , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/epidemiología
10.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 11: 678961, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34222047

RESUMEN

Localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) causes dyspareunia among reproductive aged women. We review the pathogenesis of LPV and suggest that LPV is an inflammatory pain syndrome of the vestibular mucosa triggered by microbial antigens in a susceptible host. Tissue inflammation and hyperinnervation are characteristic findings which explain symptoms and clinical signs. Education of health care providers of LPV is important since this condition is common, often unrecognized, and patients often become frustrated users of health care. Research is needed on the antigen triggers of the syndrome. Randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate treatment modalities.


Asunto(s)
Vulvodinia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación , Dolor
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA