Collaborative study to establish a World Health Organization International genotype panel for parvovirus B19 DNA nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT)-based assays.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the collaborative study was to evaluate a panel of plasma samples containing different genotypes of parvovirus B19 (B19V) for use in nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT)-based assays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel of samples [Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Parvovirus B19 Genotype Panel 1; National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) code number 09/110] comprises four different members, i.e. Member 1, Member 2, Member 3, and Member 4 (M1-M4); these represent genotypes 1, 2, 3a B19V, and a negative plasma control, respectively. Thirty-five laboratories from 13 different countries participated in the study. Participants assayed the panel members concurrently with the 2nd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard for B19V DNA (NIBSC code 99/802) on four separate occasions. RESULTS: A total of 44 sets of data were returned, 34 from quantitative assays and 10 from qualitative assays. The majority of assays used were in-house and based on real-time PCR. The results showed that all three genotypes were detected consistently by the majority of participants, although a small number of assays detected genotypes 2 and 3 less efficiently, or not at all. Real-time stability studies have indicated that the panel of B19V samples is stable under normal conditions of storage, i.e. ≤-70°C. CONCLUSIONS: The four-member panel is intended for use in evaluating the ability of NAT assays to detect different B19V genotypes (M1-M3). Based on the results of the collaborative study, the panel was established as the 1st WHO International Reference Panel for parvovirus B19 genotypes.

Organ procurement organization compliance with 21 CFR 1271: a challenge for allogeneic pancreatic islet cell transplantation programs.

In order to protect tissue recipients, the Food and Drug Administration drafted Title 21, Section 1271 of the Code of Federal Regulations 1271 (21 CFR 1271) to address infectious disease risk. These regulations apply to tissues but not vascularized organs. Pancreatic islet cells are regulated under 21 CFR 1271. These regulations require qualification of suppliers of critical materials and services with regard to 21 CFR 1271 compliance. As part of supplier qualification, all organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in the United States were sent a questionnaire covering the key components of these regulations. Of the 57 OPOs, 29 (51%) were in compliance based upon survey results. Twelve (21%) were not compliant in one or more areas. All indicated plans to become compliant. The remaining 15 (27%) either failed or refused to complete the survey, some indicating 21 CFR 1271 did not apply to OPOs. Using 2006 data, OPOs compliant with 21 CFR 1271 recovered 50% of the organs procured in the United States. These findings represent a challenge for allogeneic islet cell transplant programs whose raw material must comply with 21 CFR 1271. OPOs should work toward understanding and complying with 21 CFR 1271. Regulatory agencies should work toward enhancing safety of the pancreas supply by facilitating compliance through harmonization of requirements.

Infrastructure development for human cell therapy translation.

The common conception of a drug is that of a chemical with defined medicinal effect. However, cells used as drugs remain critical to patient care. Cell therapy's origins began with the realization that complex tissues such as blood can retain function when transplanted to the patient. More complex transplantation followed, culminating with the understanding that transplantation of some tissues such as bone marrow may act medicinally. Administration of cells with an intended therapeutic effect is a hallmark of cellular therapy. While cells have been used as drugs for decades, testing a specific therapeutic effect of cells has begun clinical testing relatively recently. Lessons learned during the establishment of blood banking (including the importance of quality control, process control, sterility, and product tracking) are key components in the assurance of the safety and potency of cell therapy preparations. As more academic medical centers and private companies move toward exploiting the full potential of cells as drugs, needs arise for the development of the infrastructure necessary to support these investigations. Careful consideration of the design of the structure used to manufacture is important in terms of the significant capital outlay involved and the facility's role in achieving regulatory compliance. This development perspective describes the regulatory environment surrounding the infrastructure support for cell therapy and practical aspects for design consideration with particular focus on those activities associated with early clinical trials.

Testing the safety of clinical-grade mature autologous myeloid DC in a phase I clinical immunotherapy trial of CML.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I clinical immunotherapy trial of CML to evaluate the safety of a clinical-grade leukemic DC product standardized for purity and mature phenotype. METHODS: We injected autologous DC into patients in late chronic or accelerated phases of CML. The patients received mature CD83+ and bcr-abl+ DC prepared from CD14+ cells. Two cohorts of three patients received four injections each of 3 x 10(6) DC and 15 x 10(6) DC/injection, respectively. The first patient was studied before imatinib mesylate (IM) was available, four patients were treated concurrently with IM therapy and one did not tolerate the IM and was off the drug at the time of DC therapy. IM effects on WBC counts precluded DC preparation in numbers sufficient for further dose escalation. The first patient received DC s.c. and all subsequent patients received DC into a cervical lymph node under ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: DC injections were well tolerated. We observed no clinical responses. T cells drawn later in the course of therapy were more sensitive to stimulation by CML DC in vitro. DISCUSSION: The increase in T-cell sensitivity to CML-specific stimulation that accompanied active immunization by CML DC justifies further clinical studies, possibly with modifications such as an increased frequency and number of DC injections.

Apheresis instrument settings influence infused absolute lymphocyte count affecting survival following autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the need to optimize instrument setting and define a lymphocyte collection target.

Autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) is an independent prognostic factor for survival after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Factors enhancing A-ALC collections are unknown. We hypothesize that apheresis instrument settings could affect A-ALC. Data from 127 NHL patients collected from 15 January 1999 to 30 July 2004 using a single apheresis instrument (COBE Spectra (SP), Baxter Amicus (AM), and CS3000 Plus (CS)) were analyzed. The primary end point of the study was to assess the correlation between apheresis instrument settings and A-ALC. The secondary end point was to determine the effect of apheresis instrument on survival post-APHSCT. Patients collected using SP achieved higher A-ALC compared to AM (with modified settings) or CS (P<0.05) and demonstrated superior overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P<0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated A-ALC and not the apheresis instrument as an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, cancelling the prognostic effect of the apheresis instruments observed in the univariate analysis. The survival advantage observed by SP was from the higher A-ALC collected compared to AM and CS. These data suggest that apheresis instrument settings should be optimized to collect CD34(+) cells as well as an A-ALC target, with direct impact on survival post-APHSCT.

The dose of infused lymphocytes in the autograft directly correlates with clinical outcome after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Absolute lymphocyte count at day 15 (ALC-15) after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) is an independent prognostic factor for survival in multiple myeloma (MM); however, factors affecting ALC-15 in MM remain unknown. We hypothesized that the dose of infused peripheral blood autograft lymphocytes (autograft absolute lymphocyte count: A-ALC) impacts ALC-15 recovery. Between 1989 and 2001, 267 consecutive MM patients underwent APHSCT. We set out to determine the correlation between A-ALC and ALC-15 and the utility of A-ALC as a marker for ALC-15 recovery. A-ALC was found to be both a strong predictor for area under curve (AUC=0.93; P=0.0001) and strongly correlated with (r(s)=0.83; P=0.0001) ALC-15 recovery. Higher infused A-ALC was significantly correlated with an ALC-15>/=500/microl. In addition, median post-transplant overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were longer in patients who received an A-ALC>/=0.5 x 10(9) lymphocytes/kg versus A-ALC <0.5 x 10(9) lymphocytes/kg (58 vs 30 months, P=0.00022; 22 vs 15 months, P<0.00012, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated A-ALC as an independent prognostic indicator for OS and TTP. These results indicate that an infused dose of autograft lymphocytes significantly impacts clinical outcome post-APHSCT in MM.

Infused peripheral blood autograft absolute lymphocyte count correlates with day 15 absolute lymphocyte count and clinical outcome after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Absolute lymphocyte count at day 15 (ALC-15) after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) is an independent prognostic factor for survival in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Factors affecting ALC-15 remain unknown. We hypothesized that dose of infused autograft lymphocytes (A-ALC) directly impacts upon ALC-15. A total of 190 consecutive NHL patients received A-ALC between 1993 and 2001. The primary end point was correlation between A-ALC and ALC-15. A strong correlation was identified (r=0.71). A higher A-ALC was infused into patients achieving an ALC-15 > or =500/microl vs ALC-15 <500/microl (median of 0.68 x 10(9)/kg (0.04-2.21 x 10(9)/kg), vs 0.34 x 10(9)/kg (0.04-1.42 x 10(9)/kg), P<0.0001). The median follow-up for all patients was 36 months (maximum of 109 months). The A-ALC threshold was determined at 0.5 x 10(9)/kg. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were longer in patients who received an A-ALC >/=0.5 x 10(9)/kg vs A-ALC <0.5 x 10(9)/kg (76 vs 17 months, P<0.0001; 49 vs 10 months, P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated A-ALC to be an independent prognostic indicator for OS and PFS. These data support our hypothesis that ALC-15 and survival are dependent upon the dose of infused A-ALC in NHL.

Clinical-grade manufacturing of DC from CD14+ precursors: experience from phase I clinical trials in CML and malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a clinical-grade protocol for the manufacture of mature DC from CD14 + precursors derived from normal donors and patients suffering from CML and stage IV malignant melanoma. We manufactured six products for CML patients and five for melanoma patients and administered them as vaccines in phase I clinical trials. METHODS: We isolated CD 14+ cells from apheresis products by immunomagnetic separation and incubated them in X-VIVO 15' medium supplemented with human AB serum, GM-CSF and IL-4 for 7 days, and with additional tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, IL-lIf, IL-6 and prostaglandin E2 for 3 days. Some cells were electroporated and transfected with mRNA isolated from melanoma tissue. DC were characterized by flow cytometry for the expression of CD83, CD86 andCD14. RESULTS: CD14+ cells constituted 14.4+/-6.2% (mean + SD) of nucleated cells in apheresis products and 98.3+/- 3.6% of isolated cells. Normal DC and CML DC were 77.4+/-7.3% CD83+ and 93.5+/- 7.0% CD86+. Corresponding values for electroporated DC from melanoma patients were 66.1 + 7.2% and 94.1 + 7.8%. The yield of CD83+ DC from isolated CD14+ cells was 18.1 + 7.2% for normal and CML patients and 9.8 + 3.7% for melanoma patients. DC viability was 92.7 + 5.8%; after cryopreservation and thawing it was 77+/-13.5%. DISCUSSION: Our method yielded viable and mature DC free of bacteria and mycoplasma. This robust and reproducible method provides cells of consistent phenotype and viability. Cryopreservation in single-dose aliquots allows multiple DC vaccine doses to be manufactured from a single apheresis product.

Endogenous microbial contamination of cultured autologous preparations in trials of cancer immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of the manufacturing and processing of cellular immunotherapy products is necessary to ensure patient safety, establish efficacy, and demonstrate potency. Recognition of the autologous donor as a likely source of microbial contamination of cellular immunotherapy products may improve patient care and reduce expense to the laboratory. METHODS: Data on 243 immunotherapy products manufactured in the authors' institution between December 1997 and June 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Also reviewed were the case reports of four patients whose autologous immunotherapy products were contaminated. RESULTS: Twenty-five (10%) of the 243 immunotherapy products processed were positive on one or more tests for microbial contamination. In six (24%) of the products, the source of microbial contamination was the autologous donor. In 17 of the remaining 19 products, test results were judged to be false-positive. DISCUSSION: The unique processing techniques and stringent controls involved in the manufacture of cellular immunotherapy products may result in changes in the sources of microbial contamination routinely encountered. The identification of the autologous donor as a potential source of the microbial contamination of the product may assist the clinician and the laboratory in troubleshooting products with positive results on microbial sterility testing. Also, the number of false-positive results in this study indicates that further research is needed to maximize the specificity of testing while maintaining the present high sensitivity.

Priming tissue-specific cellular immunity in a phase I trial of autologous dendritic cells for prostate cancer.

We attempted to induce therapeutic immunity against prostate-derived tissues in patients suffering from progressive hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. Thirteen patients were treated with two infusions, 1 month apart, of autologous dendritic cells (APC8015) preexposed ex vivo to PA2024, a fusion protein consisting of human granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and human prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). The infusions were followed by three s.c. monthly doses of PA2024 without cells. Three groups of patients each received PA2024 at 0.3, 0.6, or 1.0 mg/injection. All Ps were two-sided. Treatment was well tolerated. After infusions of APC8015, patients experienced only mild (grade 1-2) short-lived fever and/or chills, myalgia, pain, and fatigue. One patient developed grade 3 fatigue. Four patients developed mild local reactions to s.c. PA2024. Twelve patients were evaluable for response to treatment. Circulating prostate-specific antigen levels dropped in three patients. T cells, drawn from patients after infusions of APC8015, but not before, could be stimulated in vitro by GM-CSF (P = 0.0004) and PAP (P = 0.0001), demonstrating broken immune tolerance against these two normal proteins. Injections of PA2024 did not influence the reactivity of T cells against PAP and GM-CSF. However, antibodies to GM-CSF and, to a much lesser extent, to PAP reached maximum titers only after two or even three injections of PA2024, showing that directly injected PA2024 was involved in stimulation of humoral immunity. Dendritic cells exposed to antigen ex vivo can induce antigen-specific cellular immunity in prostate cancer patients, warranting further studies of this mode of immunotherapy.