RESUMEN
Background/Aims: To study the association of infertility in patients with Budd Chiari syndrome, radiological aspects of the disease determining infertility and to see if there are improved chances of conception following radiological intervention. Methods: Retrospective search of the hospital records was done and patients with Budd Chiari syndrome, who underwent radiological intervention between January 2016 till October 2021 were initially included. Patients outside the reproductive age group, unmarried patients, patients who did not attempt conception or attempted for less than 1 year and patients having other causes of infertility were excluded. 90 patients were assessed for presence of primary or secondary infertility using infertility questionnaire. In patients with infertility, conception during 1-year follow-up period following radiological intervention, was assessed. Results: 146 patients underwent radiological intervention for Budd Chiari syndrome in the study period. 56 patients meeting the exclusion criteria were excluded from the study and subsequently 90 patients were assessed for infertility. 16.7% (15/90) of our patients with Budd Chiari syndrome had infertility, of which 7 were male, and 8 were female. Infertility is more common in younger age group (mean - 28.8 ± 4.2 years) (P < 0.001). In females, presence of pelvic venous congestion on preprocedural imaging showed significant association with infertility (P < 0.001). 6 (40%) out of 15 of patients with infertility conceived during a 1-year follow-up period after radiological intervention. Conclusion: Infertility is a common in patients with Budd Chiari syndrome, with a prevalence of 16.7%. Pelvic venous congestion is associated with women having infertility. Radiological interventions play important role in management of Budd Chiari and may help to overcome infertility in these patients.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the prevalence of back pain in patients of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) with inferior vena cava (IVC) obstruction, and to evaluate the role of IVC recanalization in resolution of back pain. METHODS: All patients with BCS and IVC obstruction who underwent IVC recanalization between January 2018 and October 2022 were included. Patients with degenerative spine disease or other identifiable causes for back pain were excluded; remaining patients were assessed for the presence of back pain. In patients with back pain, pain relief was assessed at 24 h following IVC recanalization. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with BCS and IVC occlusion were identified, of which six with degenerative spine diseases were excluded. Of the remaining 52 patients, 34 (65.4%) had back pain, with pain score between 3 and 9. Engorged epidural venous plexus on preprocedural imaging (p = 0.002), and degree of luminal narrowing (p = 0.021) had a significant association with back pain. Twenty-nine of thirty-four patients (85.3%) with back pain had pain relief immediately following IVC recanalization, more so in patients with engorged epidural venous plexus on preprocedural imaging (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Back pain is one of the under-reported symptoms of IVC obstruction in BCS. IVC recanalization by IVC angioplasty with or without stenting relieves back pain due to the decompression of engorged epidural veins.
