Female couples undergoing assisted reproduction - choices and the importance of pregnancy and genetics.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate female couples' reproductive choices, the importance given to genetics and pregnancy and their expectations regarding mother-child relationship. METHODS: Observational study based on an anonymous survey applied to 217 patients during 2021. The survey was given to female couples under reproductive treatment in a private fertility clinic. The outcomes were divided into 3 main groups: the choice of their reproductive treatment, motherhood and biological links, and their plans for future reproductive treatments. RESULTS: Most patients found it easy to choose their treatments and roles. The choice was mainly driven by success rates, costs, and simplicity, except for ROPA for which sharing biological motherhood was the main reason. Most couples consider genetics and pregnancy important but, in the end, they believe they will have a similar connection to their child, regardless of the role played. In the future, some couples consider doing the same treatment while others consider inverting roles. CONCLUSIONS: Most female couples have no difficulty when it comes to choosing a reproductive treatment or role to play, mainly based on costs, success rates and the possibility of sharing biological motherhood with the ROPA method. These patients give great importance to genetics and pregnancy, but they expect a similar connection to their child regardless of the type of treatment and the roles played.

Impact of low serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer on pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study in artificial cycles with vaginal progesterone.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a serum progesterone (P) threshold on the day of embryo transfer (ET) in artificial endometrium preparation cycles below which the chances of ongoing pregnancy are reduced? SUMMARY ANSWER: Serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET lower ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) in both own or donated oocyte cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: We previously found that serum P levels <9.2 ng/ml on the day of ET significantly decrease OPR in a sample of 211 oocyte donation recipients. Here, we assessed whether these results are applicable to all infertile patients under an artificial endometrial preparation cycle, regardless of the oocyte origin. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective cohort study was performed between September 2017 and November 2018 and enrolled 1205 patients scheduled for ET after an artificial endometrial preparation cycle with estradiol valerate and micronized vaginal P (MVP, 400 mg twice daily). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients ≤50 years old with a triple-layer endometrium ≥6.5 mm underwent transfer of one or two blastocysts. A total of 1150 patients treated with own oocytes without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) (n = 184), own oocytes with PGT-A (n = 308) or donated oocytes (n = 658) were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the OPR beyond pregnancy week 12 based on serum P levels measured immediately before ET. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Women with serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml (30th percentile) had a significantly lower OPR (36.6% vs 54.4%) and live birth rate (35.5% vs 52.0%) than the rest of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed that serum P < 8.8 ng/ml was an independent factor influencing OPR in the overall population and in the three treatment groups. A significant negative correlation was observed between serum P levels and BMI, weight and time between the last P dose and blood tests and a positive correlation was found with age, height and number of days on HRT. Multivariate logistic regression showed that only body weight was an independent factor for presenting serum P levels <8.8 ng/ml. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes did not differ in patients with ongoing pregnancy regardless of serum P levels being above/below 8.8 ng/ml. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only women with MVP were included. Extrapolation to other P administration forms needs to be validated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study identified the threshold of serum P as 8.8 ng/ml on the day of ET for artificial endometrial preparation cycles necessary to optimize outcomes, in cycles with own or donated oocytes. One-third of patients receiving MVP show inadequate levels of serum P that, in turn, impact the success of the ART cycle. Monitoring P levels in the mid-luteal phase is recommended when using MVP to adjust the doses according to the needs of the patient. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03272412.

Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of fertility preservation (FP) using vitrified oocytes in patients with endometriosis and to determine the impact of ovarian surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: University-affiliated private in vitro fertilization (IVF) center. PATIENT(S): Four hundred and eighty-five women with endometriosis who underwent FP from January 2007 to July 2018. INTERVENTION(S): Vitrification of metaphase II (MII) oocytes for future use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocyte survival rate and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR). RESULT(S): Mean age at vitrification was 35.7 ± 3.7 years. The women undergoing operations were younger than the nonsurgical patients (33.4 ± 3.6 years vs. 36.7 ± 3.7 years). The survival rate and CLBR were 83.2% and 46.4%, respectively. The number of vitrified oocytes per cycle (6.2 ± 5.8) was higher for the nonsurgical patients compared with the unilateral (5.0 ± 4.5) or bilateral (4.5 ± 4.4) surgery groups, but was comparable among the surgical patients. The effect of age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.904; 95% CI, 0.858-0.952), number of oocytes (adjusted OR 1.050; 95% CI, 1.025-1.091), and survival (adjusted OR 1.011; 95% CI, 1.001-1.020) on the CLBR was confirmed. However, the effect of surgery was not observed (adjusted OR 1.142; 95% CI, 0.778-1.677). Nonetheless, the ovarian response (vitrified oocytes = 8.6 ± 6.9 vs. 5.1 ± 4.8) and CLBR (72.5% vs. 52.8%) were higher in young (≤35 years) nonsurgical patient versus the surgical patients; older women showed similar outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): Fertility preservation gives patients with endometriosis a valid treatment option to help them increase their reproductive chances. We suggest performing surgery after ovarian stimulation for FP in young women. In older women, an individualized treatment should be considered.