RESUMEN
The bond between humans and dogs is precious and has been treasured since ancient times. Dog ownership is linked to numerous health benefits, such as increased physical activity and social functioning and decreased depression and cardiovascular events. However, dogs can transmit zoonotic diseases to humans, many of which present with cutaneous findings. This review summarizes the dermatologic manifestations, transmission routes, diagnosis, and treatment of zoonotic diseases transmitted by dogs, including vector-borne, bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections. This review emphasizes the significance of clinicians obtaining a comprehensive exposure history when patients exhibit a rash of unknown origin. Such an approach can provide valuable epidemiological clues related to diagnosing a zoonotic disease transmitted by a pet dog. Furthermore, identifying the dog as an infection source and subsequent veterinary treatment can help prevent recurrent infections in dermatologic patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antineoplásicos , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Humanos , Linfocitos T , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, acute, severe cutaneous adverse reaction mainly attributed to drugs, although other triggers, including infections, vaccinations, ingestion of various substances, and spider bites, have also been described. AGEP is characterized by the development of edema and erythema followed by the eruption of multiple punctate, non-follicular, sterile pustules and subsequent desquamation. AGEP typically has a rapid onset and prompt resolution within a few weeks. The differential diagnoses for AGEP are broad and include infectious, inflammatory, and drug-induced etiologies. Diagnosis of AGEP depends on both clinical and histologic criteria, as cases of overlap with other disease processes have been reported. Management includes removal of the offending drug or treatment of the underlying cause, if necessary, and supportive care, as AGEP is a self-limited disease. This review aims to provide an overview and update on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, reported precipitating factors, differentials, diagnosis, and management of AGEP.
Asunto(s)
Pustulosis Exantematosa Generalizada Aguda , Exantema , Humanos , Pustulosis Exantematosa Generalizada Aguda/diagnóstico , Pustulosis Exantematosa Generalizada Aguda/etiología , Pustulosis Exantematosa Generalizada Aguda/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Piel/patología , Exantema/diagnóstico , Exantema/etiología , Exantema/patología , Eritema/diagnósticoRESUMEN
The rapid evolution of anti-cancer therapy (including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy) in recent years has led to a more favorable efficacy and safety profile for a growing cancer population, and the improvement of overall survival and reduction of morbidity for many cancers. Anti-cancer therapy improves outcomes for cancer patients; however, many classes of anti-cancer therapy have been implicated in the induction of bullous dermatologic adverse events (DAE), leading to reduced patient quality of life and in some cases discontinuation of life-prolonging or palliative therapy. Timely and effective management of adverse events is critical for reducing treatment interruptions and preserving an anti-tumor effect. Bullous DAE may be limited to the skin or have systemic involvement with greater risk of morbidity and mortality. We present the epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of bullous DAE secondary to anti-cancer therapies to enable clinicians to optimize management for these patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the leading cause of pediatric cancer mortality. Research addressing genomic biomarkers and clinical outcomes is needed to inform therapeutic decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (age <21) diagnosed with a primary CNS tumor at four upstate New York hospitals from 2008 to 2021. Clinical and histopathologic data were identified from each patient, including genomic analysis of somatic mutations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) where available. These variables were each compared with overall survival using Cox regression analyses. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify patient characteristics that may independently predict survival. RESULTS: We identified 119 patients. Common tumor types included low-grade glioma (N = 51), high-grade glioma (N = 29), and medulloblastoma (N = 11). Common driver mutations included TP53 inactivation (N = 16), BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion (N = 16), FGFR1 amplification (N = 12), BRAF V600E mutation (N = 12), NF1 loss (N = 12), and H3F3A K28M mutation (N = 6). Median TMB was one mutation/megabase (mut/Mb, range = 0-132). Overall survival was 79.9%. Variables associated with poorer survival on univariable analysis were higher TMB (p = .002, HR 4.97), high-grade tumors (p = .009, HR 84.3), and high-grade glioma histology (p = .021, HR 3.14). Multivariable analyses further identified TMB (p = .011, HR 4.46) and high-grade histology (p = .015, HR 5.28) as independently predictive of worse survival. Tumor progression was more common in high-TMB (N = 15, 44%) than in low-TMB tumors (N = 19, 35%). CONCLUSIONS: High TMB is correlated with higher rates of progression and death as compared to low-TMB tumors. These findings may help identify patients who may benefit from alternative treatments, such as immunotherapies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Neoplasias Cerebelosas , Glioma , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/genética , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Glioma/genética , Glioma/terapia , Glioma/patología , MutaciónRESUMEN
Two novel inhibitors of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDHi), ivosidenib and enasidenib, significantly improve survival for AML patients with an IDH1 or IDH2 mutation, respectively; however, rash has been reported as a toxicity of IDHi. The objective of our study is to determine the incidence, grade, clinical, and histopathologic features of dermatologic adverse events (DAEs) secondary to IDHi. This study is a retrospective analysis of 169 patients who were treated with either ivosidenib or enasidenib as single agent or in combination with induction chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 1, 2013 to April 1, 2021. DAEs thought to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to IDHi occurred in 55 of 169 patients [0.32, 95 % CI: 0.25 - 0.40]. Of a total 81 DAEs observed, the most common DAE types were inflammatory dermatoses (27 %); cutaneous vascular manifestations (8%); cutaneous infections (7%); and pruritus (2%). Notably, 50% of infections and 15.5% of rashes were high grade. Knowledge of these findings is critical to optimize the treatment and quality of life of patients with AML on IDHi.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mutación , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Prior malignancy exclusion criteria (PMEC) are often utilized in cancer clinical trials; however, the incidence of PMEC and the association of PMEC with trial participant age disparities remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify age disparities in oncologic randomized clinical trials as a result of PMEC. Using a comprehensive collection of modern phase III cancer clinical trials obtained via ClinicalTrials.gov, we assessed the incidence and covariates associated with trials excluding patients with prior cancers within 5+ years from registration (PMEC-5). Using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we further sought to determine the correlation between PMEC-5 and age disparities. PMEC-5 were used in 41% of all trials, with higher PMEC-5 utilization among industry-supported trials as well as trials evaluating a targeted therapy. Comparing trial patient median ages with population-matched median ages by disease site and time-period, we assessed the association between PMEC-5 and age disparities among trial participants. PMEC-5 were independently associated with heightened age disparities, which further worsened with longer exclusionary timeframes. Together, PMEC likely contribute to age disparities, suggesting that eligibility criteria modernization through narrower PMEC timeframes may work toward reducing such disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment.