Point-of-care lung ultrasound in the assessment of COVID-19: results of a UK multicentre service evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 has had a dramatic impact on the delivery of acute care globally. Accurate risk stratification is fundamental to the efficient organisation of care. Point-of-care lung ultrasound offers practical advantages over conventional imaging with potential to improve the operational performance of acute care pathways during periods of high demand. The Society for Acute Medicine and the Intensive Care Society undertook a collaborative evaluation of point-of-care imaging in the UK to describe the scope of current practice and explore performance during real-world application. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken of the use of point-of-care lung ultrasound during the initial wave of coronavirus infection in the UK. We report an evaluation of all imaging studies performed outside the intensive care unit. An ordinal scale was used to measure the severity of loss of lung aeration. The relationship between lung ultrasound, polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 and 30-day outcomes were described using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Data were collected from 7 hospitals between February and September 2020. In total, 297 ultrasound examinations from 295 patients were recorded. Nasopharyngeal swab samples were positive in 145 patients (49.2% 95%CI 43.5-54.8). A multivariate model combining three ultrasound variables showed reasonable discrimination in relation to the polymerase chain reaction reference (AUC 0.77 95%CI 0.71-0.82). The composite outcome of death or intensive care admission at 30 days occurred in 83 (28.1%, 95%CI 23.3-33.5). Lung ultrasound was able to discriminate the composite outcome with a reasonable level of accuracy (AUC 0.76 95%CI 0.69-0.83) in univariate analysis. The relationship remained statistically significant in a multivariate model controlled for age, sex and the time interval from admission to scan Conclusion: Point-of-care lung ultrasound is able to discriminate patients at increased risk of deterioration allowing more informed clinical decision making.

Incorporating point-of-care ultrasound into daily intensive care unit rounds: Another source of interruptions?

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is the use of bedside ultrasonography by the treating clinician, incorporating those images into direct clinical decisions. While there are a number of different techniques and training pathways in this relatively new modality, there has been little discussion around the logistics of integrating POCUS into the standard critical care "business day" of ward rounds, procedures and meetings. This article explores some of these aspects and presents data from an online survey of POCUS practitioners.

The Use of Lung Ultrasound in Acute Medicine.

POCUS (Point of Care Ultrasound) refers to ultrasound performed by clinicians as part of their initial patient evaluation, often with the aim of answering a specific question as opposed to being a comprehensive assessment. Such ultrasound is noninvasive, involves no radiation and can be rapidly performed at the bedside. It is also widely practiced in emergency and intensive care medicine leading to earlier and more accurate diagnoses for a wide range of presentations such as shock, renal failure and dyspnoea.

Assessment of Fluid responsiveness in the Acute Medical Patient and the Role of Echocardiography.

Both hyper and hypovolaemia have been associated with poor outcomes. Assessment of fluid responsiveness is challenging in the acute medical patient, due to time constraints, limited evidence and quite often the lack of accurate assessment tools on the Acute Medicine Unit (AMU). This article explains how focused echo assessment is quick and easy to use for this purpose on the acute medical take and highlights key principles to bear in mind when assessing for hypovolaemia and whether to administer fluid therapy. The increasing familiarity with focused echo such as Focused Intensive Care Echocardiography (FICE) and Point Of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) makes extension of these skill sets to assess for fluid responsiveness a relatively straightforward next step for acute physicians.

Author response.

We share your understanding that fluid responsiveness is NOT equivalent to hypovolaemia, and that it also does not equate to fluid administration being of benefit. We offer our apologies should our article have suggested otherwise. Indeed, this is one of the key reasons why we advocate fluid administration against measurable goals, such as stroke volume, as well as blood pressure and pulse.