Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 18(23): 3964-73, 2000 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11099326

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This trial sought to determine, for the first time, the validity in human vaccinations of using two different recombinant vaccines in diversified prime-and-boost regimens to enhance T-cell responses to a tumor antigen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with advanced tumors expressing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were randomized to receive either recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA followed by three avipox-CEA vaccinations, or avipox-CEA (three times) followed by one rV-CEA vaccination. Subsequent vaccinations in both cohorts were with avipox-CEA. Immunologic monitoring was performed using a CEA peptide and the enzyme-linked immunospot assay for interferon gamma production. RESULTS: rV-CEA followed by avipox-CEA was superior to the reverse order in the generation of CEA-specific T-cell responses. Further increases in CEA-specific T-cell precursors were seen when local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 were given with subsequent vaccinations. The treatment was extremely well tolerated. Limited clinical activity was seen using vaccines alone in this patient population. Antibody production against CEA was also observed in some of the treated patients. CONCLUSION: rV-CEA was more effective in its role as a primer of the immune system; avipox-CEA could be given up to eight times with continued increases in CEA T-cell precursors. Future trials should use rV-CEA first followed by avipox-CEA. Vaccines specific to CEA are able to generate CEA-specific T-cell responses in patients without significant toxicity. T-cell responses using vaccines alone may be inadequate to generate significant anticancer objective responses in patients with advanced disease. Cytokines such as GM-CSF and IL-2 may play a key role in generating such responses.


Asunto(s)
Avipoxvirus/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/inmunología , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/terapia , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Virus Vaccinia/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alelos , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Citocinas/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Epítopos de Linfocito T/inmunología , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno HLA-A2/genética , Antígeno HLA-A2/inmunología , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina G/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 17(1): 332-7, 1999 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10458251

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced carcinoma was conducted, using a replication-defective avipox vaccine containing the gene for the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The canarypox vector, designated ALVAC, has the ability to infect human cells but cannot replicate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The recombinant vaccine, designated ALVAC-CEA, was administered intramuscularly three times at 28-day intervals. Each cohort of six patients received three doses of either 2.5 x 10(5), 2.5 x 10(6), or 2.5 x 10(7) plaque-forming units of vaccine. RESULTS: The vaccine was well tolerated at all dose levels and no significant toxicity was attributed to the treatment. No objective antitumor response was observed during the trial in patients with measurable disease. Studies were conducted to assess whether ALVAC-CEA had the ability to induce cytolytic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses in patients with advanced cancer. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with the MHC class I A2 allele were obtained before vaccine administration and 1 month after the third vaccination. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were incubated with the CEA immunodominant CTL epitope carcinoembryonic antigen peptide-1 and interleukin 2 and quantitated using CTL precursor frequency analysis. In seven of nine patients evaluated, statistically significant increases in CTL precursors specific for CEA were observed in PBMCs after vaccination, compared with before vaccination. CONCLUSION: These studies constitute the first phase I trial of an avipox recombinant in cancer patients. The recombinant vaccine ALVAC-CEA seems to be safe and has been demonstrated to elicit CEA-specific CTL responses. These studies thus form the basis for the further clinical exploration of the ALVAC-CEA recombinant vaccine in phase I/II studies in protocols designed to enhance the generation of human T-cell responses to CEA.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/inmunología , Carcinoma/terapia , Vacunas Sintéticas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Avipoxvirus , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/genética , Carcinoma/inmunología , Femenino , Antígeno HLA-A2/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfocitos T Citotóxicos/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...