Determinants of adherence in a cohort of Belgian HIV patients: a pilot study.

Since the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV is considered a chronic disease. Adherence to HAART is crucial for effectiveness. Non-adherence negatively impacts patient outcome and the larger economy. However, data on adherence among the Belgian HIV cohort are scarce. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study was to identify determinants of adherence among HIV patients treated in Belgium. The study was conducted at the Aids Reference Centre of Ghent University Hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2012. Sociodemographic data were collected, along with the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ), the Center for Adherence Support Evaluation (CASE) Adherence Index, the EuroQol-6D, the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV (MOS-HIV), the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and three neurocognitive complaints screening questions. To date, 218 patients participated in the study, among whom 173 (79·4%) were male. Mean age was 46·0±10·6 years and 133 patients (63·9%) were homosexual. According to the SMAQ and the CASE, 78·5% and 93·5% of the patients were adherent to antiretroviral therapy. Logistic regression analysis revealed that smoking, neurocognitive complaints, and female sex were independent determinants of non-adherence. In conclusion, there is an elevated risk for non-adherence in smokers, people experiencing neurocognitive problems, and women in our sample. The latter could reflect differences between male and female HIV patients in Belgium. Adherence improving initiatives should be tailored to these three risk groups.

Hepatitis C-seroconversion within three to six months after having contracted clinical syphilis and/or lymphogranuloma venereum rectitis in five homosexually active, HIV seropositive men.

Five Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) seropositive homosexually active men experienced hepatitis C-seroconversion in the period between September 2004 and January 2007 at a single HIV Reference Center (University Hospital Ghent, Belgium). There was no history of intravenous drug use. All had unprotected anal sex with multiple other HIV seropositive men in the recent past. All of them had clinical syphilis and/or lymphogranuloma venereum rectitis within three to six months before the hepatitis C-seroconversion was detected. This confirms the observations in other case reports and studies originating from the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom and Germany, illustrating sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in this high-risk group. Physicians should be aware of the persistent high-risk behaviour in a subgroup of HIV seropositive homosexually active men and perform intensive sexual counselling and screening for other sexually transmitted diseases, including HCV, during medical follow-up.

Families affected by HIV: parents' and children's characteristics and disclosure to the children.

The reduced risk of mother-to-child transmission due to improved HIV treatment has resulted in an increasing number of healthy children born to mothers living with HIV. The study's objective was to identify the number of parents or caregivers in a sample of persons living with HIV in Flanders, the number of HIV-affected children as well as specific family-related characteristics. Using a structured survey quantitative data were assessed on a total of 628 patients at three Flemish Aids reference centres. Qualitative data were collected in a small sub-sample of African caregivers living in Flanders. Twenty-seven per cent of the overall sample had children younger than 18 years, totalling 165 HIV-affected families with 279 children. Parents from developing countries had significantly more children than European parents. One hundred and eighty-two (68%) of all children were HIV-negative, while the HIV status of 75 (28%) was unknown. Disclosure rate was low: 26 (10%) children were aware of the parental HIV disease. The study shows that HIV-affected families have to deal with complex psychosocial issues such as migration, family illness, family secrecy around HIV and disclosure. Service implications are discussed.

Ritonavir/saquinavir plus one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) versus indinavir plus two NRTIs in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-1-infected adults (IRIS study).

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, tolerability and safety of a ritonavir 400 mg/saquinavir hard gel fomulation 400 mg twice daily versus an indinavir 800 mg once every 8 h containing first-line protease inhibitor (PI) treatment regimen. METHODS: Open, randomized, multicentre clinical trial. PI-naive patients received either ritonavir/saquinavir and one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) or indinavir and two NRTIs. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and on-treatment (OT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the study participants were similar in both arms, 67 patients (37%) were naive to antiretroviral treatment. The proportion of patients who achieved a plasma viral load below the level of detection of 400 copies/ml at week 48 was 43% (39/90) in the ritonavir/saquinavir arm and 63% (57/90) in the indinavir arm (P=0.005, I

The effect of treatment intensification in HIV-infection: a study comparing treatment with ritonavir/saquinavir and ritonavir/saquinavir/stavudine. Prometheus Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment with ritonavir (RTV)/saquinavir (SQV)/6 stavudine (D4T) or RTV/SQV alone, with treatment intensification if needed, in protease inhibitor- and D4T-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals. DESIGN: Multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Two-hundred and eight patients were randomized to receive treatment with RTV 400 mg/SQV 400 mg twice daily or RTV 400 mg/SQV 400 mg/D4T 40 mg twice daily. Intensification of study medication with reverse transcriptase inhibitors was permitted if serum HIV-RNA remained > 400 copies/ml after 12 weeks of treatment. Follow-up of this study was 48 weeks. RESULTS: In a strict intention-to-treat analysis, counting all dropouts as virological failures, 63% [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-73%] of subjects in the RTV/SQV group (n = 104) reached a serum HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml at week 48, as compared with 69% (95% CI, 60-78%) in the RTV/SQV/D4T group (n = 104; P = 0.379). In the on-treatment analysis these percentages were 88 and 91% respectively. Thirty-one patients intensified their study medication according to the protocol (28 in the RTV/SQV group, three in the RTV/SQV/D4T group). Thirty out of 31 (97%) patients had a serum HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml at their last follow-up visit. Ten per cent of patients discontinued study medication due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The concept of starting with a simple, potent regimen, that could be intensified if necessary, showed good virological results after 48 weeks in this study, comparable to starting with more drugs from the beginning. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment strategy.

The SPICE study: 48-week activity of combinations of saquinavir soft gelatin and nelfinavir with and without nucleoside analogues. Study of Protease Inhibitor Combinations in Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC) and nelfinavir (NFV), with or without two concomitant nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), in an exploratory objective to identify populations most likely to benefit from quadruple therapy. DESIGN: Phase II/III, open-label, randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter trial. PARTICIPANTS: Enrollment included 157 protease inhibitor-naive adults (> or = 13 years) with HIV-1 RNA > or = 10,000 copies/ml; 132 participants completed 48 weeks of therapy. INTERVENTIONS: SQV-SGC 1200 mg, NFV 750 mg, SQV-SGC 800 mg plus NFV 750 mg, all with two NRTIs, and SQV-SGC 800 mg plus NFV 750 mg alone, all three times daily for 48 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ ml (16 and 48 weeks); time to virologic relapse (48 weeks). RESULTS: Proportions of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml were not statistically significantly different between arms at 16 or 48 weeks, although trends favored the quadruple-therapy arm. In patients experiencing virologic relapse, time to relapse was statistically significantly longer in the quadruple-therapy arm than in the other three arms (p = .007). Quadruple therapy provided benefit in NRTI-experienced patients and those with viral loads above the median value at baseline. Adverse events were mainly mild gastrointestinal disorders in all treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy, including SQV-SGC and NFV, gave a more durable response than triple therapy with either single protease inhibitor. Quadruple therapy might particularly benefit NRTI-experienced patients and those with high baseline viral loads.