RESUMEN
Non-dipping, ie failure to lower blood pressure during sleep, has been found to be more prevalent in diabetic than in non-diabetic subjects. However, the reasons remain to be clarified. Diabetic patients may wake up more frequently during the night (for instance, due to nocturia). This may result in inclusion of awake blood pressure measurements in the night-time average and thus erroneously raise this average, causing misclassification of patients as non-dippers. However, non-dipping in diabetes may be due to blunted effect of sleep itself on blood pressure secondary to autonomic neuropathy. We undertook this study in order to further clarify this question. We studied 23 diabetic patients, and 23 matched controls who underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and reported taking an afternoon nap. Afternoon nap, by virtue of its short duration, is devoid of interruptions, and thus can be used as a model for tiled, non-interrupted sleep. We found that, both in diabetic patients and controls, blood pressure declined during the afternoon nap in a similar magnitude to the night-time decline. However, this decline was significantly blunted in the diabetic patients (13.9 +/- 2.2% decline in diastolic blood pressure during naptime in the diabetic patients, as compared with 24 +/- 2.3% decline in diastolic blood pressure during the siesta in the control group, P < 0.02). The blunted decline of blood pressure during the nap in diabetic patients demonstrates that non-dipping is due to the blunted effect of sleep itself. This can be another facet of autonomic dysfunction seen in diabetes mellitus.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatología , Sueño/fisiología , Presión Sanguínea , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Ritmo Circadiano , Nefropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Every year, millions of Moslems throughout the world fast from sunrise till sunset daily during the month of Ramadan, that is, experience repeated cycles of fasting-refeeding. Studies in animal models have shown that repeated cycles of fasting-refeeding may cause or exacerbate hypertension. Changes in sleeping patterns as well as changes in medication timing may also influence ambulatory blood pressure. We undertook this study in order to examine the effect of the Ramadan fast on treated hypertensive subjects. Seventeen hypertensive subjects were examined, and 24-h blood pressure monitoring was carried out twice, before and during the last week of the Ramadan. All continued their medications, which were all once-daily preparations. Twenty-four hour mean blood pressure as well as average awake and average asleep blood pressure were compared. There was no difference between mean blood pressure before and during the Ramadan (138.5 +/- 18.5/77.2 +/- 8.1 mm Hg vs 136.4 +/- 20.4/75.7 +/- 5.9 mm Hg, P-nonsignificant). Blood pressure load also did not differ before and during Ramadan (systolic load 49% vs. 44%, diastolic load 21% vs. 18%, P-nonsignificant). Weight was reduced by 1.4 +/- 1.6 kg (P < 0.002). We conclude, that according to our findings, treated, hypertensive patients may be assured that, with continuation of previous medications, traditional fasting during the month of Ramadan can be safely undertaken.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Ayuno/fisiología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Islamismo , Religión y Medicina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Atenolol/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroclorotiazida/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Sueño/fisiología , Verapamilo/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Nondipping, ie, failure to reduce blood pressure by >/=10% during the night, is considered an important prognostic variable of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. However, some people wake up at night to urinate. Usually, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring-derived blood pressure includes these rises in the nighttime blood pressure mean. We identified 97 subjects undergoing 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring who reported waking up at night to urinate. We assessed the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring first using total daytime and total nighttime means and then using actual daytime awake and nighttime asleep (as reported by the patient) means. Nocturnal decline in blood pressure was 14.4+/-8.5/11.8+/-6.1 mm Hg with the first method and 17.1+/-8.3/13.8+/-5.9 mm Hg with the second one (P<0.00001). Although the absolute difference between the nocturnal blood pressure declines calculated by the 2 methods was small, the effect on nocturnal dip was profound. Average systolic blood pressure dipping was 10.1% by the total day-total night method and 12.0% by the actual day awake-night asleep method (P=0.00001), and that of diastolic blood pressure was 14.2% and 16.7%, respectively (P=0.00001). The prevalence of systolic blood pressure nondipping decreased from 42.2% by the first method to 31.9% by the second method (P=0.0056), and that of diastolic blood pressure nondipping decreased from 22.6% to 11.3% (P=0.00001). Inclusion of awake blood pressure measurements during the night obscured the normal dipping pattern in people who woke up to urinate. Thus, taking into account people's actual behavior increases the accuracy of the results.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Presión Sanguínea , Ritmo Circadiano , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Micción , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sueño , VigiliaRESUMEN
We present a 19-year-old patient who was admitted for evaluation of prolonged watery diarrhea. Previous study showed one stool culture positive for Campylobacter jejuni, which was treated with appropriate antibiotics with no response. She underwent colonoscopy with multiple biopsies, which led to a diagnosis of lymphocytic colitis. We believe that the patient's disease was due to the infectious process, which triggered an autoimmune response and caused the lymphocytic colitis.