RESUMEN
The efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) relative to intravenous (IV) alteplase in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke are insufficiently established. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare DAPT with IV alteplase in patients with acute minor stroke. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing DAPT with IV alteplase in patients with minor stroke. Functional and safety outcomes in 90 days were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio 4.3.1. Subanalyses were performed restricted to non-disabling minor strokes and NIHSS score ≤ 3. PROSPERO (CRD42023440986). We included five studies with a total of 6,340 patients, of whom 4,050 (63.9%) received DAPT. The follow-up period for all included studies was 90 days. There was no significant difference for individual outcomes of mRS 0-1 (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.85-1.89; p = 0.25), mRS 0-2 (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69-1.43; p = 0.97), or all-cause mortality (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.20-3.13; p = 0.75) between groups. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was significantly lower (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.003-0.36; p < 0.001) in patients treated with DAPT compared with IV alteplase. In terms of mRS 0-1 and mRS 0-2, we found no significant difference in both subgroup analyses. We found no statistically significant difference between DAPT and IV alteplase regarding functional outcome (mRS scores of 0-1 and 0-2) or all-cause mortality at 90 days in patients with minor ischemic stroke. Additionally, DAPT was associated with a significantly lower rate of sICH.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Fibrinolíticos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , AdultoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the efficacy of perioperative or postoperative probiotics as a therapeutic approach for managing colorectal cancer treatment-related complications in patients undergoing surgery, with or without adjuvant therapy. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 1276 patients were included. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of diarrhea (odds ratio (OR) 0.42; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.55; p < 0.001), surgical site infection (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.89; p = 0.023), urinary infection (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.91; p = 0.028), pulmonary infection (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.60; p < 0.001), abdominal distention (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.76; p = 0.004), length of ATB therapy (mean difference (MD) - 1.66 days; 95% CI - 2.13 to - 1.19 days; p < 0.001), and duration of postoperative pyrexia (MD - 0.80 days; 95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.22 days; p = 0.007) in the probiotic group. Nevertheless, length of hospital stay, time to first defecation, and time to first solid diet were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that perioperative or postoperative probiotics is effective for reducing treatment-related complications in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery, with a lower rate of adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Probióticos , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , AdultoRESUMEN
Background: Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are commonly used to manage bleeding in patients during cardiac surgery. However, the relative efficacy and safety of these 2 strategies remain uncertain. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing PCC and FFP in patients who underwent cardiac surgery complicated by bleeding. Review Manager (RevMan) ver. 5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration) was used for statistical analysis. Binary and continuous outcomes were compared using pooled risk ratios and mean differences, respectively. The meta-analysis protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under protocol number CRD42022379144. Results: We included 8 studies with 1,500 patients, of whom 613 (40.9%) received PCC. The mean follow-up period ranged from 28 to 90 days. The PCC group had significantly lower chest tube drainage at 24 hours (mean difference [MD], -148.50 mL; 95% CI, -253.02 to -43.99 mL; p=0.005; I2=42%). Fewer units of red blood cells (RBCs) were transfused within the first 24 hours (MD, -1.02 units; 95% CI, -1.81 to -0.24 units; p=0.01; I2=56%), and fewer patients required RBC transfusion within the first 24 hours (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p<0.007; I2=45%) in the PCC group. There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes. Nonetheless, a subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials failed to corroborate the results obtained from the main analysis. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PCC can be effective, without increased adverse events, when compared with FFP in patients undergoing cardiac surgery complicated by bleeding.
