[In vitro effects of diclofenac and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on prostaglandin release from inflamed bursa subacromialis tissue in patients with subacromial syndrome]. / Effekte von Diclofenac und selektiven Cyclooxygenase-(COX-)2-Inhibitoren auf die Prostaglandinfreisetzung aus entzündetem Bursa-subacromialis-Gewebe von Patienten mit Subakromialsyndrom in vitro.

BACKGROUND: To compare the in vitro effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors (L-745,337, NS-398 and DFU) and of COX-unspecific diclofenac on release of PGE(2 )and 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) from inflamed bursa subacromialis tissue (IBST) obtained from a total of 35 patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bursal specimens were incubated in the presence of drugs (0.01-1000 microM) for 20 min and 16 h. RESULTS: After 20 min 10 microM diclofenac significantly inhibited formation of PGE(2) and 6-keto-PGF(1alpha), whereas L-745,337 and NS-398 (10-1000 microM) induced significant inhibition only at concentrations > or =100 microM. In contrast to equimolar diclofenac, DFU (0.01-10 microM) induced no inhibition of bursal PGE(2) release but a dose-dependent, although statistically not significant inhibition after 16 h. The inhibitory potency of diclofenac (0.01-10 microM) was even more increased during long-term incubation showing greater inhibition than DFU at all concentrations studied. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that in IBST in SIS in vitro the majority of PG is generated via the COX-1 pathway.

Role of cyclooxygenase isoforms in gastric mucosal defence.

A complex system of interacting mediators exists in the gastric mucosa to strengthen its resistance against injury. In this system prostaglandins play an important role. Prostaglandin biosynthesis is catalysed by the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX), which exists in two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. Initially the concept was developed that COX-1 functions as housekeeping enzyme, whereas COX-2 yields prostaglandins involved in pathophysiological reactions such as inflammation. In the gastrointestinal tract, the maintenance of mucosal integrity was attributed exclusively to COX-1 without a contribution of COX-2 and ulcerogenic effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were believed to be the consequence of inhibition of COX-1. Recent findings, however, indicate that both COX-1 and COX-2 either alone or in concert contribute to gastric mucosal defence. Thus, in normal rat gastric mucosa specific inhibition of COX-1 does not elicit mucosal lesions despite near-maximal suppression of gastric prostaglandin formation. When a selective COX-2 inhibitor which is not ulcerogenic when given alone is added to the COX-1 inhibitor, severe gastric damage develops. In contrast to normal gastric mucosa which requires simultaneous inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 for breakdown of mucosal resistance, in the acid-challenged rat stomach inhibition of COX-1 alone results in dose-dependent injury which is further increased by additional inhibition of COX-2 enzyme activity or prevention of acid-induced up-regulation of COX-2 expression by dexamethasone. COX-2 inhibitors do not damage the normal or acid-challenged gastric mucosa when given alone. However, when nitric oxide formation is suppressed or afferent nerves are defunctionalized, specific inhibition of COX-2 induces severe gastric damage. Ischemia-reperfusion of the gastric artery is associated with up-regulation of COX-2 but not COX-1 mRNA. COX-2 inhibitors or dexamethasone augment ischemia-reperfusion-induced gastric damage up to four-fold, an effect abolished by concurrent administration of 16,16-dimethyl-PGE(2). Selective inhibition of COX-1 is less effective. Furthermore, COX-2 inhibitors antagonize the protective effect of a mild irritant or intragastric peptone perfusion in the rat stomach, whereas the protection induced by chronic administration of endotoxin is mediated by COX-1. Finally, an important function of COX-2 is the acceleration of ulcer healing. COX-2 is up-regulated in chronic gastric ulcers and inhibitors of COX-2 impair the healing of ulcers to the same extent as non-selective NSAIDs. Taken together, these observations show that both COX isoenzymes are essential factors in mucosal defence with specific contributions in various physiological and pathophysiological situations.

Cyclooxygenase 2-implications on maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity and ulcer healing: controversial issues and perspectives.

Cyclooxygenase (COX), the key enzyme for synthesis of prostaglandins, exists in two isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2). COX-1 is constitutively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract in large quantities and has been suggested to maintain mucosal integrity through continuous generation of prostaglandins. COX-2 is induced predominantly during inflammation. On this premise selective COX-2 inhibitors not affecting COX-1 in the gastrointestinal tract mucosa have been developed as gastrointestinal sparing anti-inflammatory drugs. They appear to be well tolerated by experimental animals and humans following acute and chronic (three or more months) administration. However, there is increasing evidence that COX-2 has a greater physiological role than merely mediating pain and inflammation. Thus gastric and intestinal lesions do not develop when COX-1 is inhibited but only when the activity of both COX-1 and COX-2 is suppressed. Selective COX-2 inhibitors delay the healing of experimental gastric ulcers to the same extent as non-COX-2 specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Moreover, when given chronically to experimental animals, they can activate experimental colitis and cause intestinal perforation. The direct involvement of COX-2 in ulcer healing has been supported by observations that expression of COX-2 mRNA and protein is upregulated at the ulcer margin in a temporal and spatial relation to enhanced epithelial cell proliferation and increased expression of growth factors. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that upregulation of COX-2 mRNA and protein occurs during exposure of the gastric mucosa to noxious agents or to ischaemia-reperfusion. These observations support the concept that COX-2 represents (in addition to COX-1) a further line of defence for the gastrointestinal mucosa necessary for maintenance of mucosal integrity and ulcer healing.

Effects of specific inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 in the rat stomach with normal mucosa and after acid challenge.

1. Effects of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 inhibitor SC-560 and the COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib and DFU were investigated in the normal stomach and after acid challenge. 2. In healthy rats, neither SC-560 nor rofecoxib (20 mg kg(-1) each) given alone damaged the mucosa. Co-treatment with SC-560 and rofecoxib, however, induced severe lesions comparable to indomethacin (20 mg kg(-1)) whereas co-administration of SC-560 and DFU (20 mg kg(-1) each) had no comparable ulcerogenic effect 5 h after dosing. 3. SC-560 (20 mg kg(-1)) inhibited gastric 6-keto-prostaglandin (PG) F(1alpha) by 86+/-5% and platelet thromboxane (TX) B(2) formation by 89+/-4% comparable to indomethacin (20 mg kg(-1)). Rofecoxib (20 mg kg(-1)) did not inhibit gastric and platelet eicosanoids. 4. Intragastric HCl elevated mucosal mRNA levels of COX-2 but not COX-1. Dexamethasone (2 mg kg(-1)) prevented the up-regulation of COX-2. 5. After acid challenge, SC-560 (5 and 20 mg kg(-1)) induced dose-dependent injury. Rofecoxib (20 mg kg(-1)), DFU (5 mg kg(-1)) and dexamethasone (2 mg kg(-1)) given alone were not ulcerogenic but aggravated SC-560-induced damage. DFU augmented SC-560 damage 1 but not 5 h after administration whereas rofecoxib increased injury after both treatment periods suggesting different time courses. 6. Gastric injurious effects of rofecoxib and DFU correlated with inhibition of inflammatory PGE(2). 7. The findings show that in the normal stomach lesions only develop when both COX-1 and COX-2 are inhibited. In contrast, during acid challenge inhibition of COX-1 renders the mucosa more vulnerable suggesting an important role of COX-1 in mucosal defence in the presence of a potentially noxious agent. In this function COX-1 is supported by COX-2. In the face of pending injury, however, COX-2 cannot maintain mucosal integrity when the activity of COX-1 is suppressed.

Neural aspects of prostaglandin involvement in gastric mucosal defense.

In rats, central vagal stimulation by thyrotropin-releasing hormone protects against ethanol-induced gastric damage by muscarinic release of prostaglandins. In contrast, gastroprotection following capsaicin-induced stimulation of afferent neurons is prostaglandin-independent. Capsaicin-evoked protection is abolished by blockade of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors and inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. Various peptides including gastrin 17, cholecystokinin octapeptide, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, bombesin, corticotropin-releasing factor, epidermal growth factor, peptide YY, neurokinin A analogs and intragastric peptone exert gastroprotection that is abolished by afferent nerve denervation, blockade of CGRP receptors and inhibition of NO synthase. Indomethacin attenuates the protection of some peptides but has no effect with others. The hyperemic response to peptides is mediated by the afferent nerve/CGRP/NO system without contribution of prostaglandins. Furthermore, it was shown that NKA analogs exert afferent nerve-, CGRP- and NO-dependent gastroprotection in the face of substantial reduction of gastric mucosal blood flow indicating that gastroprotection is not necessarily mediated by mucosal hyperemia. In the rat stomach with functioning afferent nerves neither selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 nor COX-2 is ulcerogenic and only simultaneous inhibition of both COX isoenzymes induees mucosal lesions. In the face of pending injury such as intragastric acid a COX-1 inhibitor evokes dose-dependent damage whereas COX-2 inhibitors are not injurious as long as the function of afferent nerves is not impaired. After afferent nerve denervation, however, COX-2 inhibitors or dexamethasone which suppresses the acid-induced up-regulation of COX-2 are highly ulcerogenic. In conclusion, release of prostaglandins following nerve stimulation can mediate protective effects under certain conditions but is not a prerequisite for neurally mediated mucosal defense. Prostaglandins are of particular importance for the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity when neuronal defense mechanisms are impaired.

Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in gastric mucosal defense.

Two isoenzymes of cyclooxygenase (COX), the key enzyme in prostaglandin (PG) biosynthesis, COX-1 and COX-2, have been identified. COX-1 was proposed to regulate physiological functions, COX-2 to mediate pathophysiological reactions such as inflammation. In particular, it was suggested that maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity relies exclusively on COX-1. Recently, it was shown that a selective COX-1 inhibitor does not damage the mucosa in the healthy rat stomach, although mucosal prostaglandin formation is near-maximally suppressed. However, concurrent treatment with a COX-1 and a COX-2 inhibitor induces severe gastric damage. This indicates that in normal mucosa both COX-1 and COX-2 have to be inhibited to evoke ulcerogenic effects. In the acid-challenged rat stomach inhibition of COX-1 alone is associated with dose-dependent injury which is aggravated by additional inhibition of COX-2 activity or prevention of acid-induced up-regulation of COX-2 expression by dexamethasone. After acid exposure, COX-2 inhibitors cause substantial gastric injury when nitric oxide formation is suppressed or afferent nerves are defunctionalized. Ischemia-reperfusion of the gastric artery increases levels of COX-2 but not COX-1 mRNA. COX-2 inhibitors or dexamethasone aggravate ischemia-reperfusion-induced mucosal damage up to 4-fold, an effect abolished by concurrent administration of 16,16-dimethyl-PGE2. Furthermore, the protective effects elicited by a mild irritant or intragastric peptone perfusion are antagonized by COX-2 inhibitors. Finally, COX-2 expression is increased in experimental ulcers. COX-2 inhibitors delay the healing of chronic gastric ulcers in experimental animals and decrease epithelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis and maturation of the granulation tissue to the same extent as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These observations indicate that, in contrast to the initial concept, COX-2 plays an important role in gastric mucosal defense.

Inhibition of angiogenesis by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: insight into mechanisms and implications for cancer growth and ulcer healing.

Angiogenesis, the formation of new capillary blood vessels, is essential not only for the growth and metastasis of solid tumors, but also for wound and ulcer healing, because without the restoration of blood flow, oxygen and nutrients cannot be delivered to the healing site. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as aspirin, indomethacin and ibuprofen are the most widely used drugs for pain, arthritis, cardiovascular diseases and, more recently, the prevention of colon cancer and Alzheimer disease. However, NSAIDs produce gastroduodenal ulcers in about 25% of users (often with bleeding and/or perforations) and delay ulcer healing, presumably by blocking prostaglandin synthesis from cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 (ref. 10). The hypothesis that the gastrointestinal side effects of NSAIDs result from inhibition of COX-1, but not COX-2 (ref. 11), prompted the development of NSAIDs that selectively inhibit only COX-2 (such as celecoxib and rofecoxib). Our study demonstrates that both selective and nonselective NSAIDs inhibit angiogenesis through direct effects on endothelial cells. We also show that this action involves inhibition of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (ERK2) activity, interference with ERK nuclear translocation, is independent of protein kinase C and has prostaglandin-dependent and prostaglandin-independent components. Finally, we show that both COX-1 and COX-2 are important for the regulation of angiogenesis. These findings challenge the premise that selective COX-2 inhibitors will not affect the gastrointestinal tract and ulcer/wound healing.

Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors aggravate ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the rat stomach.

1. Effects of indomethacin, the selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors NS-398 and DFU, and dexamethasone on gastric damage induced by 30 min ischaemia followed by 60 min reperfusion (I-R) were investigated in rats. Modulation of gastric levels of COX-1 and COX-2 mRNA by I-R was evaluated using Northern blot and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. 2. I-R-induced gastric damage was dose-dependently aggravated by administration of indomethacin (1 - 10 mg kg(-1)), NS-398 (0.4 - 4 mg kg(-1)) or DFU (0.02 - 2 mg kg(-1)) as assessed macroscopically and histologically. 3. Likewise, administration of dexamethasone (1 mg kg(-1)) significantly increased I-R damage. 4. Low doses of 16, 16-dimethyl-prostaglandin(PG)E(2), that did not protect against ethanol-induced mucosal damage, reversed the effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitors, indomethacin and dexamethasone. 5. I-R had no effect on gastric COX-1 mRNA levels but increased COX-2 mRNA levels in a time-dependent manner. Dexamethasone inhibited the I-R-induced expression of COX-2 mRNA. 6. I-R was not associated with a measurable increase in gastric mucosal formation of 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) and PGE(2). PG formation was substantially inhibited by indomethacin (10 mg kg(-1)) but was not significantly reduced by NS-398 (4 mg kg(-1)), DFU (2 mg kg(-1)) or dexamethasone (1 mg kg(-1)). 7. The findings indicate that selective COX-2 inhibitors and dexamethasone markedly enhance gastric damage induced by I-R. Thus, whereas COX-2 has no essential role in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity under basal conditions, COX-2 is rapidly induced in a pro-ulcerogenic setting and contributes to mucosal defence by minimizing injury. This suggests that in certain situations selective COX-2 inhibitors may have gastrotoxic effects.

Role of prostaglandins in gastroprotection.

Numerous agents increase gastric mucosal resistance against intraluminal ulcerogens. Although the precise mechanisms of gastroprotection are uncertain, various endogenous mediators involved in gastroprotective effects have been characterized. As prostaglandins exert potent protective effects and inhibition of prostaglandin formation abolishes "adaptive gastroprotection," they have been proposed as key mediators in mucosal defense. This paper reviews the role of endogenous prostaglandins showing striking differences between different forms of gastroprotection. Thus, whereas the protective effect of the antiulcer drug rebamipide involves prostaglandins as essential mediators, the protection conferred by the antacid hydrotalcit is prostaglandin-independent. Furthermore, gastroprotection can occur even when mucosal prostaglandin generation is suppressed. This phenomenon has been observed with some nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, agents that modulate sulfhydryls and certain metals. Recent data suggest that both cyclooxygenase-1- and cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandins can increase mucosal resistance. The precise role of constitutive and inducible forms of cyclooxygenase in gastroprotection, however, remains to be established.

Peptidergic and cholinergic neurons and mediators in peptone-induced gastroprotection: role of cyclooxygenase-2.

This study investigates the neural pathways, mediators, and cyclooxygenase isoenzymes involved in the gastroprotection conferred by peptone in rats. Intragastric perfusion with 8% peptone protected against gross and histological damage induced by subsequent perfusion with 50% ethanol. The gastroprotective effect of peptone was near maximally inhibited by gastrin immunoneutralization, inactivation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoneutralization, blockade of gastrin receptors, CGRP, bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), or somatostatin receptors, and by the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and was partially (46%) counteracted by atropine. Indomethacin and the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors NS-398 and L-745,337 dose dependently (50% inhibitory dose, 4.2, 0.8, and 1.5 mg/kg, respectively) attenuated the peptone-induced protection. Dexamethasone was ineffective. These results indicate that protective effects of peptone involve endogenous gastrin and possibly somatostatin and are mediated by capsaicin-sensitive afferent, cholinergic, and bombesin/GRP neurons. CGRP, NO, and prostaglandins participate as essential mediators. The study provides evidence that prostaglandins derived from a constitutive cyclooxygenase-2 contribute to mucosal defense in the presence of ulcerogens and thus participate in homeostatic functions of the stomach.