The Exeter Universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: A report of 382 hips.

AIMS: We present a minimum 20-year follow-up study of 382 cemented Exeter Universal total hip arthroplasties (350 patients) operated on at a mean age of 66.3 years (17 to 94). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received the same design of femoral component, regardless of the original diagnosis. Previous surgery had been undertaken for 33 hips (8.6%). During the study period 218 patients with 236 hips (62%) died, 42 hips (11%) were revised and 110 hips (29%) in 96 patients were available for review. The acetabular components were varied and some designs are now obsolete, however they were all cemented. RESULTS: With an endpoint of revision for aseptic loosening or lysis, survivorship of the stem at 22.8 years was 99.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.0 to 100). One stem was revised 21 years post-operatively in a patient with Gaucher's disease and proximal femoral osteolysis. Survivorship with aseptic loosening or lysis of the acetabular component or stem as the endpoint at 22.8 years was 89.3% (95% CI 84.8 to 93.8). With an endpoint of revision for any reason, overall survivorship was 82.9% (95% CI 77.4 to 88.4) at 22.8 years. Radiological review showed excellent preservation of bone stock at 20 to 25 years, and no impending failures of the stem. CONCLUSION: The Exeter femoral stem continues to perform well beyond 20 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1441-9.

High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci's method.

PURPOSE: Pre-operative planning is essential in high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Miniaci's method employs Mikulicz's weight-bearing line and is advantageous because the point of mechanical loading is related to the known degenerative condition of the knee. Miniaci's geometrical method has been modified for an opening wedge and described for use with a digital picture archiving and communications system viewer. Reliability for this method was hypothesised to be equivalent to published reliability for landmark-based commercial software and independent of observer experience. METHODS: Twenty-four patients awaiting HTO had standardised long-leg radiographs. Mikulicz's weight-bearing line was projected through the lateral compartment of the knee at Fujisawa's point. The correction angle was generated at the hinge point subtending the current and proposed ankle centres. The opening wedge was plotted to measure an opening distance. Observations were recorded twice by three observers. Agreement was reported as intraclass correlation coefficients with 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: Intra-rater agreement was excellent for the correction angle (0.965-0.985) and opening distance (0.928-0.980). If no set hinge point was used, then the inter-rater reliability was 0.986 for the correction angle and 0.984 for the opening distance. There was no discernible pattern demonstrating improved reliability from the experienced observer. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability is comparable to commercially based landmark software and independent of observer experience. This makes such geometrical pre-operative planning accessible to surgeons who perform HTO with insufficient frequency to justify the investment in commercial software. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.

The Exeter method-acetabular impaction grafting with cemented reimplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of acetabular anatomy and biomechanics at revision hip surgery by replacing deficient acetabular bone through impaction of allograft and/or autograft bone chips. INDICATIONS: Aseptic loosening of the socket due to osteolysis, bone loss from infection, iatrogenic bone loss due to implant removal, and in the primary setting protrusio acetabuli, dysplasia and previous acetabular fracture. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Large segmental peripheral acetabular defects which cannot be contained, the presence of untreated infection, unstable acetabular fractures, previous radiotherapy to the affected hip area. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Sound exposure of the acetabulum with delineation of the bony defect. Creation of a host environment suitable for bone graft and containment of segmental defects using rim mesh or porous augments. Impaction grafting using layered allograft or autograft bone chips of 0.8-1 cm(3), packed using hemispherical impactors, followed by cementing of a polyethylene acetabular component with pressurisation. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight bearing 6 weeks, modified depending on level of containment and intra-operative findings. RESULTS: A successful and reproducible technique with survival up to 87 % at 20 years for aseptic loosening in the revision setting.

Surface finish of the Exeter Trauma Stem: a cause for concern?

Recent guidance recommends the use of a well-proven cemented femoral stem for hemiarthroplasty in the management of fractures of the femoral neck, and the Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) has been suggested as an example of such an implant. The design of this stem was based on the well-proven Exeter Total Hip Replacement stem (ETHRS). This study assessed the surface finish of the ETS in comparison with the ETHRS. Two ETSs and two ETHRSs were examined using a profilometer with a precision of 1 nm and compared with an explanted Exeter Matt stem. The mean roughness average (RA) of the ETSs was approximately ten times higher than that of the ETHRSs (0.235 µm (0.095 to 0.452) versus 0.025 µm (0.011 to 0.059); p < 0.001). The historical Exeter Matt stem roughness measured a mean RA of 0.973 µm (0.658 to 1.159). The change of the polished Exeter stem to a matt surface finish in 1976 resulted in a high stem failure rate. We do not yet know whether the surface differences between ETS and ETHRS will be clinically significant. We propose the inclusion of hemiarthroplasty stems in national joint registries.

Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement.

Following arthroplasty of the knee, the patient's perception of improvement in symptoms is fundamental to the assessment of outcome. Better clinical outcome may offset the inferior survival observed for some types of implant. By examining linked National Joint Registry (NJR) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data, we aimed to compare PROMs collected at a minimum of six months post-operatively for total (TKR: n = 23,393) and unicondylar knee replacements (UKR: n = 505). Improvements in knee-specific (Oxford knee score, OKS) and generic (EuroQol, EQ-5D) scores were compared and adjusted for case-mix differences using multiple regression. Whereas the improvements in the OKS and EQ-5D were significantly greater for TKR than for UKR, once adjustments were made for case-mix differences and pre-operative score, the improvements in the two scores were not significantly different. The adjusted mean differences in the improvement of OKS and EQ-5D were 0.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.9 to 0.9; p = 0.96) and 0.009 (95% CI -0.034 to 0.015; p = 0.37), respectively. We found no difference in the improvement of either knee-specific or general health outcomes between TKR and UKR in a large cohort of registry patients. With concerns about significantly higher revision rates for UKR observed in worldwide registries, we question the widespread use of an arthroplasty that does not confer a significant benefit in clinical outcome.