Three-Dimensional-Evaluation of Aortic Changes after Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) in Zone 0 vs. Zone 2 in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Introduction: The management of aortic dissection has evolved significantly over the decades, with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure emerging as a key technique for treating complex aortic pathologies. Recent practices involve deploying the FET prosthesis more proximally in the aorta (Zone 0) to reduce complications, leading to questions about its impact on long-term aortic remodeling compared to traditional Zone 2 deployment. Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized 3D segmentation software to assess the volumetric changes in aortic remodeling after acute Type A aortic dissections, comparing FET stent graft deployment in Zone 0 and Zone 2. The study included 27 patients operated on between 2020 and 2022, with volumetric measurements taken from postoperative and 6-month follow-up CT scans. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the differences in the aortic true lumen (TL) and the perfused false lumen (PFL) between the two groups. Results: Both Zone 0 and Zone 2 deployments resulted in significant true lumen (TL) increases (Z0 p = 0.001, Z2 p < 0.001) and perfused false lumen (PFL) decreases (Z0 p = 0.02, Z2 p = 0.04), with no significant differences in volumetric changes between the groups (p = 0.7 post op and p = 0.9 after 6 months). The distal anastomosis in Zone 0 did not compromise the aortic remodeling outcomes and was associated with reduced distal ischemia and cerebral perfusion times (p = 0.041). The angle measurements in Zone 0 did not show any significant changes after the 6-month control (p = 0.2). However, in Zone 2, a significant change was detected. (p = 0.022). The part comparison analyses did not indicate significant differences in aortic deviation between the groups (p = 0.62), suggesting comparable effectiveness in aortic remodeling. Conclusions: Performing the distal anastomosis more proximally in Zone 0 offers technical advantages without compromising the effectiveness of aortic remodeling compared to the traditional Zone 2 deployment. This finding supports the continued recommendation of Zone 0 deployment in the management of acute Type A aortic dissections, with ongoing studies being needed to confirm the long-term outcomes and survival benefits.

Sex Differences in Short- and Long-Term Survival after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Background and Objectives: Acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening disease. No differences between men and women have been made in the treatment of AAD so far and knowledge about sex differences regarding long-term outcomes is limited. Materials and Methods: Between 01/2004 and 12/2021, 874 patients were operated on for AAD, including 313 (35.8%) women and 561 (64.2%) men. Clinical and surgical records, including long-term follow-up information, were obtained and analyzed retrospectively. To account for differences in the outcome determined by different preoperative life expectancies, a subgroup analysis for a set of patients matched according to their remaining life expectancy was performed. Results: At the time of AAD, women were older than men (69.1 ± 13.0 vs. 61.8 ± 13.3 years, p < 0.001) and had a shorter remaining statistical life expectancy (18.6 ± 10.8 vs. 21.4 ± 10.4 years, p < 0.001). Significantly more DeBakey type II AAD was found in women (37.1% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.001). Comorbidities and preoperative status at the time of presentation were similar in women and men. More hemiarch procedures (63.3% vs. 52.0%, p < 0.001) and less arch replacements (8.6% vs. 16.6%, p < 0.001) were performed in women, resulting in shorter cross-clamp times for women (92 ± 39 vs. 102 ± 49 min, p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality was similar in women and men (11.5% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.618). Long-term survival was significantly shorter in women compared to men (9.8 [8.1-11.5] vs. 15.1 [11.9-18.4] years, p = 0.011). A matched subgroup analysis revealed that when comparing groups with a similar remaining life expectancy, the long-term survival showed no significant differences between women and men (9.8 [7.9-11.6] vs. 12.4 [10.1-14.7] years, p = 0.487). Conclusions: There are sex differences in AAD, with DeBakey type II dissection being more frequent in women. The seemingly worse long-term outcome can mostly be attributed to the shorter remaining statistical life expectancy at the time of presentation.

Island remodelling in acute and chronic aortic dissection treated with frozen elephant trunk.

OBJECTIVES: The island technique for reimplantation of supra-aortic vessels in frozen elephant surgery is commonly used but might be questioned for dissected vessels. This study analyses the remodelling of reimplanted supra-aortic vessels after FET in acute and chronic aortic dissection (CAD). METHODS: Between June 2017 and April 2021, 133 patients were operated for acute and CAD using the frozen elephant technique. The island technique for reimplantation of the supra-aortic vessels was used in 94/133 patients. In 68 acute and 21 chronic patients, the total vessel lumen (VL), true lumen, false lumen (FL) and perfused FL area were measured in the innominate, right common carotid and left common carotid artery. Relative luminal changes were compared. RESULTS: In acute aortic dissection, 80% innominate, 40% right carotid and 59% left carotid arteries were dissected preoperatively, but postoperatively FL was only patent in 29%, 12% and 10% (P < 0.001). FL disappearance resulted in >20% total VL reduction in innominate, right carotid and left carotid artery (P < 0.01). In CAD, only 38% innominate, 14% right carotid and 43% left carotid arteries were dissected preoperatively, but postoperatively FL was patent in 19% (ns), 10% (ns) and 5% (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Vascular remodelling is frequently found after the island technique. In acute aortic dissection, the island technique frequently initiates FL disappearance associated with VL decrease. Continuously dissected head vessels show positive remodelling with true lumen increase without VL increase. FL disappearance is frequently found in CAD.

The euro area's pandemic recession: A DSGE-based interpretation.

This paper augments the European Commission's open-economy DSGE model (GM) with COVID-specific shocks ('forced savings', labour hoarding) and financially-constrained investors to account for the extreme volatility of private domestic demand and hours worked during COVID-19, and it estimates the model on euro area data for the period 1998q4-2021q4. It takes a pragmatic approach of adapting the workhorse model of a policy institution to COVID-19 data. 'Forced savings' are central to explain quarterly real GDP growth during the pandemic, complemented by contributions from foreign demand and trade, and the negative impact of persistently higher savings after the first wave. We provide extensive model validation, including a comparison to off-model evidence for COVID-related restrictions, and a comparison of different model specifications.

Domestic versus foreign drivers of trade (im)balances: How robust is evidence from estimated DSGE models?

Estimated DSGE models tend to ascribe a significant and often predominant part of a country's trade balance (TB) dynamics to domestic drivers ("shocks"), suggesting foreign factors to be only of secondary importance. This paper revisits the result based on more agnostic approaches to shock transmission and using "agnostic structural disturbances". We estimate multi-region models for Germany and Spain as countries with very distinct TB patterns since 1999. Results suggest that domestic drivers remain dominant when theory-based restrictions on shock transmission are relaxed, although the transmission of foreign shocks is strengthened.

Direct true lumen cannulation in type A acute aortic dissection: A review of an 11 years' experience.

OBJECTIVES: Direct true lumen cannulation (DTLC) of the aorta is an alternative cardiopulmonary bypass cannulation technique in the context of type A acute aortic dissection (A-AAD). DTLC has been reported to be effective in restoring adequate perfusion to jeopardized organs. This study reports and compares operative outcomes with DTLC or alternative cannulation techniques in a large cohort of patients with A-AAD. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for A-AAD between January 2006 and January 2017 in Mainz university hospital were reviewed. The choice of cannulation technique was left to the operating surgeon, however DTLC was our preference in patients who were in state of shock or showed signs of tamponade or hypoperfusion, in cases of potential cerebral malperfusion, as well as in patients who were under resuscitation. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients (63% males, mean age 64±13.8 years) underwent emergency surgery for A-AAD. The DTLC technique was used in 52.4% of patients. The DTLC group of patients had worse clinical status at the time of presentation with more shock, tamponade, true lumen collapse, cerebral and other malperfusion states. New neurologic events were diagnosed in around 8% of patients in each group following surgery, but there was a trend for quicker neurological recovery in the DTLC-group. Early mortality rates, short-term and long-term survival rates did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: DTLC is a safe cannulation technique that enables effective antegrade true lumen perfusion in complicated A-AAD scenarios, and is an advantageous addition to the aortic surgeons' armamentarium.

Survival and reinterventions after isolated proximal aortic repair in acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional treatment for acute type A dissection is the replacement of the ascending aorta. This study demonstrates the results of a conventional approach with isolated proximal repair combined with concomitant endovascular procedures. METHODS: Replacement of the ascending aorta with or without an open distal anastomosis was defined as isolated proximal repair and was performed in 562/588 patients between January 2004 and June 2017. A total of 68% were DeBakey type I and 32% were DeBakey type II aortic dissections. Concomitant procedures were thoracic endovascular aortic repair (3.6%); visceral, renal and iliac stents (2%); and peripheral bypasses (1.1%). Mean follow-up was 4.6 ± 3.5 years with a 98% follow-up rate. Early and long-term survival, reintervention rates and risk factors were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate was 10.7%, 5.6% in DeBakey type II and 13% in DeBakey type I aortic dissection (P = 0.008). Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were age [odds ratio (OR) 1.03], chronic obstructive lung disease (OR 3.98), coronary artery disease (OR 2.19), Penn class BC (OR 15.41) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.01). The 5- and 10-year survival rates, including in-hospital mortality, were 71% and 54% for type I and 73% and 65% for type II aortic dissection, respectively (P = 0.14). Freedom from reintervention after 5 and 10 years was 96% and 94% for DeBakey type II aortic dissection and 86% and 78% for type I (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with concomitant endovascular procedures, good short- and long-term results can be achieved in DeBakey type I and II aortic dissection. The reintervention rate is higher in DeBakey type I but can be managed open and endovascularly with good results.