RESUMEN
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is an unpredictable and common mode of death in patients with heart failure (HF). Alterations in calcium handling may lead to malignant arrhythmias, resulting in SCD, and variants in calcium signaling-related genes have a significant association with SCD. Therefore, the aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to investigate the association of Ser96Ala [histidine-rich calcium-binding protein (HRC)], Ser49Gly [ß1-adrenergic receptor (ADRB1)], Arg389Gly (ADRB1) and Gly1886Ser [ryanodine receptor 2 (RYR2)] polymorphisms with serious arrhythmic events and overall mortality in patients with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of non-ischemic etiology. In total, 136 patients with HF underwent physical examination, routine laboratory tests, non-invasive assessment of cardiac function and an invasive electrophysiological study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of serious arrhythmic events, set as either SCD or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and the secondary outcome was all-cause death. During a median follow-up of 37 months, arrhythmic events occurred in 26 patients (19%) and 41 patients (30%) died. Patients carrying the Ser allele of the Ser96Ala polymorphism in HRC had worse survival than those with the Ala/Ala genotype (log-rank P=0.043). Despite the difference in survival time, the Ala/Ala genotype was not associated with all-cause death in the regression analysis [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.17; 95% CI, 0.02-1.21]. Regarding the Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly polymorphisms in ADRB1, homozygosity for the major alleles at both sites (Ser49Ser and Arg389Arg) was associated with a two-fold increased risk of all-cause death compared with the other genotype combinations (unadjusted HR=1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.82). However, this association was lost after controlling for clinical covariates. No association was observed for the Gly1886Ser polymorphism in RYR2. Overall, the present findings are concurrent with the hypothesis that the Ser96Ala (HRC), Ser49Gly (ADRB1) and Arg389Gly (ADRB1) polymorphisms may be associated with HF prognosis. In particular, the Ser96Ala polymorphism might aid in risk stratification and patient selection for ICD implantation.
RESUMEN
Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a frequent cause of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased survival. Despite constant improvements in SCA management, survival remains poor. We aimed to assess pre-PCI SCA incidence and related outcomes in patients admitted with STEMI. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients admitted with STEMI in a tertiary university hospital over 11 years. All patients were submitted to emergency coronary angiography. Baseline characteristics, details of the procedure, reperfusion strategies, and adverse outcomes were assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 1-year mortality after hospital discharge. Predictors of pre-PCI SCA was also assessed. Results: During the study period 1,493 patients were included; the mean age was 61.1 years (±12), and 65.3% were male. Pre-PCI SCA was present in 133 (8.9%) patients. In-hospital mortality was higher in the pre-PCI SCA group (36.8% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, anterior MI, cardiogenic shock, age, pre-PCI SCA and lower ejection fraction remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. When we analyzed the interaction between pre-PCI SCA and cardiogenic shock upon admission there is a further increase in mortality risk when both conditions are present. For predictors of pre-PCI SCA, only younger age and cardiogenic shock remained significantly associated after multivariate analysis. Overall 1-year mortality rates were similar between pre-PCI SCA survivors and non-pre-PCI SCA group. Conclusion: In a cohort of consecutive patients admitted with STEMI, pre-PCI SCA was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, and its association with cardiogenic shock further increases mortality risk. However, long-term mortality among pre-PCI SCA survivors was similar to non-SCA patients. Understanding characteristics associated with pre-PCI SCA may help to prevent and improve the management of STEMI patients.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac biomarkers have been proposed as a new tool to improve risk stratification of serious arrhythmic events in patients with heart failure (HF) beyond estimates of left ventricular ejection fraction. Growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, a stress-induced cytokine, has been found to correlate with markers of myocardial fibrosis and adverse clinical outcomes, but its role as a predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic HF is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective observational study was conducted in 148 nonischemic patients with HF who underwent comprehensive clinical and laboratory evaluation, including measurement of serum GDF-15. The study endpoints were serious arrhythmic events (which included appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and sudden cardiac death) and all-cause mortality. Mean age of the cohort was 54.8 ± 12.7 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 27.4% ± 7.5%. During a mean follow-up time of 42 months, arrhythmic events occurred in 28 patients (19%), and 40 patients (27%) died. An increase in serum GDF-15 (log-transformed) correlated linearly with a higher risk of serious arrhythmic events (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.03) even after adjustment for other potential clinical predictors (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, p = 0.02). GDF-15 was also strongly and independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.17, 1.05-1.31, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of nonischemic HF patients on optimized medical treatment, serum GDF-15 levels were independently associated with major arrhythmic events and overall mortality. This biomarker may add prognostic information to better stratify the risk of sudden death in this particular population.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Dilatada , Desfibriladores Implantables , Adulto , Anciano , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía , Factor 15 de Diferenciación de Crecimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
Resumo Fundamento: A doença pelo novo coronavírus (COVID-19) está associada a manifestações clínicas cardiovasculares, incluindo a ocorrência de arritmias cardíacas. Objetivos: Avaliar a incidência de arritmias cardíacas (taquiarritmia atrial, bradiarritmia e taquicardia ventricular sustentada) e de parada cardiorrespiratória (PCR) em uma coorte de pacientes internados com COVID-19 em hospital universitário terciário. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo realizado por meio de revisão dos registros de prontuário médico. Para comparação entre os grupos, foi considerado como estatisticamente significativo valor de P < 0,05. Resultados: Foram incluídos 241 pacientes consecutivos com diagnóstico de COVID-19 (idade média, 57,8 ± 15,0 anos; 51,5% homens; 80,5% de raça branca) e 35,3% com necessidade de ventilação mecânica invasiva (VM). A mortalidade geral foi de 26,6%, sendo de 58,8% entre aqueles em VM. Arritmias cardíacas ocorreram em 8,7% dos pacientes, sendo a mais comum taquiarritmia atrial (76,2%). Pacientes com arritmias apresentaram maior mortalidade, 52,4% versus 24,1% (p=0,005). Em análise multivariada, apenas a presença de insuficiência cardíaca foi associada a maior risco de arritmias ( hazard ratio , 11,9; IC 95%: 3,6-39,5; p<0,001). Durante a internação, 3,3% dos pacientes foram atendidos em PCR, com predomínio de ritmos não chocáveis. Todos os atendidos em PCR evoluíram com óbito durante a internação. Conclusão: A incidência de arritmias cardíacas em pacientes internados com COVID-19 em hospital terciário brasileiro foi de 8,7%, sendo a mais comum taquiarritmias atrial. A presença de insuficiência cardíaca foi associada a maior risco de arritmias. Pacientes com COVID-19 atendidos em PCR apresentam elevada mortalidade.
Abstract Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with cardiovascular clinical manifestations, including cardiac arrhythmias. Objective: To assess the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias (atrial tachyarrhythmia, bradyarrhythmia, and sustained ventricular tachycardia) and cardiac arrest (CA) in a cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Methods: Cohort study with retrospective analysis of electronic medical records. For comparison between groups, a value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant Results: We included 241 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (mean age, 57.8 ± 15.0 years; 51.5% men; 80.5% white), 35.3% of whom received invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). The overall mortality was 26.6%, being 58.8% among those on MV. Cardiac arrhythmias were identified in 8.7% of the patients, the most common being atrial tachyarrhythmia (76.2%). Patients with arrhythmias had higher mortality (52.4% versus 24.1%, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, only the presence of heart failure (HF) was associated with a higher risk of arrhythmias (hazard ratio, 11.9; 95% CI: 3.6-39.5; p <0.001). During hospitalization, 3.3% of the patients experienced CA, with a predominance of non-shockable rhythms. All patients experiencing CA died during hospitalization. Conclusions: The incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in patients admitted with COVID-19 to a Brazilian tertiary hospital was 8.7%, and atrial tachyarrhythmia was the most common. Presence of HF was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias. Patients with COVID-19 experiencing CA have high mortality.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with cardiovascular clinical manifestations, including cardiac arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias (atrial tachyarrhythmia, bradyarrhythmia, and sustained ventricular tachycardia) and cardiac arrest (CA) in a cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. METHODS: Cohort study with retrospective analysis of electronic medical records. For comparison between groups, a value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We included 241 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (mean age, 57.8 ± 15.0 years; 51.5% men; 80.5% white), 35.3% of whom received invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). The overall mortality was 26.6%, being 58.8% among those on MV. Cardiac arrhythmias were identified in 8.7% of the patients, the most common being atrial tachyarrhythmia (76.2%). Patients with arrhythmias had higher mortality (52.4% versus 24.1%, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, only the presence of heart failure (HF) was associated with a higher risk of arrhythmias (hazard ratio, 11.9; 95% CI: 3.6-39.5; p <0.001). During hospitalization, 3.3% of the patients experienced CA, with a predominance of non-shockable rhythms. All patients experiencing CA died during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in patients admitted with COVID-19 to a Brazilian tertiary hospital was 8.7%, and atrial tachyarrhythmia was the most common. Presence of HF was associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias. Patients with COVID-19 experiencing CA have high mortality.
FUNDAMENTO: A doença pelo novo coronavírus (COVID-19) está associada a manifestações clínicas cardiovasculares, incluindo a ocorrência de arritmias cardíacas. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a incidência de arritmias cardíacas (taquiarritmia atrial, bradiarritmia e taquicardia ventricular sustentada) e de parada cardiorrespiratória (PCR) em uma coorte de pacientes internados com COVID-19 em hospital universitário terciário. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo realizado por meio de revisão dos registros de prontuário médico. Para comparação entre os grupos, foi considerado como estatisticamente significativo valor de P < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 241 pacientes consecutivos com diagnóstico de COVID-19 (idade média, 57,8 ± 15,0 anos; 51,5% homens; 80,5% de raça branca) e 35,3% com necessidade de ventilação mecânica invasiva (VM). A mortalidade geral foi de 26,6%, sendo de 58,8% entre aqueles em VM. Arritmias cardíacas ocorreram em 8,7% dos pacientes, sendo a mais comum taquiarritmia atrial (76,2%). Pacientes com arritmias apresentaram maior mortalidade, 52,4% versus 24,1% (p=0,005). Em análise multivariada, apenas a presença de insuficiência cardíaca foi associada a maior risco de arritmias ( hazard ratio , 11,9; IC 95%: 3,6-39,5; p<0,001). Durante a internação, 3,3% dos pacientes foram atendidos em PCR, com predomínio de ritmos não chocáveis. Todos os atendidos em PCR evoluíram com óbito durante a internação. CONCLUSÃO: A incidência de arritmias cardíacas em pacientes internados com COVID-19 em hospital terciário brasileiro foi de 8,7%, sendo a mais comum taquiarritmias atrial. A presença de insuficiência cardíaca foi associada a maior risco de arritmias. Pacientes com COVID-19 atendidos em PCR apresentam elevada mortalidade.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Taquicardia Ventricular , Adulto , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification remains clinically challenging in patients with heart failure (HF) of non-ischemic etiology. Galectin-3 is a serum marker of fibrosis that might help in prognostication. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of galectin-3 as a predictor of major arrhythmic events and overall mortality. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study that enrolled 148 non-ischemic HF patients. All patients underwent a comprehensive baseline clinical and laboratory assessment, including levels of serum galectin-3. The primary outcome was the occurrence of arrhythmic syncope, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or sudden cardiac death. The secondary outcome was all-cause death. For all statistical tests, a two-tailed p-value<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In a median follow-up of 941 days, the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 26 (17.5%) and 30 (20%) patients, respectively. Serum galectin-3>22.5 ng/mL (highest quartile) did not predict serious arrhythmic events (HR: 1.98, p=0.152). Independent predictors of the primary outcome were left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)>73mm (HR: 3.70, p=0.001), exercise periodic breathing (EPB) on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (HR: 2.67, p=0.01), and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT)>8 beats on Holter monitoring (HR: 3.47, p=0.027). Predictors of all-cause death were galectin-3>22.5 ng/mL (HR: 3.69, p=0.001), LVEDD>73mm (HR: 3.35, p=0.003), EPB (HR: 3.06, p=0.006), and NSVT>8 beats (HR: 3.95, p=0.007). The absence of all risk predictors was associated with a 91.1% negative predictive value for the primary outcome and 96.6% for total mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In non-ischemic HF patients, elevated galectin-3 levels did not predict major arrhythmic events but were associated with total mortality. Absence of risk predictors revealed a prevalent subgroup of HF patients with an excellent prognosis.
FUNDAMENTO: A estratificação de risco continua sendo clinicamente desafiadora em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC) de etiologia não isquêmica. A galectina-3 é um marcador sérico de fibrose que pode ajudar no prognóstico. OBJETIVO: Determinar o papel da galectina-3 como preditora de eventos arrítmicos graves e mortalidade total. MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo de coorte prospectivo que incluiu 148 pacientes com IC não isquêmica. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a uma avaliação clínica e laboratorial abrangente para coleta de dados de referência, incluindo níveis de galectina-3 sérica. O desfecho primário foi a ocorrência de síncope arrítmica, intervenções apropriadas do cardioversor desfibrilador implantável, taquicardia ventricular sustentada ou morte súbita cardíaca. O desfecho secundário foi a morte por todas as causas. Para todos os testes estatísticos, considerou-se significativo o valor p<0,05 (bicaudal). RESULTADOS: Em seguimento mediano de 941 dias, os desfechos primário e secundário ocorreram em 26 (17,5%) e 30 (20%) pacientes, respectivamente. A galectina-3 sérica>22,5 ng/mL (quartil mais alto) não foi preditora de eventos arrítmicos graves (HR: 1,98; p=0,152). Os preditores independentes do desfecho primário foram diâmetro diastólico final do ventrículo esquerdo (DDFVE)>73 mm (HR: 3,70; p=0,001), ventilação periódica durante o exercício (VPE) no teste de esforço cardiopulmonar (HR: 2,67; p=0,01) e taquicardia ventricular não sustentada (TVNS)>8 batimentos na monitorização por Holter (HR: 3,47; p=0,027). Os preditores de morte por todas as causas foram: galectina-3>22,5 ng/mL (HR: 3,69; p=0,001), DDFVE>73 mm (HR: 3,35; p=0,003), VPE (HR: 3,06; p=0,006) e TVNS>8 batimentos (HR: 3,95; p=0,007). A ausência de todos os preditores de risco foi associada a um valor preditivo negativo de 91,1% para o desfecho primário e 96,6% para a mortalidade total. CONCLUSÕES: Em pacientes com IC não isquêmica, níveis elevados de galectina-3 não foram preditores de eventos arrítmicos graves, mas foram associados à mortalidade total. A ausência de preditores de risco revelou um subgrupo prevalente de pacientes com IC com excelente prognóstico.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Galectina 3/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Resumo Fundamento: A estratificação de risco continua sendo clinicamente desafiadora em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC) de etiologia não isquêmica. A galectina-3 é um marcador sérico de fibrose que pode ajudar no prognóstico. Objetivo: Determinar o papel da galectina-3 como preditora de eventos arrítmicos graves e mortalidade total. Métodos: Este é um estudo de coorte prospectivo que incluiu 148 pacientes com IC não isquêmica. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a uma avaliação clínica e laboratorial abrangente para coleta de dados de referência, incluindo níveis de galectina-3 sérica. O desfecho primário foi a ocorrência de síncope arrítmica, intervenções apropriadas do cardioversor desfibrilador implantável, taquicardia ventricular sustentada ou morte súbita cardíaca. O desfecho secundário foi a morte por todas as causas. Para todos os testes estatísticos, considerou-se significativo o valor p<0,05 (bicaudal). Resultados: Em seguimento mediano de 941 dias, os desfechos primário e secundário ocorreram em 26 (17,5%) e 30 (20%) pacientes, respectivamente. A galectina-3 sérica>22,5 ng/mL (quartil mais alto) não foi preditora de eventos arrítmicos graves (HR: 1,98; p=0,152). Os preditores independentes do desfecho primário foram diâmetro diastólico final do ventrículo esquerdo (DDFVE)>73 mm (HR: 3,70; p=0,001), ventilação periódica durante o exercício (VPE) no teste de esforço cardiopulmonar (HR: 2,67; p=0,01) e taquicardia ventricular não sustentada (TVNS)>8 batimentos na monitorização por Holter (HR: 3,47; p=0,027). Os preditores de morte por todas as causas foram: galectina-3>22,5 ng/mL (HR: 3,69; p=0,001), DDFVE>73 mm (HR: 3,35; p=0,003), VPE (HR: 3,06; p=0,006) e TVNS>8 batimentos (HR: 3,95; p=0,007). A ausência de todos os preditores de risco foi associada a um valor preditivo negativo de 91,1% para o desfecho primário e 96,6% para a mortalidade total. Conclusões: Em pacientes com IC não isquêmica, níveis elevados de galectina-3 não foram preditores de eventos arrítmicos graves, mas foram associados à mortalidade total. A ausência de preditores de risco revelou um subgrupo prevalente de pacientes com IC com excelente prognóstico.
Abstract Background: Risk stratification remains clinically challenging in patients with heart failure (HF) of non-ischemic etiology. Galectin-3 is a serum marker of fibrosis that might help in prognostication. Objective: To determine the role of galectin-3 as a predictor of major arrhythmic events and overall mortality. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study that enrolled 148 non-ischemic HF patients. All patients underwent a comprehensive baseline clinical and laboratory assessment, including levels of serum galectin-3. The primary outcome was the occurrence of arrhythmic syncope, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or sudden cardiac death. The secondary outcome was all-cause death. For all statistical tests, a two-tailed p-value<0.05 was considered significant. Results: In a median follow-up of 941 days, the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 26 (17.5%) and 30 (20%) patients, respectively. Serum galectin-3>22.5 ng/mL (highest quartile) did not predict serious arrhythmic events (HR: 1.98, p=0.152). Independent predictors of the primary outcome were left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)>73mm (HR: 3.70, p=0.001), exercise periodic breathing (EPB) on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (HR: 2.67, p=0.01), and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT)>8 beats on Holter monitoring (HR: 3.47, p=0.027). Predictors of all-cause death were galectin-3>22.5 ng/mL (HR: 3.69, p=0.001), LVEDD>73mm (HR: 3.35, p=0.003), EPB (HR: 3.06, p=0.006), and NSVT>8 beats (HR: 3.95, p=0.007). The absence of all risk predictors was associated with a 91.1% negative predictive value for the primary outcome and 96.6% for total mortality. Conclusions: In non-ischemic HF patients, elevated galectin-3 levels did not predict major arrhythmic events but were associated with total mortality. Absence of risk predictors revealed a prevalent subgroup of HF patients with an excellent prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantables , Galectina 3/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Pronóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Muerte Súbita CardíacaRESUMEN
Resumo Nos últimos anos, vários biomarcadores estão ganhando importância clínica na avaliação diagnóstica e prognóstica de pacientes com doenças cardiovasculares. O fator de crescimento e diferenciação celular-15 (GDF-15) é uma citocina induzida por estresse e inflamação, membro da família do TGF-, cuja produção no miocárdio foi demonstrada experimentalmente em resposta à injúria isquêmica ou sobrecarga cardíaca. Este novo marcador foi positivamente correlacionado com aumento do risco de eventos cardiovasculares em estudos populacionais e configurou-se preditor independente de mortalidade e prognóstico adverso em pacientes com doença arterial coronariana e insuficiência cardíaca. Este trabalho tem como objetivo revisar o valor diagnóstico e prognóstico do GDF-15 em diferentes cenários na cardiologia.
Abstract In the last years, several diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers have been studied in cardiovascular disease. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a cytokine belonging to the transforming growth factor- (TGF-) family, is highly up-regulated in stress and inflammatory conditions and has been correlated to myocardial injury and pressure cardiac overload in animal models. This new biomarker has been positively correlated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in population studies and shown an independent predictor of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. This review aimed to summarize the current evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of GDF-15 in different settings in cardiology.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , ElectrocardiografíaRESUMEN
In the last years, several diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers have been studied in cardiovascular disease. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a cytokine belonging to the transforming growth factor- (TGF-) family, is highly up-regulated in stress and inflammatory conditions and has been correlated to myocardial injury and pressure cardiac overload in animal models. This new biomarker has been positively correlated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in population studies and shown an independent predictor of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. This review aimed to summarize the current evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of GDF-15 in different settings in cardiology.
Nos últimos anos, vários biomarcadores estão ganhando importância clínica na avaliação diagnóstica e prognóstica de pacientes com doenças cardiovasculares. O fator de crescimento e diferenciação celular-15 (GDF-15) é uma citocina induzida por estresse e inflamação, membro da família do TGF-, cuja produção no miocárdio foi demonstrada experimentalmente em resposta à injúria isquêmica ou sobrecarga cardíaca. Este novo marcador foi positivamente correlacionado com aumento do risco de eventos cardiovasculares em estudos populacionais e configurou-se preditor independente de mortalidade e prognóstico adverso em pacientes com doença arterial coronariana e insuficiência cardíaca. Este trabalho tem como objetivo revisar o valor diagnóstico e prognóstico do GDF-15 em diferentes cenários na cardiologia.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Animales , Biomarcadores , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Factor 15 de Diferenciación de Crecimiento , Humanos , PronósticoRESUMEN
[Figure: see text].
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Global/tendencias , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/tendencias , Comorbilidad , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/tendencias , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
O manejo de dispositivos cardíacos eletrônicos implantáveis de pacientes que evoluem a óbito tem sido motivo de controvérsia. Em nosso meio, não há recomendações uniformes, estando baseadas exclusivamente em protocolos institucionais e em costumes regionais. Quando o cadáver é submetido para cremação, além de outros cuidados, recomenda-se a retirada do dispositivo devido ao risco de explosão e dano do equipamento crematório. Principalmente no contexto da pandemia causada pelo SARS-Cov-2, a orientação e organização de unidades hospitalares e serviços funerários é imprescindível para minimizar o fluxo de pessoas em contato com fluidos corporais de indivíduos falecidos por COVID-19. Nesse sentido, a Sociedade Brasileira de Arritmias Cardíacas elaborou este documento com orientações práticas, tendo como base publicações internacionais e recomendação emitida pelo Conselho Federal de Medicina do Brasil.
The management of cardiac implantable electronic devices after death has become a source of controversy. There are no uniform recommendations for such management in Brazil; practices rely exclusively on institutional protocols and regional custom. When the cadaver is sent for cremation, it is recommended to remove the device due to the risk of explosion and damage to crematorium equipment, in addition to other precautions. Especially in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, proper guidance and organization of hospital mortuary facilities and funeral services is essential to minimize the flow of people in contact with bodily fluids from individuals who have died with COVID-19. In this context, the Brazilian Society of Cardiac Arrhythmias has prepared this document with practical guidelines, based on international publications and a recommendation issued by the Brazilian Federal Medical Council.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial , Autopsia/métodos , Desfibriladores Implantables , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The role of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well known. However, the usefulness of left atrial (LA) electrical and morphological abnormalities to identify more disabling strokes in sinus rhythm patients is less studied. We evaluated the association between electrocardiographic P-wave abnormalities and echocardiographic LA measures with neurological disability in patients with cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort, we included all consecutive hospitalized patients with cryptogenic stroke. Patients were classified according to modified Rankin scale at hospital discharge and at 3 months. LA abnormalities were identified by electrocardiographic (ECG) P-wave, axis and LA enlargement criteria, and by bidimensional echocardiograph through left atrial diameter and volume index. RESULTS: Among the 143 patients with CS (63.4 ± 14.2 years, 53% women), 70 patients were classified as non-disabling stroke (Rankin score < 2) and 73 patients as disabling stroke (Rankin score ≥ 2) at hospital discharge. On echocardiogram, more patients with disabling stroke presented with enlarged LA volume index (48% vs. 25%; p = 0.01). This difference remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, CHA2DS2-VASc and NIHSS scores (p = 0.02) and even when the LA volume index was analyzed as a continuous variable (p = 0.055). Also, enlarged LA volume index was more prevalent (52% vs. 25%; p = 0.03) among those with disabling stroke at 3 months after hospital discharge. Among ECG criteria, only the LA enlargement assessed by downward deflection was more prevalent in disabling stroke. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated an association between left atrial enlargement, assessed by downward deflection from ECG and volume index from echocardiogram, and more disabling cryptogenic strokes. This information could help to identify patients with poorer prognosis, or a subgroup where atrial cardiopathy may play a role in cardioembolic pathway.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Remodelación Atrial , Ecocardiografía , Electrocardiografía , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Atrios Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the dual interference between cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). METHODS: Forty-three individuals admitted for CIEDs implantation were submitted to a tetrapolar BIA with an alternating current at 800 microA and 50 kHz frequency before and after the devices' implantation. During BIA assessment, continuous telemetry was maintained between the device programmer and the CIEDs in order to look for evidence of possible electric interference in the intracavitary signal of the device. RESULTS: BIA in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction or electrical interference in the intracardiac electrogram of any electrode. After the implantation of the devices, there were significant reductions in BIA measurements of resistance, reactance, and measurements adjusted for height resistance and reactance, reflecting an increase (+ 1 kg; P<0.05) in results of total body water and extracellular water in liter and, consequently, increases in fat-free mass (FFM) and extracellular mass in kg. Because of changes in the hydration status and FFM values, without changes in weight, fat mass was significantly lower (-1.2 kg; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: BIA assessment in patients with CIEDs was safe and not associated with any device malfunction. The differences in BIA parameters might have occurred because of modifications on the patients' body composition, associated to their hydration status, and not to the CIEDs.