[Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone]. / Résultats cotyloïdiens favorables du couple métal-métal scellé dans des armatures métalliques.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Early loosening, before a three-year follow-up, has been observed with cemented cups having a metal-on-metal insert in a polyethylene cup. The metal-on-metal bearing has been incriminated as the source of the problem because of its rigidity (particularly for small cups measuring less than 50 mm) and the creation of stress conditions unfavorable for a cemented fixation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether this phenomenon is observed when the cement is fixed not directly into the bone, but via a Muller reinforcement ring. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2004, 23 arthroplasties using a cemented Metasul cup in a reinforcement ring were implanted in 22 patients (16 women and six men) aged on average 44 years (range 24-56 years). The series included six primary total hip arthroplasties (three for dysplasia, two for protrusions, one for rheumatoid arthritis and one for arthritic degradation) and seventeen revisions (two septic). The Metasul cup (Zimmer-Centerpulse) combined a 28 mm modular head anchored in a femoral implant (two cemented, 21 pressfit) and a polyethylene cup with a Metasul insert (13 of 23 measuring<50mm). In all cases, the cup was fixed with low-viscosity cement in a Myller metal reinforcement ring fixed with screws (Zimmer-Centerpulse). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean 5-year follow-up (range 3-8 years). Acetabular and femoral fixation were analysed (search for lucency and implant migration). RESULTS: Revision was not necessary in any patient for failure of the acetabular fixation. The mean Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné score improved from 12.9 points (range 7-17) to 17.5 points (range 16-18). The radiographic analysis did not reveal any sign of lucency between the cup and ring, nor any migration of the ring. There was no evidence of femoral osteolysis but one femoral revision was needed due to fracture of the lateral cortical identified six weeks after implantation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Cementing the metal-on-metal cup into a reinforcement ring can avoid the risk of loosening observed after direct cementing into bone. In our study, the large number of small cups (13/23) would have been expected to produce a high rate of acetabular lucent lines and/or a high rate of early revision, as reported by others, as early as 24 months. Our series was also different from others by the use of pressfit femoral implants in most patients, which should reduce the risk of cement debris in the bearing. Longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the good results observed to date which suggest that direct cementing of the cup into the bone should be incriminated rather than the metal-on-metal bearing to explain the reported failure of cemented Metasul cups.

[Low accuracy of the anterior pelvic plane to guide the position of the cup with imageless computer assistance: variation of position in 106 patients]. / Fiabilité limitée du plan pelvien antérieur pour l'implantation assistée par informatique de la cupule d'une prothèse totale de hanche.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The anterior pelvic plane, also called the Lewinnek plane, is commonly used as the reference plane to guide imageless computer assisted surgery for total hip arthroplasty (THA) because this plane is considered to be globally vertical in the standing position. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated this hypothesis or the potential variations in orientation as a function of gender, position of the subject, or THA insertion. The purpose of this work was to examine these different hypotheses in a radio-clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane was measured in relation to the vertical plane on plain lateral x-rays of the pelvis in the standing position. X-rays were studied for 106 patients: 1) 82 patients with a THA (40 with at least one dislocation, 42 with a stable hip selected randomly, 19 with a standing lateral x-ray before and after arthroplasty) and 24 control subjects for whom lateral images were obtained in the supine and standing positions to assess potential position-related changes in orientation. RESULTS: The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane was not affected by gender or age. The anterior pelvic plane formed an angle greater than 5 degrees with the vertical plane in 38% of patients and more than 10 degrees in 13%. The orientation of the anterior pelvic plane was not significantly different between the study groups (control versus THA) nor between the THA groups (stable versus dislocated). The supine position modified significantly the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane which changed on average from 1.20 degrees to -2.25 degrees ; the change was greater than 7 degrees in twelve subjects. Implantation of a THA did not modify signi-ficantly the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane in the standing position for the 19 subjects [the variations were small (-1 degrees to 7 degrees on average, range -21 degrees to 8 degrees ) but greater than 5 degrees for 7 of 19 subjects]. DISCUSSION: Most teams use the anterior pelvic plane to guide computer-assisted navigation, considering that this plane is vertical in the standing position. Our findings show however that this is not true for 38% of subjects with a margin of error of 10 degrees , i.e. about half of the anatomic anteversion of the acetabulum. Moving to the standing position would produce a significant variation in the orientation of the anterior plane of the pelvis. This is a source of error which has not been integrated into most imageless navigation systems. Similarly variations in the position of the pelvis from the standing to sitting and supine positions which can produce impingement or dislocation have not been taken into consideration. CONCLUSION: Variations in the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane in relation to the vertical would suggest that this plane is not a reliable reference. To our knowledge, there is no reliable reference which can be easily identified during the operation which would take into account variations in the position of the pelvis. We thus believe it would be preferable to attempt to operate without a reference plane, relying on a more kinematic approach to guide computer-assisted implantation of the THA cup.

[Polyethylene liner replacement: behavior and morbidity in 68 cases]. / Conservation du métal-back lors d'une reprise de prothèse totale de hanche avec changement d'insert: morbidité et devenir de 68 changements d'inserts.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Isolated acetabular polyethylene exchange is advocated as an advantage of metal-backed cups, since the acetabular bone stock can be spared and operative time is shorter. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this is true. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A consecutive serie of 68 THA revisions involving replacement of the polyethylene liner was analyzed retrospectively (liner replacement alone for 37 hips and liner replacement plus femoral component revision for 31). The posterolateral approach was used for the revision in all cases. This series was compared with a control series of revisions involving the acetabular component with revision of the femoral component in patients matched for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS: Operative time and hospital stay were significantly shorter when the revision involved the polyethylene liner alone. In 19 hips, a limited zone of osteolysis was observed around the liner before replacement. At last follow-up, new zones of osteolysis were noted in two hips and aggravation in five, one of which required revision because of acetabular loosening. Episodes of dislocation were observed in nine hips (2 anterior and 7 posterior) of which three underwent revision because of recurrence. These dislocations occurred after liner replacement (n=4) or combined liner and femoral component replacement (n=5). Dislocations were more frequent after multiple hip operations and when the cup inclination was less than 40 degrees . Ten revisions were required for: an unclipped liner (n=2), recurrent dislocation (n=3), acetabular loosening (n=1), infection which was cured after a one-stage procedure (n=1). At seven years, survival was comparable between liner replacement alone (82+/-10%), combined liner replacement and femoral component revision (84+/-11%), and femoral component and acetabular component revision (82+/-11%). DISCUSSION: Changing the cup liner can limit morbidity compared with a more complex revision, but liner replacement alone is insufficient in the event of acetabular osteolysis. It would be preferable to combine osteolysis debridement with a graft or a complete revision. The survival rate after liner replacement is comparable with that observed after more complex revision but the risks of dislocation or unclipped insert are significant. For this reason, liner replacement alone should only be proposed if the cup is correctly aligned and if the new liner can be solidly clipped into the metal back. In addition, this simplified procedure should not be attempted after multiple hip operations.

[A new type of acetabular fracture: "true" posterosuperior fracture, a case report]. / Nouvelle variété de fracture postéro-supérieure de l'acétabulum: stratégie thérapeutique à propos d'un cas.

We report a new variety of acetabular fracture. This posterosuperior fracture affected the acetabular roof and the iliac wing as other superior fractures and presented a supplementary fracture line disjoining the major part of the posterior wall. Two our knowledge, in a series of 940 fractures of the acetabulum, Letournel alone described two cases of superior fractures involving the roof with a slightly anterior fracture line in the iliac wing but with an intact posterior wall in both cases. The patient was treated by osteosynthesis via the iliofemoral approach described by Judet-Letournel. This approach was warranted to achieve simultaneous exposure of both columns and the posterior wall which was separated from the proximal fragment by a secondary fracture line. At six months, the functional result was considered good as assessed by the Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné score. This case widens the Letournel classification and emphasizes the importance of computed tomography to evaluate, in superior fractures of the acetabulum, the volume of the posterior wall fragment and its continuity with the cranial portion of the acetabulum and the iliac wing. For fixation, the surgical approach must be chosen individually according to the position of the fracture lines visualized on the preoperative computed tomography.

[Computer-assisted positioning of the acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty based on joint kinematics without prior imaging: preliminary results with computed tomographic assessment]. / Positionnement de la cupule d'une prothèse totale de hanche par navigation sans image basée sur la cinématique articulaire: Premiers résultats avec evaluation tomodensitométrique de l'orientation des implants.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Most navigation systems for computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) require prior computed tomography (CT) or acquisition of multiple bone landmarks on the pelvis. In order to avoid these problems, we developed a computer-assisted navigation system without CT based on a kinematic approach to the hip joint. The principle is to orient the cup in relation to the cone describing the hip joint range of motion. The purpose of this work was to analyze preliminary results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen primary THA were implanted with the system (16 women, two men, mean age 68 +/- 7.8 years, age range 54-83 years, 18 degenerative hip disease). Two optoelectronic captors were fixed percutaneously on the pelvis and the distal femur. The acetabulum was prepared first followed by the femur using reamers and broaches of increasing size. The last broach placed in the femur was equipped with a large head adapted to the newly prepared acetabulum. The range of hip motion was recorded to determine the maximal range of motion cone. The acetabular cup was thus positioned in order the prosthesis range of motion included entirely the maximal range of motion of the hip joint. RESULTS: One patient fell three weeks after implantation causing posterior dislocation; there was no recurrence. The Postel-Merle-d'Aubligné score improved from 8 +/- 2.9 (range 3-12) preoperatively to 17 +/- 0.8 (range 16-18) at last follow-up. None of the patients complained about the captor insertion and there were no cases of hematoma or fracture. Operative time was 35-40 minutes longer for the first four cases and was progressively reduced 15-20 minutes for the last four cases. Mean leg length discrepancy was 5.6 +/- 7.5 mm (range 0-25) before implantation and 0.6 +/- 3 mm (range -5 to 10 mm) at last follow-up. CT-scan measurements revealed a mean anteversion of the femoral implant of 18.2 +/- 8.5 degrees (range 0-31). Anatomic anteversion of the cup (measured from the pelvis landmark and thus independently of the position of the pelvis) was 24.7 +/- 8.8 degrees (range 12-40). The sum of the femoral and anatomic acetabular anteversions was 43 +/- 13.1 degrees (range 22-71). Anteversions were 16 degrees for the cup and 16 degrees for the stem for the one case of dislocation. CONCLUSION: This method can be used in routine without lengthening operative time significantly. It safely controls leg length and helps position the cup. This study demonstrated that there is no ideal position for the cup which can be used for all patients. Because of the wide range of inclination and anteversion figures, half of the cases were outside the safety zone recommended by Lewinnek.