RESUMEN
Sixty-eight patients suffering from breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lymphoma or multiple myeloma were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. They underwent placement of a central venous port via the subclavian vein for delivery of chemotherapy and reinfusion of stem cells. All patients were followed prospectively for device-related and overall complications, comprising a total of 18,213 days in situ (median: 267 days, range: 90-480). One patient experienced a pneumothorax (1.4%) spontaneously resolved, as an acute toxicity. Two patients (2.8%, 0.1 episodes/1000 days of use) were forced to have the port removed due to infection, caused by Streptococcus mitis in one case, while the causative agent was not identified by laboratory tests in the second. The other 66 patients completed the therapeutic programme, including peripheral stem cell reinfusions and supportive care, such as i.v. antibiotics, antiemetics or fluid administration and blood sample collection, without additional complications. In conclusion, the use of totally implantable central venous access ports has resulted in good long-term access to central veins, in spite of the severe neutropenia and increased septic risk of this category of oncology patients.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Vena Subclavia , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
Se destaca: la articulación de la conducción del sistema de salud por parte del Estado; integración de los efectores públicos; reconocimiento de la participación del sector privado en la prestación de la atención; recuperación y fortalecimiento de la capacidad de prestación de servicios de la red pública; establecimiento de criterios más racionales para la prestación de servicios médicos, entre otros aspectos