Designs and challenges for personalized medicine studies in oncology: focus on the SHIVA trial.

Personalized medicine is defined by the National Cancer Institute as "a form of medicine that uses information about a person's genes, proteins, and environment to prevent, diagnose, and treat disease." In oncology, the term "personalized medicine" arose with the emergence of molecularly targeted agents. The prescription of approved molecularly targeted agents to cancer patients currently relies on the primary tumor location and histological subtype. Predictive biomarkers of efficacy of these modern agents have been exclusively validated in specific tumor types. A major concern today is to determine whether the prescription of molecularly targeted therapies based on tumor molecular abnormalities, independently of primary tumor location and histology, would improve the outcome of cancer patients. This new paradigm requires prospective validation before being implemented in clinical practice. In this paper, we will first review different designs, including observational cohorts, as well as nonrandomized and randomized clinical trials, that have been recently proposed to evaluate the relevance of this approach, and further discuss their advantages and drawbacks. The design of the SHIVA trial, a randomized proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing therapy based on tumor molecular profiling versus conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer will be detailed. Finally, we will discuss the multiple challenges associated with the implementation of personalized medicine in oncology, as well as perspectives for the future.

Dose standardisation of anticancer drugs.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: Body size based dosing is often used for prescribing anticancer drugs. However the scientific and the clinical rationales of this historical method have recently been criticized. As a result, alternative dosing strategies have been suggested, as flat-fixed dosing regimens, but not implemented in routine practice. Dose standardisation is a first step in order to rationalise chemotherapy dose calculation. A new method, derived from dose-banding, was developed, taking into account prescription and economic criteria. SETTING: Feasibility and interest of this concept were studied in two French cancer centres Institut Curie and Hôpital Saint-Louis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The aim of our study was to assess dose standardisation of expensive anticancer drugs in objectives of quality and economy. METHOD: Nine candidate drugs were selected and standardized rounded doses (SRD) were proposed. To determine the specific standard doses of these two centres, two theoretical and practical methods were applied, and then, their results were compared. For each anticancer drug the objective was to fix SRD in order to cover all the doses most frequently prescribed. RESULTS: It has been possible to propose SRD for six of the nine drugs. These SRD have been implemented with the agreement of the medical staff. These doses are, whenever possible, rounded to the nearest vial size, or correspond to a combination of the different strength of the commercial drug. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that dose standardisation is a help to optimise the productivity and improve the organisation of the preparation unit.

Optimization of cisplatin doses in a testicular cancer patient with acute renal failure.

Although testicular cancers are highly curable malignancies, conventional cisplatin based therapy often causes important toxicities, not often easily manageable. Nephrotoxicity occurs in almost all patients, and is potentialized in patients suffering from renal failure. Monitoring of residual levels of unbound platinum was used to define guidelines for cisplatin administration. Monitoring of cisplatin was initiated in a patient treated for metastatic testicular cancer and acute renal failure. Reduced doses of cisplatin were first administered in conjunction with hemodialysis. Unbound and total platinum levels were determined by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The data found allowed us to adapt and increase sequentially cisplatin doses, accordingly with the renal function. Full regimen doses were eventually administered when useful renal function returned. This simple approach may be useful in monitoring cisplatin administration during acute renal failure.

In vivo efficacy of photodynamic therapy in three new xenograft models of human retinoblastoma.

PURPOSE: Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular tumor in children. In industrialized countries, 95% of patients are cured by chemotherapy and conservative treatments. However, these treatments can increase the risk of secondary tumors in patients with a constitutional alteration of the RB1 gene. Photodynamic therapy represents a nonmutagenic therapeutic approach, and may reduce the incidence of secondary tumors. To study the in vivo efficacy of photodynamic therapy, human retinoblastoma xenografts were established in nude mice. METHODS: Three xenografted cell lines, RB102-FER, RB109-LAK and RB111-MIL, were characterized and used for therapeutic evaluation. Mice were randomly divided into control and treatment groups with 5-8 mice in each group. Treatment groups received irradiation alone, photosensitizer alone or both in 2 of the 3 models and in the third model, photosensitizer plus irradiation was compared to untreated controls. mTHPC was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 0.6mg/kg and verteporfin intravenously at a dose of 1mg/kg. Illuminations were performed 24h after mTHPC and 1h after verteporfin injections. RESULTS: A transient but significant response to mTHPC was observed for RB102-FER (p=0.03) and a significant response to mTHPC for RB111-MIL (p<10(-4)) with partial regression maintained for more than 60 days. No significant difference between the different groups was observed for RB109-LAK, except in the verteporfin plus laser group (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The studies confirmed the suitability of the three xenograft models for the evaluation of photodynamic therapy in retinoblastoma. Our findings suggest that PDT may represent an alternative conservative treatment for these tumors.