Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Zoologia (Curitiba, Impr.) ; 38: e61968, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1504606

RESUMEN

The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.


Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Ciencia/educación , Equidad de Género , Estudios de Género , Zoología/tendencias
2.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1504618

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.

3.
Zoologia (Curitiba) ; 38: e61968, fev. 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | VETINDEX | ID: vti-765331

RESUMEN

The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Zoología/tendencias , Estudios de Género , Equidad de Género , Estudios de Género , Ciencia/educación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA