Los pacientes en hemodiálisis presentan peor equilibrio postural, que se relaciona con el riesgo de caídas / Haemodialysis patients have worse postural balance with an associated risk of falls

INTRODUCCIÓN: El equilibrio postural es el resultado de una compleja interacción de aferencias sensoriales que nos mantiene erguidos. Los pacientes en hemodiálisis presentan alteraciones que pueden generar inestabilidad postural y riesgo de caídas. Nuestro objetivo es analizar, mediante una plataforma de fuerzas, la estabilidad postural en pacientes hemodializados y su relación con el riesgo de caídas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo transversal. El balanceo postural se registró mediante una plataforma de fuerzas en los pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis. Se recogen datos epidemiológicos, de diálisis, analíticos y de tratamiento. La incidencia de caídas fue registrada durante los 6 meses siguientes a las pruebas. El análisis de la estabilidad postural se realizó con una plataforma portátil de galgas extensiométricas (AMTI AccuGait®) y una unidad de software específico para estabilometría (programa Balance Trainer®). Se determinan 31 parámetros de equilibrio; las variables de equilibrio utilizadas son: Area 95, AreaEffect, VyMax, Xrange y Yrange. Los estudios de estabilometría se realizan en 3 situaciones: con los ojos abiertos, con los ojos cerrados y mientras el paciente realiza una tarea simultánea. Se realiza un estudio al iniciar la sesión de diálisis y el segundo, al terminar. La estabilometría en condiciones semejantes se mide en un grupo control. RESULTADOS: Se estudian 32 pacientes, con una edad media de 68 años; 20 hombres y 12 mujeres. Su peso medio es de 74 kg y el IMC, de 27,6 kg/m2. En los controles no hay diferencias significativas en la estabilometría entre las 3 situaciones estudiadas. Los pacientes con los ojos cerrados, pre y poshemodiálisis, presentan más desequilibrio, con diferencias significativas con el resto de las situaciones y los controles. Después de la sesión de hemodiálisis se observa un aumento significativo de la inestabilidad. Se observa mayor inestabilidad en los 13 pacientes diabéticos (p < 0,05). Los 4 pacientes con hiponatremia (Na < 136 mmol/L) presentaban peor equilibrio en la situación de tarea simultánea (p= 0,038). Varios fármacos, como la insulina (p = 0,022), los antiagregantes (p = 0,036) y los betabloqueantes (p = 0,029), se relacionaban con el desequilibrio. Los 10 pacientes que sufrieron caídas presentaban mayor desequilibrio, Yrange, Xrange, Area 95 y AreaEffect, pre y poshemodiálisis (p < 0,05) que los que no tuvieron caídas. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes en hemodiálisis presentan alteraciones que pueden generar inestabilidad postural y riesgo de caídas. Programas de prevención que incluyan ejercicios específicos para mejorar el equilibrio podrían ser beneficiosos, reduciendo el riesgo de caídas en esta población

INTRODUCTION: Postural balance is the result of a complex interaction of sensory input which keeps us upright. Haemodialysis patients have alterations which can lead to postural instability and a risk of falls. Our objective was to analyse postural stability and its relationship with the risk of falls in haemodialysis patients using a force platform. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Postural balance was recorded using a force platform in prevalent haemodialysis patients. We collected epidemiological, dialysis, analytical and treatment data. The incidence of falls was recorded over the 6 months following the tests. The postural stability analysis was performed with a portable strain gauge platform (AMTI AccuGait®) and a specific software unit for stabilometry (Balance Trainer® program). We measured 31 balance parameters; the balance variables used were: Area95; AreaEffect; VyMax; Xrange and Yrange. The stabilometry studies were performed in 3 situations: with eyes open; with eyes closed; and with the patient performing a simultaneous task. We performed one study at the start of the dialysis session, and a second study at the end. Stabilometry was measured in a control group under similar conditions. RESULTS: We studied 32 patients with a mean age of 68 years old; of this group, 20 subjects were male and 12 were female. Their mean weight was 74kg, with a mean BMI of 27.6kg/m2. In the controls, there were no significant differences in the stabilometry between the 3 situations studied. Both pre- and post-haemodialysis, patients with closed eyes showed greater imbalance, and there were significant differences with the other situations and controls. We found a significant increase in instability after the haemodialysis session, and greater instability in the 13 patients with diabetes (P < .05). The 4 patients with hyponatraemia (Na < 136 mmol/l) had worse balance in the simultaneous task situation (P = .038). Various drugs, such as insulin (P = .022), antiplatelet agents (P =.036) and beta-blockers (P = .029), were associated with imbalance. The 10 patients who suffered falls had greater imbalance, Yrange, Xrange, Area 95 and AreaEffect, both pre- and post-haemodialysis (P < .05) than those without falls. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients have alterations which can lead to postural instability and a risk of falls. Prevention programmes which include specific exercises to improve balance could be beneficial in reducing the risk of falls in this population

La hipomagnesemia en hemodiálisis se asocia a mayor riesgo de mortalidad: su relación con el líquido de diálisis / Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid

La hipomagnesemia en hemodiálisis (HD) se asocia a mayor riesgo de mortalidad: su relación con el líquido de diálisis (LD). INTRODUCCIÓN: Concentraciones bajas de magnesio (Mg) en sangre se han relacionado con el desarrollo de diabetes, hipertensión arterial, arritmias, calcificaciones vasculares y con mayor riesgo de muerte, en población general y en hemodiálisis. La composición del LD y su concentración de Mg es uno de los principales determinantes de la magnesemia en los pacientes en HD. OBJETIVO: Estudiar las concentraciones de magnesio en los pacientes en HD, su valor predictivo de mortalidad y qué factores se asocian a la hipomagnesemia y mortalidad en HD. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de una cohorte de pacientes prevalentes en HD seguidos 2 años. Cada 6 meses se determina el Mg sérico. En el análisis se utiliza el Mg inicial y el medio de cada paciente, comparando los pacientes con Mg por debajo de la media, 2,1mg/dl, con los que están por encima. Durante el seguimiento se han utilizado 3 tipos de LD: tipo 1, magnesio de 0,5 mmol/l y tipo 3, Mg 0,37 mmol/l ambos con acetato y tipo 2, 0,5 mmol/l de Mg con citrato. RESULTADOS: Se han incluido en el estudio 137 pacientes en hemodiálisis, 72 hombres y 65 mujeres, con una edad media de 67(15) [26-95] años. Cincuenta y siete pacientes eran diabéticos y 70 pacientes estaban en hemodiafiltración en línea (HDF-OL) y 67 en hemodiálisis de alto flujo (HD-HF). El Mg medio de los 93 pacientes con LD tipo 1 era: 2,18(0,37) mg/dl, en 27 con el tipo 3: 2,02 (0,42) mg/dl y los 17 con tipo 2: 1,84 (0,24)mg/dl (p = 0,01). El Mg se relaciona de forma directa significativa con el P y con la albúmina. Después de un seguimiento medio de 16,6(8,9)[3-24] meses, 77 seguían activos, 24 habían fallecido y 36 se habían trasplantado o trasladado. Los pacientes con un Mg superior a 2,1mg/dl tienen una supervivencia mayor, p = 0,008. La supervivencia de los pacientes con los tres tipos de LD no difería significativamente, Log-Rank, p = 0,424. Corregido por la magnesemia, los pacientes con LD con citrato tienen mejor supervivencia, p = 0,009. En el análisis de regresión de COX se observa cómo la edad, albúmina sérica, Mg, técnica de diálisis y tipo de LD tienen valor predictivo de mortalidad independiente. CONCLUSIONES: Los magnesios séricos bajos respecto a los altos se asocian a mayor riesgo de mortalidad. El tipo de LD influye en la concentración de Mg y en el riesgo de muerte

Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis (HD) is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid (DF). INTRODUCTION: Low concentrations of magnesium (Mg) in blood have been linked to the development of diabetes, hypertension, arrhythmias, vascular calcifications and an increased risk of death in the general population and in haemodialysis patients. The composition of the dialysis fluid in terms of its magnesium concentration is one of the main determinants of magnesium in haemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: To study magnesium concentrations in haemodialysis patients, their predictive mortality rate and what factors are associated with hypomagnesaemia and mortality in haemodialysis. METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of prevalent haemodialysis patients followed up for two years. Serum magnesium was measured every six months. The analysis used the initial and average magnesium values for each patient, comparing patients with magnesium below the mean (2.1mg/dl) with those with magnesium above the mean. During the follow-up, three types of dialysis fluid were used: type 1, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l; type 3, magnesium 0.37 mmol/l (both with acetate); and type 2, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l with citrate. RESULTS: We included 137 haemodialysis patients in the study, of which 72 were male and 65 were female, with a mean age of 67 (15) [26-95] years old. Of this group, 57 patients were diabetic, 70 were on online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and 67 were on high-flow haemodialysis (HF-HD). The mean magnesium of the 93 patients with dialysis fluid type 1 was 2.18 (0.37) mg/dl. In the 27 patients with dialysis fluid type 3 it was 2.02 (0.42) mg/dl. And in the 17 with dialysis fluid type 2 it was 1.84 (0.24) mg/dl (p=.01). There was a pronounced direct relationship between Mg and P and albumin. After a mean follow-up of 16.6 (8.9) [3-24] months, 77 remained active, 24 had died and 36 had been transplanted or transferred. Patients with magnesium above than 2.1mg/dl had a longer survival (p=.008). The survival of patients with the three types of dialysis fluid did not differ significantly (Log-Rank, p=.424). Corrected for blood magnesium, patients with dialysis fluid with citrate have better survival (p=.009). The COX regression analysis shows how age, serum albumin, magnesium, dialysis technique and type of dialysis fluid have an independent predictive mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low serum magnesium levels have a greater association with an increased risk of mortality compared to high levels. The type of dialysis fluid affects the magnesium concentration and the risk of death

Haemodialysis patients have worse postural balance with an associated risk of falls. / Los pacientes en hemodiálisis presentan peor equilibrio postural, que se relaciona con el riesgo de caídas.

INTRODUCTION: Postural balance is the result of a complex interaction of sensory input which keeps us upright. Haemodialysis patients have alterations which can lead to postural instability and a risk of falls. Our objective was to analyse postural stability and its relationship with the risk of falls in haemodialysis patients using a force platform. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Postural balance was recorded using a force platform in prevalent haemodialysis patients. We collected epidemiological, dialysis, analytical and treatment data. The incidence of falls was recorded over the 6 months following the tests. The postural stability analysis was performed with a portable strain gauge platform (AMTI AccuGait®) and a specific software unit for stabilometry (Balance Trainer® program). We measured 31 balance parameters; the balance variables used were: Area95; AreaEffect; VyMax; Xrange and Yrange. The stabilometry studies were performed in 3 situations: with eyes open; with eyes closed; and with the patient performing a simultaneous task. We performed one study at the start of the dialysis session, and a second study at the end. Stabilometry was measured in a control group under similar conditions. RESULTS: We studied 32 patients with a mean age of 68 years old; of this group, 20 subjects were male and 12 were female. Their mean weight was 74kg, with a mean BMI of 27.6kg/m2. In the controls, there were no significant differences in the stabilometry between the 3 situations studied. Both pre- and post-haemodialysis, patients with closed eyes showed greater imbalance, and there were significant differences with the other situations and controls. We found a significant increase in instability after the haemodialysis session, and greater instability in the 13 patients with diabetes (P<.05). The 4 patients with hyponatraemia (Na<136mmol/l) had worse balance in the simultaneous task situation (P=.038). Various drugs, such as insulin (P=.022), antiplatelet agents (P=.036) and beta-blockers (P=.029), were associated with imbalance. The 10 patients who suffered falls had greater imbalance, Yrange, Xrange, Area95 and AreaEffect, both pre- and post-haemodialysis (P<.05) than those without falls. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients have alterations which can lead to postural instability and a risk of falls. Prevention programmes which include specific exercises to improve balance could be beneficial in reducing the risk of falls in this population.

Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid. / La hipomagnesemia en hemodiálisis se asocia a mayor riesgo de mortalidad: su relación con el líquido de diálisis.

Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis (HD) is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid (DF). INTRODUCTION: Low concentrations of magnesium (Mg) in blood have been linked to the development of diabetes, hypertension, arrhythmias, vascular calcifications and an increased risk of death in the general population and in haemodialysis patients. The composition of the dialysis fluid in terms of its magnesium concentration is one of the main determinants of magnesium in haemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: To study magnesium concentrations in haemodialysis patients, their predictive mortality rate and what factors are associated with hypomagnesaemia and mortality in haemodialysis. METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of prevalent haemodialysis patients followed up for two years. Serum magnesium was measured every six months. The analysis used the initial and average magnesium values for each patient, comparing patients with magnesium below the mean (2.1mg/dl) with those with magnesium above the mean. During the follow-up, three types of dialysis fluid were used: type 1, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l; type 3, magnesium 0.37 mmol/l (both with acetate); and type 2, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l with citrate. RESULTS: We included 137 haemodialysis patients in the study, of which 72 were male and 65 were female, with a mean age of 67 (15) [26-95] years old. Of this group, 57 patients were diabetic, 70 were on online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and 67 were on high-flow haemodialysis (HF-HD). The mean magnesium of the 93 patients with dialysis fluid type 1 was 2.18 (0.37) mg/dl. In the 27 patients with dialysis fluid type 3 it was 2.02 (0.42) mg/dl. And in the 17 with dialysis fluid type 2 it was 1.84 (0.24) mg/dl (p=.01). There was a pronounced direct relationship between Mg and P and albumin. After a mean follow-up of 16.6 (8.9) [3-24] months, 77 remained active, 24 had died and 36 had been transplanted or transferred. Patients with magnesium above than 2.1mg/dl had a longer survival (p=.008). The survival of patients with the three types of dialysis fluid did not differ significantly (Log-Rank, p=.424). Corrected for blood magnesium, patients with dialysis fluid with citrate have better survival (p=.009). The COX regression analysis shows how age, serum albumin, magnesium, dialysis technique and type of dialysis fluid have an independent predictive mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low serum magnesium levels have a greater association with an increased risk of mortality compared to high levels. The type of dialysis fluid affects the magnesium concentration and the risk of death.

[High prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 in haemodialysis: learning day by day in the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Alta prevalencia de COVID-19 asintomático en hemodiálisis. Aprendiendo día a día el primer mes de pandemia de COVID-19.

Dialysis patients are a risk group for SARS-CoV-2 infection and possibly further complications, but we have little information. The aim of this paper is to describe the experience of the first month of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a hospital haemodialysis (HD) unit serving the district of Madrid with the second highest incidence of COVID-19 (almost 1,000 patients in 100,000h). In the form of a diary, we present the actions undertaken, the incidence of COVID-19 in patients and health staff, some clinical characteristics and the results of screening all the patients in the unit. We started with 90 patients on HD: 37 (41.1%) had COVID-19, of whom 17 (45.9%) were diagnosed through symptoms detected in triage or during the session, and 15 (40.5%) through subsequent screening of those who, until that time, had not undergone SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Fever was the most frequent symptom, 50% had lymphopenia and 18.4% <95% O2 saturation. Sixteen (43.2%) patients required hospital admission and 6 (16.2%) died. We found a cluster of infection per shift and also among those using public transport. In terms of staff, of the 44 people involved, 15 (34%) had compatible symptoms, 4 (9%) were confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 PCR cases by occupational health, 9 (20%) required some period of sick leave, temporary disability to work (ILT), and 5 were considered likely cases. CONCLUSIONS: We detected a high prevalence of COVID-19 with a high percentage detected by screening; hence the need for proactive diagnosis to stop the pandemic. Most cases are managed as outpatients, however severe symptoms are also appearing and mortality to date is 16.2%. In terms of staff, 20% have required sick leave in relation to COVID-19.

El Kt/V alto, a diferencia del Kt, se asocia a mayor mortalidad: importancia de la V baja / Unlike Kt, high Kt/V is associated with greater mortality: The importance of low V

Introducción: El Kt/V se ha usado como sinónimo de dosis de hemodiálisis. La supervivencia de los pacientes mejoraba con un Kt/V > 1; este objetivo posteriormente fue elevado a 1,2 y a 1,3. En el estudio HEMO no se demostró una relación significativa entre Kt/V y la mortalidad. La relación Kt/V y mortalidad con frecuencia es una curva en "J". ¿Es la V el factor de confusión de esa relación? El objetivo de este estudio es buscar la relación de la mortalidad con el Kt/V, Kt y con el contenido de agua corporal (V) y masa magra (bioimpedancia). Métodos: Se ha estudiado una cohorte de 127 pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis seguidos durante una media de 36 meses. Se determinó el Kt por dialisancia iónica y la V y parámetros de nutrición mediante bioimpedancia. Se ha calculado el Kt/V y el Kt alcanzado corregido para superficie corporal (Ktsc) y el Ktsc objetivo. Como parámetros de hemodiálisis se ha utilizado la media de los datos de 18.998 sesiones, con una media de 155 sesiones por paciente. Resultados: La edad media fue 70,4 (15,3) años y un 61% eran hombres; 76 se dializaban mediante fístula arteriovenosa y 65 estaban en HDF-OL. Peso: 70,6 (16,8) kg; superficie corporal: 1,8 (0,25) m2; agua corporal total: 32,2 (7,4) l; índice de masa magra (LTI): 11,1 (2,7) kg/m2. El Kt/V medio fue 1,84 (0,44); Kt: 56,1 (7 )l, y el Ktsc, 52,8 (10,4) l. El Ktsc objetivo medio era de 49,7 (4,5) l. La media del Ktsc-Ktsc objetivo: +6,4 (7,0) l. Los pacientes con un Kt/V mayor tienen peor supervivencia que el resto. Con el Kt no existe esta relación. Los Kt/V mayores se deben a una V menor, con peores parámetros de nutrición. La albúmina sérica y el LTI son los parámetros que se relacionan con el riesgo de muerte de forma independiente y son menores en los pacientes con mayor Kt/V y menor V. Conclusión: El Kt/V no es útil para determinar la dosis de diálisis en pacientes con un agua corporal pequeña o disminuida. Se propone el Kt o el Ktsc como alternativa

Introduction: Kt/V has been used as a synonym for haemodialysis dose. Patient survival improved with a Kt/V > 1; this target was subsequently increased to 1.2 and 1.3. The HEMO study revealed no significant relationship between Kt/V and mortality. The relationship between Kt/V and mortality often shows a J-shaped curve. Is V the confounding factor in this relationship? The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between mortality and Kt/V, Kt and body water content (V) and lean mass (bioimpedance). Methods: We studied a cohort of 127 prevalent haemodialysis patients, who we followed-up for an average of 36 months. Kt was determined by ionic dialysance, and V and nutrition parameters by bioimpedance. Kt/V, Kt corrected for body surface area (Kt/BSA) and target Kt/BSA were calculated. The mean data from 18,998 sessions were used as haemodialysis parameters, with a mean of 155 sessions per patient. Results: Mean age was 70.4 ± 15.3 years and 61% were male; 76 were dialysed via an arteriovenous fistula and 65 were on online haemodiafiltration. Weight was 70.6 (16.8) kg; BSA 1.8 (0.25) m2; total body water (V) 32.2 (7.41) l and lean mass index (LMI) 11.1 (2.7) kg/m2. Mean Kt/V was 1.84 (0.44); Kt 56.1 (7) l and Kt/BSA 52.8 (10.4) l. The mean target Kt/BSA was 49.7 (4.5) l. Mean Kt/BSA-target Kt/BSA +6.4 (7.0) l. Patients with a higher Kt/V had worse survival rates than others; with Kt this is not the case. Higher Kt/V values are due to a lower V, with poorer nutrition parameters. LMI and serum albumin were the parameters that best independently predicted the risk of death and are lower in patients with a higher Kt/V and lower V. Conclusion: Kt/V is not useful for determining dialysis doses in patients with low or reduced body water. Kt or the Kt/BSA are proposed as an alternative

Unlike Kt, high Kt/V is associated with greater mortality: The importance of low V. / El Kt/V alto, a diferencia del Kt, se asocia a mayor mortalidad: importancia de la V baja.

INTRODUCTION: Kt/V has been used as a synonym for haemodialysis dose. Patient survival improved with a Kt/V>1; this target was subsequently increased to 1.2 and 1.3. The HEMO study revealed no significant relationship between Kt/V and mortality. The relationship between Kt/V and mortality often shows a J-shaped curve. Is V the confounding factor in this relationship? The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between mortality and Kt/V, Kt and body water content (V) and lean mass (bioimpedance). METHODS: We studied a cohort of 127 prevalent haemodialysis patients, who we followed-up for an average of 36 months. Kt was determined by ionic dialysance, and V and nutrition parameters by bioimpedance. Kt/V, Kt corrected for body surface area (Kt/BSA) and target Kt/BSA were calculated. The mean data from 18,998 sessions were used as haemodialysis parameters, with a mean of 155 sessions per patient. RESULTS: Mean age was 70.4±15.3 years and 61% were male; 76 were dialysed via an arteriovenous fistula and 65 were on online haemodiafiltration. Weight was 70.6 (16.8)kg; BSA 1.8 (0.25) m2; total body water (V) 32.2 (7.41) l and lean mass index (LMI) 11.1 (2.7)kg/m2. Mean Kt/V was 1.84 (0.44); Kt 56.1 (7)l and Kt/BSA 52.8 (10.4)l. The mean target Kt/BSA was 49.7 (4.5)l. Mean Kt/BSA-target Kt/BSA +6.4 (7.0)l. Patients with a higher Kt/V had worse survival rates than others; with Kt this is not the case. Higher Kt/V values are due to a lower V, with poorer nutrition parameters. LMI and serum albumin were the parameters that best independently predicted the risk of death and are lower in patients with a higher Kt/V and lower V. CONCLUSION: Kt/V is not useful for determining dialysis doses in patients with low or reduced body water. Kt or the Kt/BSA are proposed as an alternative.

Receta para prescribir fósforo durante hemodiálisis / Follow a recipe to prescribe phosphate during hemodialysis

La adición de fósforo (P) en el líquido de hemodiálisis (LD) mediante enema con fosfato de sodio (enema Casen®) se utiliza habitualmente en pacientes con hipofosforemia. El cálculo de la cantidad y los problemas que puede presentar no se describen en la literatura. Nuestro trabajo hace un abordaje práctico de cómo poner fósforo en LD con una fórmula razonada para calcular cuánto volumen de enema añadir en función del concentrado de diálisis utilizado y los problemas que pueden aparecer (AU)

The addition of phosphorus (P) to the dialysate (LD) in the form of enema Casen® is common practice in patients with hypophosphatemia. The estimation of the amount to be used and the identification of the problems that may can occur are not well defined. As a result of our work we propose a practical approach of how to proceed to increase phosphate concentration in the hemodialysate. We present a reasoned formula to calculate how much enema has to be added and the problems that may arise (AU)

Follow a recipe to prescribe phosphate during hemodialysis. / Receta para prescribir fósforo durante hemodiálisis.

The addition of phosphorus (P) to the dialysate (LD) in the form of enema Casen® is common practice in patients with hypophosphatemia. The estimation of the amount to be used and the identification of the problems that may can occur are not well defined. As a result of our work we propose a practical approach of how to proceed to increase phosphate concentration in the hemodialysate. We present a reasoned formula to calculate how much enema has to be added and the problems that may arise.

Is it useful to increase dialysate flow rate to improve the delivered Kt?

BACKGROUND: Increasing dialysate flow rates (Qd) from 500 to 800 ml/min has been recommended to increase dialysis efficiency. A few publications show that increasing Qd no longer led to an increase in mass transfer area coefficient (KoA) or Kt/V measurement. Our objectives were: 1) Studying the effect in Kt of using a Qd of 400, 500, 700 ml/min and autoflow (AF) with different modern dialysers. 2) Comparing the effect on Kt of water consumption vs. dialysis time to obtain an individual objective of Kt (Ktobj) adjusted to body surface. METHODS: This is a prospective single-centre study with crossover design. Thirty-one patients were studied and six sessions with each Qd were performed. HD parameters were acquired directly from the monitor display: effective blood flow rate (Qbe), Qd, effective dialysis time (Te) and measured by conductivity monitoring, final Kt. RESULTS: We studied a total of 637 sessions: 178 with 500 ml/min, 173 with 700 ml/min, 160 with AF and 126 with 400 ml/min. Kt rose a 4% comparing 400 with 500 ml/min, and 3% comparing 500 with 700 ml/min. Ktobj was reached in 82.4, 88.2, 88.2 and 94.1% of patients with 400, AF, 500 and 700 ml/min, respectively. We did not find statistical differences between dialysers. The difference between programmed time and Te was 8' when Qd was 400 and 500 ml/min and 8.8' with Qd = 700 ml/min. Calculating an average time loss of eight minutes/session, we can say that a patient loses 24' weekly, 312' monthly and 62.4 hours yearly. Identical Kt could be obtained with Qd of 400 and 500 ml/min, increasing dialysis time 9.1' and saving 20% of dialysate. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that increasing Qd over 400 ml/min for these dialysers offers a limited benefit. Increasing time is a better alternative with demonstrated benefits to the patient and also less water consumption.

Factores psicosociales y adherencia al tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes en hemodiálisis crónica / Psychosocial factors and adherence to drug treatment in patients on chronic haemodialysis

Introducción: Los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD) son uno de los colectivos que toma mayor cantidad de comprimidos en comparación con otros enfermos crónicos. La adherencia al tratamiento prescrito tiene implicaciones en la calidad de vida, la supervivencia y el coste económico de su tratamiento, siendo este último un tema prioritario de salud pública. Objetivo: Evaluar la adherencia al tratamiento farmacológico en pacientes en HD crónica examinando, entre las posibles causas de la no adherencia, factores psicosociales como depresión, ansiedad, deterioro cognitivo y apoyo social. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional transversal llevado a cabo en treinta y cinco pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica en HD, evaluados mediante cuestionarios administrados por personal especializado. Resultados: Los pacientes no adherentes presentan índices de depresión significativamente más elevados que los adherentes al tratamiento farmacológico. La ansiedad, el deterioro cognitivo y el apoyo social no muestran relación estadísticamente significativa con el grado de cumplimiento. Conclusiones: Estos resultados sugieren que la intervención psicológica en pacientes en HD con mayores índices de depresión podría aumentar el grado de cumplimiento y bienestar general del enfermo renal (AU)

Background: The daily pill burden in hemodialysis patients is one of the highest reported to date in any chronic disease. The adherence to prescribed treatment has implications on the quality of life, the survival of patients, and the economic cost of their treatment, this being a priority public health issue. Objective: To evaluate the adherence to pharmacological treatment examining, among the possible causes of non-adherence, psychosocial factors such as depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment and social support. Method: Transversal-observational study of thirty five patients that suffer from chronic renal disease and who are on manteinance hemodialysis, evaluated by self-reported measures. Results: Non-adherent patients have significant higher depression index than adherent patients. Anxiety, cognitive impairment and social support do not show a significant relation with the degree of adherence or compliance with farmacological treatment. Conclusions: These results suggest that psychological intervention in chronic haemodialysis patients with a severe depression index could increase the degree of fulfillment and general well-being of renal patients (AU)

Psychosocial factors and adherence to drug treatment in patients on chronic haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The daily pill burden in hemodialysis patients is one of the highest reported to date in any chronic disease. The adherence to prescribed treatment has implications on the quality of life, the survival of patients, and the economic cost of their treatment, this being a priority public health issue. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adherence to pharmacological treatment examining, among the possible causes of non-adherence, psychosocial factors such as depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment and social support. METHOD: Transversal-observational study of thirty five patients that suffer from chronic renal disease and who are on manteinance hemodialysis, evaluated by self-reported measures. RESULTS: Non-adherent patients have significant higher depression index than adherent patients. Anxiety, cognitive impairment and social support do not show a significant relation with the degree of adherence or compliance with farmacological treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that psychological intervention in chronic haemodialysis patients with a severe depression index could increase the degree of fulfillment and general well-being of renal patients.

Hiperpotasemia en pacientes hospitalizados. ¿Cómo evitarla? / Hyperkalaemia in hospitalised patients. How to avoid it?

No disponible

Comparación de la eficacia de dos modalidades de hemodiafiltración en línea: mixta frente a posdilucional / A comparison of the effectiveness of two online haemodiafiltration modalities: mixed versus post-dilution

Introducción: La hemodiafiltración (HDF) con altos volúmenes de reinfusión es la técnica más eficaz en la depuración de toxinas urémicas. Existen distintas modalidades dependiendo del lugar donde se administra el volumen de sustitución en el circuito extracorpóreo: predilucional, mixta o mid-dilucional y posdilucional, en las que la infusión se realiza pre, de forma simultánea pre y pos, y posdilucional, respectivamente. Objetivo: Comparar la depuración de moléculas pequeñas, medianas y unidas a proteínas y el volumen convectivo administrado en HDF en línea (HDF-OL) con infusión posdilucional y mixta (pre-posdilucional). Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y cruzado, comparando HDF-OL posdilucional y mixta. Los pacientes (n = 8) fueron asignados aleatoriamente para recibir 6 sesiones en cada técnica. Se realizaron 89 sesiones, de las cuales 68 fueron a tiempo programado (TP) y 21 a tiempo efectivo (TE). Se determinaron los porcentajes de reducción (RR) de distintas sustancias y los volúmenes de infusión. El estudio de los RR se realizó con TE. Resultados: El KT obtenido fue mayor con HDF-OL posdilucional [68 (8,1) frente a 64,9 (8,8) litros] (p = 0,009) cuando los pacientes se dializaron a TP. Esta diferencia desaparecía cuando la diálisis se realizaba a TE. La diferencia entre el TP-TE fue mayor en la HDF mixta con respecto a la HDF posdilucional [10,3 (7,4) frente a 6,5 (3,1) minutos, p = 0,02]. No encontramos diferencias en los RR de las sustancias analizadas. Conclusión: La HDF-OL mixta no es inferior a la posdilucional ni en la depuración de moléculas pequeñas y medianas ni en las unidas a proteínas a igual TE (AU)

Introduction: Haemodiafiltration (HDF) with high reinfusion volumes is the most effective technique for clearing uraemic toxins. There are various modalities depending on the location where the replacement volume is administered in the extracorporeal circuit: pre-dilution, mixed or mid-dilution and post-dilution, in which the infusion is carried out pre-dilution, pre- and post-dilution simultaneously and post-dilution, respectively. Objective: Compare the clearance of small, medium-sized and protein-bound molecules and the convective volume administered in online HDF (OL-HDF) in post-dilution and mixed (pre-post-dilution) infusion. Material and method: A prospective, randomised, crossover study comparing post-dilution and mixed OL-HDF. Patients (n=8) were randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions in each technique. We conducted 89 sessions, of which 68 were at a scheduled time (ST) and 21 at an effective time (ET). We determined the reduction rate (RR) percentages for various substances and the infusion volumes. The RR study was performed using ET. Results: The KT value obtained was greater with post-dilution OL-HDF [68 (8.1) compared to 64.9 (8.8) litres] (P=.009) when patients were dialysed at ST. This difference disappeared when dialysis was performed at ET. The difference between ST and ET was greater in mixed HDF than in post-dilution HDF [10.3 (7.4) compared to 6.5 (3.1) minutes, P=.02]. We found no differences in the RR of the substances analysed. Conclusion: Mixed OL-HDF is not inferior to post-dilution OL-HDF either in the clearance of small and medium-sized molecules or in the clearance of protein-bound molecules at the same ET (AU)

Set-point de sodio en hemodiálisis: ¿es lo que vemos en la clínica? / Sodium set-point in haemodialysis: is it what we see clinically?

Introducción: La natremia en los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD) se considera constante, contrariamente a lo observado en la clínica diaria. Su relación con parámetros clínicos, de diálisis y con la distribución del agua corporal (AC) no está aclarada. Objetivos: Estudiar: 1) la variabilidad intrasujeto de la natremia, 2) la relación entre natremia y parámetros clínicos y dialíticos y 3) la relación entre natremia y distribución del AC por bioimpedancia. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de 98 pacientes en HD crónica. Se recogieron características clínicas, de HD, natremia, glucemia y medidas de bioimpedancia. Resultados: Sesenta y tres varones y 35 mujeres de 69,6 (21-91) años con seguimiento de 23,2 (10) meses. Variabilidad: 1802 determinaciones de sodio: natremia media 138 (3,2) y corregida para glucemia: 139,1 (3,6) mEq/l, p < 0,0001. El coeficiente de variación (CV) intrasujeto fue 2 (0,8) % (rango: 1-5,6 %) y correlacionó negativamente con la natremia (r = -0,63, p < 0,0001). Parámetros clínicos: en diabéticos la natremia corregida era inferior a en no-diabéticos 138 (2,4) frente a 139 (2) mEq/l, p < 0,003, con CV de 2,3 (0,9) frente a 1,9 (0,7) % (p < 0,01) y desviación estándar de 3,2 (1,2) frente a 2,5 (0,9) mEq/l (p < 0,04). No encontramos diferencias según sexo, edad, tiempo en diálisis, cardiopatía, hepatopatía, fármacos, función renal residual ni mortalidad. Parámetros de HD: relación positiva entre natremia y conductividad del líquido de diálisis y negativa con ganancia de peso interdiálisis (GID). Bioimpedancia: no relación entre distribución AC y natremia. Conclusiones: La natremia varía en cada paciente y se relaciona positivamente con la conductividad y negativamente con la GID. En diabéticos la natremia es más baja y el CV es mayor. No existe relación entre natremia y la distribución del AC (AU)

Background: Natraemia in haemodialysis (HD) patients is considered constant contrary to daily clinical observations. Its relationship with clinical parameters, dialysis parameters and body water (BW) distribution is not clear. Objectives: The aims of this study were to know 1) the intraindividual variability of natraemia, 2) the relationship between natraemia and clinical and dialysis parameters and 3) the relationship between natraemia and BW distribution by bioimpedance. Material and Method: Observational retrospective study on 98 chronic HD patients. Clinical, HD and natraemia, glucose and bioimpedance data were collected. Results: We included 63 males and 35 females of 69.6 (21-91) years of age, with a follow-up of 23.2 (10) months. Variability: 1802 sodium measurements: mean natraemia 138 (3.2) mEq/l and corrected for glucose: 139.1 (3.6) mEq/l, p<.0001. Intraindividual coefficient of variation (CV) was 2% (0.8) (range 1-5.6%) and it correlated negatively with natraemia (r=-0.63, p<.0001). Clinical parameters: corrected natraemia was lower in diabetics than in non-diabetics 138 (2.4) compared with 139 (2) mEq/l, p<.003, CV 2.3 (0.9) compared with 1.9 (0.7)% (p<.01) and SD 3.2 (1.2) compared with 2.5 (0.9) mEq/l (p<.04). No differences according to gender, age, HD time, cardiac or liver disease, medication use, residual renal function or mortality were found. HD parameters: a positive relationship was found between natraemia and total dialysate conductivity and it was negative with interdialysis weight gain (IDG). - Bioimpedance: no relationship was found between natraemia and BW distribution. Conclusions: Natraemia varies in each patient and is related positively with conductivity and negatively with IDG. In diabetics natraemia is lower and CV is higher. There is no relationship between natraemia and BW distribution (AU)

A comparison of the effectiveness of two online haemodiafiltration modalities: mixed versus post-dilution.

INTRODUCTION: Haemodiafiltration (HDF) with high reinfusion volumes is the most effective technique for clearing uraemic toxins. There are various modalities depending on the location where the replacement volume is administered in the extracorporeal circuit: pre-dilution, mixed or mid-dilution and post-dilution, in which the infusion is carried out pre-dilution, pre- and post-dilution simultaneously and post-dilution, respectively. OBJECTIVE: Compare the clearance of small, medium-sized and protein-bound molecules and the convective volume administered in online HDF (OL-HDF) in post-dilution and mixed (pre-post-dilution) infusion. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective, randomised, crossover study comparing post-dilution and mixed OL-HDF. Patients (n=8) were randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions in each technique. We conducted 89 sessions, of which 68 were at a scheduled time (ST) and 21 at an effective time (ET). We determined the reduction rate (RR) percentages for various substances and the infusion volumes. The RR study was performed using ET. RESULTS: The KT value obtained was greater with post-dilution OL-HDF [68 (8.1) compared to 64.9 (8.8) litres] (P=.009) when patients were dialysed at ST. This difference disappeared when dialysis was performed at ET. The difference between ST and ET was greater in mixed HDF than in post-dilution HDF [10.3 (7.4) compared to 6.5 (3.1) minutes, P=.02]. We found no differences in the RR of the substances analysed. CONCLUSION: Mixed OL-HDF is not inferior to post-dilution OL-HDF either in the clearance of small and medium-sized molecules or in the clearance of protein-bound molecules at the same ET.