RESUMEN
With the increased understanding of the relationship between stress and disease, the role of stress in explaining persistent disparities in health outcomes has received growing attention. One body of research has focused on allostatic load--the "wear and tear" that results from chronic or excessive activation of the stress response. Other research has looked at the link between stress and health behaviors. In this study, we conducted 7 focus groups with a total of 56 people to understand how people living in Highbridge, South Bronx, New York, a low income community with poor health outcomes, perceive stress and its relationship to health. Focus group participants described a direct causal pathway between stress and poor health as well as an indirect pathway through health behaviors, including uncontrolled eating, sleep deprivation, substance abuse, smoking, violence and aggression, and withdrawal and inactivity. Participants articulated a number of theories about why stress leads to these unhealthy behaviors, including self-medication, adaptive behavior, discounting the future, depletion of willpower, and competing priorities. Their nuanced understanding of the link between stress and health elucidates the mechanisms and pathways by which stress may result in disparities in health outcomes and create challenges in changing health behaviors in poor communities like the South Bronx.
Asunto(s)
Pobreza/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Apoyo Social , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PROBLEM: People of color suffer worse health outcomes than their White counterparts due, in part, to limited access to high-quality specialty care. PURPOSE: This article describes the events that led to the Bronx Health REACH coalition's decision to file a civil rights complaint with the New York State Office of the Attorney General alleging that three academic medical centers in New York City discriminated on the basis of payer status and race in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Hill-Burton Act, New York State regulations, and New York City Human Rights Law. KEY POINTS: Although the problem has not yet been resolved, the related community mobilization efforts have raised public awareness about the impact of disparate care, strengthened the coalition's commitment to achieve health equality, and garnered support among many city and state legislators. CONCLUSION: Community groups and professionals with relevant expertise can tackle complex systemic problems, but they must be prepared for a long and difficult fight.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pacientes no Asegurados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Negro o Afroamericano , Derechos Civiles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación de la Comunidad , Federación para Atención de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Pacientes no Asegurados/etnología , Grupos Minoritarios , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Prejuicio , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This case study provides a mid-course assessment of the Bronx Health REACH faith-based initiative four years into its implementation. The study uses qualitative methods to identify lessons learned and to reflect on the benefits and challenges of using a community-based participatory approach for the development and evaluation of a faith-based program designed to address health disparities. Key findings concern the role of pastoral leadership, the importance of providing a religious context for health promotion and health equality messages, the challenges of creating a bilingual/bi-cultural program, and the need to provide management support to the lay program coordinators. The study also identifies lessons learned about community-based evaluation and the importance of addressing community concern about the balance between evaluation and program. Finally, the study identifies the challenges that lie ahead, including issues of program institutionalization and sustainability.