[First-line treatment with pemetrexed in association with cisplatin in patients with non-operable malignant pleural mesothelioma]. / Association pemetrexed-cisplatine en première ligne dans le mésothéliome pleural malin non opérable.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. The optimal treatment of MPM was not clearly defined, until the publication of the multicentre, controlled and randomized phase III trial by Vogelzang et al. in 2003, which made the pemetrexed-cisplatin association the gold standard for the non-operable stages. Eleven patients with histologically proven pleural mesothelioma, not candidates for curative surgery, were assessed for eligibility and treated in our hospital. The response rate was similar to the reference study and the toxicity was acceptable. The median survival time was 12.7 months with an objective response rate of 45.5%. The median time to progression was 7.7 months. Neutropenia (all grades included) was the most common haematological toxicity (42.1%) although only one grade 3/4 was noted. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia were not reported. Nausea and vomiting were the most commonly reported clinical toxicities with 81.8% reported (all grades included). One cutaneous allergic reaction was reported. The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin chemotherapy provided the best objectives responses, but new therapeutic regimens are still warranted for these patients with a poor prognosis. The results were similar to those obtained in the Vogelzang et al.'s trial despite a selection bias because they correspond to 36.7% of the total recruitment in the unit.

[Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of stage I or II primary bronchial cancers treated exclusively with radiotherapy]. / Standards, Options et Recommandations pour la prise en charge des patients atteints d'un cancer bronchique primitif de stade I ou II traités par irradiation exclusive.

CONTEXT: The 'Standards, Options and Recommendations' (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French cancer centres and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the management of stage I and II non small cell lung carcinoma treated by radiotherapy alone. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to independent reviewers, and to the medical committees of the 20 French cancer centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the management of stage I and II non small cell lung carcinoma treated by radiotherapy alone are: 1) The curative external irradiation with a continual course is an alternative to surgery only in the case of medically inoperable tumors or because the patient refuses surgery; 2) The external irradiation of the primary tumor only without the mediastinum could be proposed in peripheral stage IA. In proximal stage IA and IB, external irradiation should be carried out only as part of prospective randomised controlled trials comparing a localised irradiation of the primary tumor with a large irradiation of the mediastinum and the primary tumor. The treated volume must include the macroscopic tumoral volume with or without the microscopic tumoral volume and with a security margin from 1.5 to 2 cm; 3) There is a benefit to delivering a total dose in the primary tumor higher than 60 Gy in so far as the proposed irradiation, taking into account the respiratory function, does not increase the likelihood of severe adverse events due to radiation; and 4) The change in fractionation, the radiochemotherapy combination, the endobronchial brachytherapy with high dose rate alone or with external irradiation could be proposed only as part of prospective controlled trials for tumors classified as stage IB or II.

[Standards, options and recommendations for the management of locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma]. / Standards, otions et recommandationspour la prise en charge thérapeutique des patients atteints d'un cancer bronchopulmonaire primitif non à petites cellules localement avancé.

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project for the management of locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline and the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to independent reviewers and to the medical committees of the 20 French Cancer Centres. RESULTS: The main recommendations are: 1) The management of the locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma has two main goals: firstly to obtain local control of the disease (or to at least delay local progression in order to improve the survival or relapse free survival), and secondly to prevent the development of metastases. 2) There is a consensus that locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma should be irradiated. External beam radiotherapy should be of optimal quality and delivered at a minimal dose of 60 Gy by standard fractionation. For patients with a poor life expectancy, this can be delivered as a split-course or hypofractionated scheme. 3) Treatment for patients with a performance status of 0-1 should consist of short duration induction chemotherapy (with a least two drugs one of which must be cisplatin), combined sequentially with conventional radiotherapy. 4) Surgery is contraindicated in extensive N3 disease. Combined radio-chemotherapy (adjuvant or neoadjuvant) is not indicated outside clinical trials. Surgery is justified in stage N2 disease as good local control can be achieved. T4-N0 disease should be treated surgically with curative intent.