RESUMEN
The current method for goat brucellosis diagnosis is based on the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) using the screening card test (CT), with antigen at 8% (CT8) or 3% (CT3) of cell concentrations, and the confirmatory complement fixation test (CFT). However, these tests do not differentiate antibodies induced by vaccination from those derived from field infections by Brucella species or other bacterial agents; in places like Mexico, where the prevalence of brucellosis and the vaccination rates are high, there is a considerable percentage of false positive reactions that causes significant unnecessary slaughter of animals. Furthermore, results of the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) using the Brucella abortus O-polysaccharide (OPS) tracer in goats are poorer than those with cattle. The present study was undertaken to investigate a tracer prepared from the native hapten (NH) of the Rev. 1 strain of Brucella melitensis to improve FPA performance on goat brucellosis diagnosis. Evaluation of 48 positive samples and 96 negative samples showed that the NH tracer was more accurate (p<0.01) than the OPS tracer (97.2% vs. 93.8% accuracy, respectively). On the diagnostic performance evaluation, the NH tracer performed better (87.5% accuracy, 79.5% sensitivity, 84.3% specificity, and 163.8 performance index) than the OPS tracer (83.5%, 75.9%, 81.0%, and 156.9, respectively) using 1009 positive and 2039 negative Mexican field goat sera samples selected by test series approved by the OIE (card test 3% and CFT). We demonstrated a new application for the NH lipopolysaccharide on detecting antibodies against Brucella using the FPA, which may yield faster results (minutes vs. 24-72h) than the immunodiagnosis assays frequently used in bovine brucellosis. In addition, NH tracer produces similar or better performance results than the conventional OPS tracer, using the FPA in goat sera samples.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Brucella melitensis/inmunología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Inmunoensayo de Polarización Fluorescente/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Cabras/microbiología , Haptenos/química , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Brucella abortus/inmunología , Brucella melitensis/química , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/inmunología , Brucelosis/microbiología , Bovinos , Fluoresceína-5-Isotiocianato/química , Inmunoensayo de Polarización Fluorescente/métodos , Colorantes Fluorescentes/química , Enfermedades de las Cabras/sangre , Enfermedades de las Cabras/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Cabras/inmunología , Cabras , Haptenos/inmunología , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
The screening Rose Bengal test (RBT), the buffered plate agglutination test (BPAT), and the confirmatory complement fixation test (CFT) are currently approved by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) for diagnosis of goat brucellosis. However, RBT (at 3% or 8% cell concentration) is known to be affected by vaccinal antibodies. In the present study, Mexican and Canadian OIE tests were compared with the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), alone or in combination, using indirect and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as classification variables for goat sera obtained from an area of high prevalence and widespread vaccination. The relative sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 99.7% and 32.5% for RBT3, 92.8% and 68.8% for RBT8, 98.4% and 84.8% for Canadian CFT, 83.7% and 65.5% for Mexican CFT, and 78.1% and 89.3% for FPA. The use of FPA as the confirmatory test in combination with other tests significantly increased the final specificities of the screening tests alone; BPAT, RBT3, and RBT8 plus FPA resulted in final specificities of 90%, 91.2%, and 91.3%, respectively, whereas for the combinations RBT3 plus Mexican CFT, RBT8 plus Mexican CFT, and BPAT plus Canadian CFT, specificities were 65.5%, 63.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. We suggest that FPA may be routinely applied as an adaptable screening test for diagnosis of goat brucellosis and as a confirmatory test for screening test series. Some advantages of FPA are that its cutoff can be adjusted to improve its sensitivity or specificity, it is a low-cost and easy-to-perform test of choice when specificity is relevant or when an alternative confirmatory test is not available, and it is not affected by vaccination, thus reducing the number of misdiagnosed and killed goats.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacuna contra la Brucelosis/inmunología , Brucella melitensis/inmunología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Inmunoensayo de Polarización Fluorescente/métodos , Vacunación/veterinaria , Animales , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Pruebas de Fijación del Complemento , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Cabras , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
An evaluation of fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) to detect antibodies against Brucella melitensis according to the Mexican Official Norm (NOM) was performed. In this study, a total of 2582 goat serum samples from a high-prevalence area in northeast Mexico where vaccination is applied, were used. Of these, 1094 were classified as NOM negatives (card test (CT) negatives or CT positives/complement fixation test (CFT) negatives) and 1488 as NOM positives (CT and CFT positives). The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to obtain the FPA sensitivity (83.5%), specificity (82.2%) and accuracy (88.2%) compared with NOM criteria, using a cut-off value of 89mP for positive samples. In addition, FPA produced 84.1% of negative results versus 65.7% of CT using 1094 CFT negative samples, which indicated that FPA performance was better than CT to detect negative samples or differentiate samples from vaccinated animals. Finally, FPA showed 95.8% sensitivity when using 702 negative non-vaccinated samples. Taken together, these results suggested that FPA might replace CT as a screening test for its better performance compared with CFT, its adjustable cut-off useful in different epidemiological situations, and for its reliability, ease of performance, comparable cost with CT regimen, and potential application in field and high-throughput laboratories. The use of FPA as screening test will help to reduce the percentage of goats wrongly slaughtered because of brucellosis misdiagnosis. More studies on FPA are required for its approval as diagnostic tool for goat brucellosis.
Asunto(s)
Brucella melitensis/aislamiento & purificación , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Cabras/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Cabras/microbiología , Pruebas de Aglutinación/veterinaria , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Área Bajo la Curva , Brucelosis/microbiología , Pruebas de Fijación del Complemento/veterinaria , Polarización de Fluorescencia/métodos , Polarización de Fluorescencia/veterinaria , Cabras , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Bacteriological investigation of canine brucellosis in Mexico City revealed a high rate (11.8%) of Brucella canis infection in a sampling of 59 stray dogs. When conservative criteria were employed in the interpretation of serological test results, there was general agreement between the serological and bacteriological findings; however, some animals with localized male genital tract infections could not be judged as infected solely by serological tests. All Mexican field isolates were identified as B. canis; however, some diversity was observed as regards nitrate reduction, growth in the presence of basic fuchsine, and the degree of mucoidness. The seemingly high prevalence of B. canis infection in Mexico City dogs suggests the need for further inquiry into the possible public health significance.