Incidence of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children and adolescents in the UK and Republic of Ireland.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO), also known as chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO), is a rare autoinflammatory condition affecting the bones in children and teenagers. The actual incidence of CRMO remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to identify the incidence of CRMO in children and young people under the age of 16 years in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI). We also aim to delineate the demographics, clinical presentation, investigations, initial management and healthcare needs for children and adolescents with CRMO. METHODS: We conducted monthly surveys among all paediatric consultants and paediatric orthopaedic surgeons to identify patients newly diagnosed with CRMO between October 2020 and November 2022. A standardised questionnaire was sent to reporting clinicians to collect further information. RESULTS: Over the surveillance period, 288 patients were reported, among which, 165 confirmed and 20 probable cases were included in the analysis. The highest incidences were among 8-10 year-olds. A two-to-one female-to-male difference in incidence was observed, and male patients were more likely to present with multifocal disease. A negative correlation was observed between reporting clavicular and leg pain. Investigation-wise, 80.0% of patients were reported to have undergone whole-body MRI and 51.1% had bone biopsies. The most common initial treatments were NSAIDs (93.9%) and bisphosphonates (44.8%). CONCLUSION: This study estimates an average annual CRMO incidence of 0.65 cases per 100 000 children and adolescents in the UK and ROI. These findings establish a crucial baseline for ongoing research and improvement in the care of individuals with CRMO.

Use of immunomodulators in non-infectious uveitis: lights and shadows.

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of sight impairment worldwide. Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for acute NIU, although their known systemic and ocular side effects limit their long-term use. The most common types of immunosuppressants used as steroid-sparing treatment are non-biologic drugs, particularly antimetabolites (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine) and biologic drugs, mainly TNF-α inhibitors such as Adalimumab or Infliximab. Antimetabolites have shown their effectiveness in the treatment of NIU in individual and comparative studies, being methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil usually preferred over azathioprine. The choice of which antimetabolite to use at first is not well defined, and decisions usually depend on the patient's characteristics and the physician's preferences. Treatment of NIU with biologic drugs, and particularly TNF-α inhibitors, has significantly increased in the last years and is considered an important alternative in patients not responding to first-line immunomodulators such as antimetabolites. However, data regarding how different immunomodulators or biologic drugs perform in different NIU is still limited, and little is known about the optimization of both biologic and non-biologic drugs when used in NIU. Further randomized clinical trials and comparative studies are required to achieve more understanding and better results when addressing complicated NIU. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of non-biologic and biologic drugs in NIU, which may be useful for clinicians in their daily practice, and to address those aspects that are less known about these treatments as well as their weaknesses.

Management of JIA associated uveitis.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood, and is associated with uveitis in up to 20-25% of cases. Typically, the uveitis is chronic, asymptomatic, non-granulomatous and anterior. For this reason, screening for uveitis is recommended to identify uveitis early and allow treatment to prevent sight-threatening complications. The management of JIA associated uveitis requires a multidisciplinary approach and a close collaboration between paediatric rheumatologist and ophthalmologist. Starting the appropriate treatment to control uveitis activity and prevent ocular complications is crucial. Current international recommendations advise a step-wise approach, starting with methotrexate and moving on to adalimumab if methotrexate alone is not sufficient to control the disease. If the uveitis remains active despite standard treatment other therapeutic options may be considered including anti-IL6 or other anti-TNF agents such as infliximab, although the evidence for these agents is limited.

Integration of genetic and clinical risk factors improves the risk classification of uveitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis (JIAU) is a serious JIA comorbidity that can result in vision impairment. This study aimed to identify genetic risk factors, within the major histocompatibility complex , for JIAU and evaluate their contribution for improving risk classification when combined with clinical risk factors. METHODS: Data on single nucleotide polymorphisms, amino acids and classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles were available for 2,497 JIA patients without uveitis and 579 JIAU patients (female=2060, male=1015). Analysis was restricted to patients with inferred European ancestry. Forward conditional logistic regression identified genetic markers exceeding a Bonferroni corrected significance (6x10-6). Multivariable logistic regression estimated the effects of clinical and genetic risk factors and a likelihood ratio test calculated the improvement in model fit when adding genetic factors. Uveitis risk classification performance of a model integrating genetic and clinical risk factors was estimated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and compared to a model of clinical risk factors alone. RESULTS: Three genetic risk factors were identified mapping to HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPB1 and HLA-A. These markers were statistically independent from clinical risk factors and significantly improved the fit of a model when included with clinical risk factors (P = 3.3x10-23). The addition of genetic markers improved the classification of JIAU compared to a model of clinical risk factors alone (AUC 0.75 vs. 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of a genetic and clinical risk prediction model outperforms a model based solely on clinical risk factors. Future JIAU risk prediction models should include genetic risk factors.

Update on ocular manifestations of the main monogenic and polygenic autoinflammatory diseases.

Autoinflammatory diseases include disorders with a genetic cause and also complex syndromes associated to polygenic or multifactorial factors. Eye involvement is present in many of them, with different extent and severity. The present review covers ophthalmological lesions in the most prevalent monogenic autoinflammatory diseases, including FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (TNF receptor-associated periodic syndrome), CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes), Blau syndrome, DADA2 (deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2), DITRA (deficiency of the interleukin-36 receptor antagonist), other monogenic disorders, including several ubiquitinopathies, interferonopathies, and the recently described ROSAH (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve edema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, and headache) syndrome, and VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome. Among polygenic autoinflammatory diseases, ocular manifestations have been reviewed in Behçet's disease, PFAPA (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis) syndrome, Still's disease and autoinflammatory bone diseases, which encompass CRMO (chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis) and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis) syndrome.

Novel therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarises the major novel treatment options for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) since the pandemic, reflecting not only on advancements in therapeutics but also approach to management and research. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent international paediatric trials have been important in advancing understanding of JIA and furthering available treatment options. Biologic and small molecule agents were demonstrated to be effective and safe in recalcitrant or severe JIA (including extra-articular complications), mirroring the adult equivalent diseases. SUMMARY: Although joint and overall health have vastly improved for young people with JIA, ongoing international collaboration, critical review of treatment strategies and high quality research are essential to optimize outcomes.

Of oranges and lemons: you are what you eat.

A young boy presented with increasing lower limb pain and swelling for a month. At the time of his hospitalisation, he was unable to walk. We report the patient's clinical journey with clinical commentary throughout, highlighting the importance that uncommon diseases may be diagnosed with a high index of suspicion and thorough history taking.

British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.

Sjögren disease (SD) is a chronic, autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology with significant impact on quality of life. Although dryness (sicca) of the eyes and mouth are the classically described features, dryness of other mucosal surfaces and systemic manifestations are common. The key management aim should be to empower the individual to manage their condition-conserving, replacing and stimulating secretions; and preventing damage and suppressing systemic disease activity. This guideline builds on and widens the recommendations developed for the first guideline published in 2017. We have included advice on the management of children and adolescents where appropriate to provide a comprehensive guideline for UK-based rheumatology teams.

How can trial designs better serve the needs of children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

In juvenile idiopathic arthritis we have seen remarkable progress in the number of available licensed biological and small molecule treatments in the past two decades, leading to improved outcomes for patients. Designing clinical trials for these therapeutics is fraught with ethical, legislative, and practical challenges. However, many aspects of current clinical trial design in juvenile idiopathic arthritis do not meet the needs of patients and clinicians. Commonly used withdrawal trial designs raise substantial ethical concerns for patients and families who believe that they do not enable evidence-based and patient-centred decisions around medication choices. In this Viewpoint, we present the personal views of a patient and parent network that is of the opinion that current trial design in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is failing children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and set out the need for change informed by lived experience.

Tofacitinib for Refractory Uveitis and Scleritis in Children: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: This study analyzes the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in pediatric patients presenting with treatment-resistant uveitis and scleritis. METHOD: Retrospective Chart Review. RESULT: Nine children diagnosed with uveitis and one with scleritis received oral tofacitinib treatment. The median age of these patients was 9 years, with bilateral involvement observed in nine of them. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis was the most identifiable cause of uveitis, with anterior uveitis (50%) being the most frequent subtype of inflammation among these children. The median duration of immunosuppressive treatment before switching to tofacitinib was 18 (16-49) months. Remission of uveitis was achieved in all but two children, who experienced recurrence - manifesting as anterior uveitis. The median duration of follow-up in these children after tofacitinib treatment was 277.5 (183-549) days. At the end of follow-up, topical steroids could be withdrawn in six children, and two children were on topical steroids once a day. None of the children developed any systemic side-effect during the follow-up period. The mean BCVA at presentation was 0.62 ± 0.55, which improved to a mean of 0.27 ± 0.325 at the final follow-up (p = 0.0014). CONCLUSION: Treatment of pediatric uveitis with tofacitinib can be a valuable second-line treatment option and useful alternative in low- and middle-income countries.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab in clinical trials of polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC-TCZ) treatment in a long-term extension (LTE) of clinical trials in polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA, sJIA). METHODS: Patients with pJIA or sJIA from two open-label, 52-week phase 1 b core trials of SC-TCZ who had adequate response per investigator assessment entered the LTE and continued SC-TCZ treatment according to body weight-based dosing regimens until commercial availability or up to 5 years. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were assessed for up to 3 years and safety for up to 5 years in the LTE. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with pJIA and 38 patients with sJIA entered the LTE. Tocilizumab trough concentrations were maintained within the range expected to provide clinical benefit (mean values: pJIA, ∼10 µg/ml; sJIA, ∼75 µg/ml over 3 years). Pharmacodynamic parameters (interleukin-6, soluble interleukin-6 receptor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) were maintained throughout the LTE at levels achieved in the core trials. Inactive disease per American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria was reported for 90% (17/19) and 53% (8/15) of patients with pJIA and 91% (10/11) and 92% (12/13) of patients with sJIA in the <30 kg and ≥30 kg body weight groups, respectively. Serious adverse events in the LTE were reported in six patients with pJIA (13.6%; five serious infections) and five patients with sJIA (13.2%; one serious infection). CONCLUSION: Patients with pJIA or sJIA experienced long-term disease control with SC-TCZ treatment. Long-term safety was consistent with the known tocilizumab safety profile.

Long-Term Visual Outcome of Patients with Blau Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To document the long-term visual outcomes in patients with Blau syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective institutional cohort study was conducted, and 13 patients with genetically confirmed Blau syndrome were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected from standardised medical charts. Baseline was defined as the first detected uveitis and data were recorded onwards at intervals of 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years. RESULTS: Anterior uveitis was the most common classification at baseline (57.1%). Among patients with documented uveitis lasting 10 years or more, all of them developed panuveitis. Median logMAR visual acuity at baseline was 0 (range -0.5; 0.7), 0.19 (range 0; 1.5) at year 5, and 0.7 (range 0.1 - no perception of light) at year 20, as recorded in 13, 16, and 10 eyes, respectively. All patients received treatment with topical and oral steroids, and multiple systemic immunosuppressants including biologics. Disease control, defined as having cells <1+ in both eyes and using topical steroid eye drops less than twice daily, was achieved in 14.3% to 37.5% of patients at the different time points. Cataract surgery was performed in 12 eyes of 8 patients, 3 eyes of 3 patients necessitated glaucoma surgery, and 4 eyes of 4 patients required surgery for retinal detachment. CONCLUSION: Uveitis associated with Blau syndrome commonly leads to severe, chronic panuveitis, requiring long-term systemic immunosuppression. Early diagnosis and timely initiation of biologics may prevent significant visual impairment.

Childhood Chronic Idiopathic Uveitis in a Multicentre International Cohort.

IMPORTANCE: Idiopathic uveitis makes up around 50% of non-infectious uveitis but the clinical characteristics in children are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To report the demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of children with idiopathic non-infectious uveitis (iNIU) in a multicentric retrospective study. RESULTS: There were 126 (61 female) children with iNIU. The median age at diagnosis was 9.3 years (3-16 years) . Uveitis was bilateral in 106 patients and anterior in 68.At onset,impaired visual acuity and blindness in the worse eye were reported, in 24.4% and 15.1% patients but at 3 years of follow-up, there was a significant improvement in visual acuity (mean 0.11 SD ±0.50 vs 0.42 SD ± 0.59 p < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is a high rate of visual impairment at presentation in children with idiopathic uveitis. The majority of patients have a significant improvement in vision, but 1 in 6 had impaired vision or blindness in their worse eye at 3 years.

This is a large retrospective study of children with chronic idiopathic uveitis,There is a high rate of visual impairment at presentation in children with idiopathic uveitis. Although visual acuity improves during follow-up, one in six still had impaired vision or blindness in their worse eye at 3 years.At 3 years, more than half of patients were on immunosuppression and one-third were on a biologic agent.

Phenotypic Variability in PRKCD: a Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: Protein kinase C δ (PKCδ) deficiency is a rare genetic disorder identified as a monogenic cause of systemic lupus erythematosus in 2013. Since the first cases were described, the phenotype has expanded to include children presenting with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome-related syndromes and infection susceptibility similar to chronic granulomatous disease or combined immunodeficiency. We review the current published data regarding the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, investigation and management of PKCδ deficiency. METHODS: Literature review was performed using MEDLINE. RESULTS: Twenty cases have been described in the literature with significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The variation in clinical presentation delineates the broad and critical role of PKCδ in immune tolerance and effector functions against pathogens.

Global Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Pediatric Clinical Trial Publication.

This cross-sectional study investigates the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with rates of pediatric clinical trial publication.

Baricitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis can be refractory to some or all treatment regimens, therefore new medications are needed to treat this population. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase 1/2-selective inhibitor, versus placebo in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. METHODS: This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial was conducted in 75 centres in 20 countries. We enrolled patients (aged 2 to <18 years) with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (positive or negative for rheumatoid factor), extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, or juvenile psoriatic arthritis, and an inadequate response (after ≥12 weeks of treatment) or intolerance to one or more conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The trial consisted of a 2-week safety and pharmacokinetic period, a 12-week open-label lead-in period (10 weeks for the safety and pharmacokinetic subcohort), and an up to 32-week placebo-controlled double-blind withdrawal period. After age-based dosing was established in the safety and pharmacokinetic period, patients received a once-daily 4 mg adult-equivalent dose of baricitinib (tablets or suspension) in the open-label lead-in period. Patients meeting Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-American College of Rheumatology (JIA-ACR) 30 criteria (JIA-ACR30 responders) at the end of the open-label lead-in (week 12) were eligible for random assignment (1:1) to receive placebo or continue receiving baricitinib, and remained in the double-blind withdrawal period until disease flare or up to the end of the double-blind withdrawal period (week 44). Patients and any personnel interacting directly with patients or sites were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to disease flare during the double-blind withdrawal period and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of baricitinib throughout the three trial periods. For adverse events in the double-blind withdrawal period, exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03773978, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Dec 17, 2018 and March 3, 2021, 220 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of baricitinib (152 [69%] girls and 68 [31%] boys; median age 14·0 years [IQR 12·0-16·0]). 219 patients received baricitinib in the open-label lead-in period, of whom 163 (74%) had at least a JIA-ACR30 response at week 12 and were randomly assigned to placebo (n=81) or baricitinib (n=82) in the double-blind withdrawal period. Time to disease flare was significantly shorter with placebo versus baricitinib (hazard ratio 0·241 [95% CI 0·128-0·453], p<0·0001). Median time to flare was 27·14 weeks (95% CI 15·29-not estimable) in the placebo group, and not evaluable for patients in the baricitinib group (<50% had a flare event). Six (3%) of 220 patients had serious adverse events during the safety and pharmacokinetic period or open-label lead-in period. In the double-blind withdrawal period, serious adverse events were reported in four (5%) of 82 patients (incidence rate [IR] 9·7 [95% CI 2·7-24·9] per 100 patient-years at risk) in the baricitinib group and three (4%) of 81 (IR 10·2 [2·1-29·7]) in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent infections were reported during the safety and pharmacokinetic or open-label lead-in period in 55 (25%) of 220 patients, and during the double-blind withdrawal period in 31 (38%) of 82 (IR 102·1 [95% CI 69·3-144·9]) in the baricitinib group and 15 (19%) of 81 (IR 59·0 [33·0-97·3]) in the placebo group. Pulmonary embolism was reported as a serious adverse event in one patient (1%; IR 2·4 [95% CI 0·1-13·3]) in the baricitinib group in the double-blind withdrawal period, which was judged to be related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: Baricitinib was efficacious with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and juvenile psoriatic arthritis, after inadequate response or intolerance to standard therapy. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company under licence from Incyte.