Obstetrical parameters influencing the duration of the second stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of parameters influencing the duration of the second stage of labor in vaginal deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: 1200 consecutive vaginal deliveries were analyzed. Descriptive statistics are reported for parity, duration of first and second stage of labor, maternal age, birth weight, position of the fetal head, epidural analgesia and oxytocin augmentation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the contribution of different variables to the length of the second stage of labor. RESULTS: The mean length of the second stage was 70 min. In univariate analysis, parity, oxytocin augmentation and epidural analgesia, as well as occipito-posterior presentation were significant parameters associated with a prolonged second stage of labor. No correlation was found for birth weight and maternal age. In multivariate regression analysis, nulliparity and epidural analgesia were the strongest risk factors for a prolonged second stage. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of epidural analgesia on the second stage of labor should be considered in obstetrical management.

[Progress in the early diagnosis of breast carcinoma during the years 1981-1990. Results of a longitudinal study]. / Fortschritte in der Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms in den Jahren 1981-1990. Ergebnisse einer Longitudinalstudie.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Current meta-analyses have left in doubt whether general breast screening increases survival rate. This study investigated whether efforts at early diagnosis of cancer in the 1980s have had an effect on average tumor size at first diagnosis and on survival rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1981 to 1990, 1656 consecutive patients (average age 56.6 years) at the I. Women's Clinic at the Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich and the Women's Clinic Berlin-Charlottenburg were operated on for primary breast cancer. In a retrospective analysis, average tumor size at the primary operation and survival rate were determined for two periods: 1981-1985 (n=849) and 1986-1990. Mean follow-up time was 63 months. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two cohorts regarding age (p = 0.77) and axillary node status (p = 0.14). During the follow-up period there was a gradual decrease in the tumor size at first diagnosis. (Pearson's correlation coefficient: -0.79, p < 0.001). Average tumor size in those operated on was 25 mm up to 1985, and 21 mm after 1986 (p < 0.001). Until 1985, the initial reason for mammography was the planned subsequent operation in 19% of patients (n = 164), and in 27% (n = 215; p < 0.001) since 1986. But there was no statistically significant rise in disease-specific survival rate (log rank, p=0.48). Multivariate analysis confirmed the conventional prognostic parameters, such as tumor size (relative risk 2.21) and axillary lymph node metastases (relative risk 3.57), but not the period of follow-up (p=0.90). CONCLUSION: During the stated periods of follow-up there was a significant decrease in average tumor size at initial diagnosis. But this did not result in any demonstrably better disease-specific survival rate.