Strategies to tackle racial inequalities in medical school.

The recent resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement has catalysed long overdue discussions around racial and ethnic discrimination, and systemic racism in institutions globally. One area where these discussions are crucial is within the medical field: staff and students from all backgrounds have been lobbying for change. Based on the approach of various faculties, this paper makes recommendations for establishing a race equality working group within a medical school. An evidence-based approach outlines the existing problems, potential solutions and practical advice on how to implement them.

A randomized controlled trial of laser-assisted ICSI.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the use of a laser to open the zona pellucida during ICSI (laser assisted or LA-ICSI) improve oocyte survival, embryo development and clinical outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Compared to conventional ICSI, LA-ICSI increased rates of oocyte survival and some aspects of embryo development but it did not alter the ongoing pregnancy rate; after adjusting for oocyte survival, there was no beneficial effect of LA-ICSI on embryo development and utilization. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oocyte degeneration occurs in a 10th of mature oocytes after ICSI. Pilot studies suggest that LA-ICSI may improve oocyte survivability. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In a randomized controlled trial, 966 couples (16 122 metaphase II oocytes) were allocated to receive LA-ICSI (intervention) or conventional ICSI (control) between 17 September 2018 and 5 August 2019. Oocyte survival (primary endpoint), embryo development and ongoing pregnancy rates were compared. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Couples included in this study were recommended for ICSI due to female or male factor, unexplained infertility or a combination of factors. Patients were ineligible to participate in the study if they had uterine abnormality including thin endometrium, recurrent pregnancy loss, endometriosis or a severe medical condition. Concealed randomization to LA-ICSI or conventional ICSI, allocated in a 1:1 ratio, took place on stimulation Day 1 with replacement of blastocysts on only Day 5. The primary endpoint was oocyte survival with membrane integrity 24 h after the ICSI procedure. The sample size was estimated to detect a 3% increase in oocyte survival after LA-ICSI with 99% power at a 1% significance level. This also permitted the detection of 10% increase in ongoing pregnancy rate after LA-ICSI with 85% power at 5% alpha level. We used Poisson regression with zero-inflation for count data to estimate relative risk (RR) with 95% CI and logistic regression for clinical outcomes to estimate odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. Both models adjusted for age as a covariate. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Compared with conventional ICSI, LA-ICSI resulted in a higher number of surviving oocytes (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.12, P < 0.001), as well as a higher number of fertilized oocytes (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.13, P < 0.001) and utilizable blastocysts (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses adjusted for oocyte survival showed no between-group difference in utilizable blastocysts (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95-1.08, P = 0.73) and by calculating the mean rate, a reduction in utilizable blastocysts was shown (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97, P < 0.001). Ongoing pregnancy showed no between-group difference (LA-ICSI 179/489 (37%) vs ICSI 201/477 (42%), OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.03, P = 0.09). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: It was not possible to blind the embryologists involved in the ICSI procedure. However, there was concealment of randomization and blinding of outcome assessments reducing the risk of selection and measurement bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A beneficial effect of LA-ICSI on oocyte survival should be shown to improve clinical outcomes, before its use in clinical practice is justified. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study received no funding, and the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03665103. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 11 September 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 17 September 2018.

Practical aspects on the use of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants.

Preterm infants frequently present with respiratory insufficiency requiring respiratory assistance. Invasive mechanical ventilation has been associated with several short and long term complications. Therefore, the practice of early use of non-invasive ventilation has been adopted. Nasal CPAP proved efficacy as an initial therapy for preterm infants. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is an alternative used to mitigate CPAP failure in infants with apnea or increased work of breathing. High flow nasal cannula gained popularity primarily due to the ease of its use, despite multiple prominent trials that demonstrated its inferiority. Bi-level positive airway pressure and neurally adjusted non-invasive ventilatory are used in infants with apnea and increased work of breathing. The effectiveness of non invasive ventilation tools can be augmented by having a proper protocol for initiation, weaning, skin care, positioning, and developmental care during their application.