RESUMEN
Aim: To determine the rate, repartition and risk factors of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the pathological and clinical data of 184 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer at a tertiary care center in Beirut, Lebanon. Results: 88% of patients received a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. 70% of patients presented LN metastases at both pelvic and para-aortic levels, while isolated pelvic or para-aortic LN metastases were seen in 16 and 14% of cases, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the rate of positive LNs was higher in patients with serous histology (65 vs 33%; p < 0.001), high-grade tumors (68 vs 26%; p < 0.001), bilateral adnexal involvement (74 vs 27%; p < 0.001), advanced clinical stage (p < 0.001), interval debulking surgery (63.2 vs 36.8%; p = 0.003) and positive peritoneal cytology (79 vs 26%; p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the rate of LN involvement was significantly higher in patients with higher grade, advanced clinical stage and positive peritoneal cytology. Conclusion: Serous histology, grade 3 tumors, positive peritoneal cytology, advanced clinical stage, interval surgery and bilateral adnexal involvement can predict LN metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Líbano/epidemiología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Centros de Atención TerciariaAsunto(s)
Desastres , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Neoplasias/terapia , Humanos , Líbano , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Socorro/organización & administración , Organización Mundial de la Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus on the administration of anti-neoplastic agents to patients on peritoneal dialysis. Dose adjustments to prevent serious adverse events are still not established. Thus, the aim of this study was to systematically review current evidence on the use of systemic oncology therapies in peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. All relevant data was collected, including clinical and pharmacokinetic parameters, with comparison to subjects with normal renal function. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. All were case reports. Eighteen types of anti-cancer drugs were reviewed. Multiple adverse events and altered pharmacokinetics were reported. CONCLUSION: Data concerning the use of anti-neoplastic drugs in patients on peritoneal dialysis are still sparse. The elimination of anti-cancer agents seems often altered in such patients, resulting in serious adverse events. Based on the available evidence, we suggest the need for dose adjustment of each drug.