Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 1201, 2019 03 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30867415

RESUMEN

Evaluating odor blends in sensory processing is a crucial step for signal recognition and execution of behavioral decisions. Using behavioral assays and 2-photon imaging, we have characterized the neural and behavioral correlates of mixture perception in the olfactory system of Drosophila. Mixtures of odors with opposing valences elicit strong inhibition in certain attractant-responsive input channels. This inhibition correlates with reduced behavioral attraction. We demonstrate that defined subsets of GABAergic interneurons provide the neuronal substrate of this computation at pre- and postsynaptic loci via GABAB- and GABAA receptors, respectively. Intriguingly, manipulation of single input channels by silencing and optogenetic activation unveils a glomerulus-specific crosstalk between the attractant- and repellent-responsive circuits. This inhibitory interaction biases the behavioral output. Such a form of selective lateral inhibition represents a crucial neuronal mechanism in the processing of conflicting sensory information.


Asunto(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/fisiología , Odorantes , Bulbo Olfatorio/fisiología , Vías Olfatorias/fisiología , Percepción Olfatoria/fisiología , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Antenas de Artrópodos/inervación , Conducta Animal/fisiología , Potenciales Postsinápticos Excitadores/fisiología , Femenino , Neuronas GABAérgicas/fisiología , Potenciales Postsinápticos Inhibidores/fisiología , Interneuronas/fisiología , Neuronas Receptoras Olfatorias/fisiología , Optogenética , Receptores Odorantes/genética , Receptores Odorantes/fisiología
2.
Cell Rep ; 23(8): 2524-2531, 2018 05 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29791860

RESUMEN

Despite the comprehensive knowledge on odor coding, our understanding of the relationship between sensory input and behavioral output in Drosophila remains weak. Here, we measure the behavioral responses generated by larval and adult flies in response to 34 fruit odors and find that larval preference for fruit odors differs from that of adult flies. Next, we provide a functional analysis of the full repertoire of the peripheral olfactory system using the same comprehensive stimulus spectrum. We find that 90% and 53% of larval and adult olfactory receptors tested here, respectively, are involved in evaluating these fruit odors. Finally, we find that the total amount of olfactory neuronal activity correlates strongly positively with behavioral output in larvae and correlates weakly negatively in adult flies. Our results suggest that larval and adult flies have evolved different mechanisms for detection and computation of fruit odors, mechanisms likely mirroring the different lifestyles of both developmental stages.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Conducta de Elección , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiología , Frutas , Odorantes , Olfato/fisiología , Animales , Conducta Animal , Larva/fisiología , Receptores Odorantes/metabolismo , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/análisis
3.
Nat Commun ; 8(1): 265, 2017 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28814724

RESUMEN

Pathogens and parasites can manipulate their hosts to optimize their own fitness. For instance, bacterial pathogens have been shown to affect their host plants' volatile and non-volatile metabolites, which results in increased attraction of insect vectors to the plant, and, hence, to increased pathogen dispersal. Behavioral manipulation by parasites has also been shown for mice, snails and zebrafish as well as for insects. Here we show that infection by pathogenic bacteria alters the social communication system of Drosophila melanogaster. More specifically, infected flies and their frass emit dramatically increased amounts of fly odors, including the aggregation pheromones methyl laurate, methyl myristate, and methyl palmitate, attracting healthy flies, which in turn become infected and further enhance pathogen dispersal. Thus, olfactory cues for attraction and aggregation are vulnerable to pathogenic manipulation, and we show that the alteration of social pheromones can be beneficial to the microbe while detrimental to the insect host.Behavioral manipulation of host by pathogens has been observed in vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants. Here the authors show that in Drosophila, infection with pathogenic bacteria leads to increased pheromone release, which attracts healthy flies. This process benefits the pathogen since it enhances bacterial dispersal, but is detrimental to the host.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación Animal , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/fisiopatología , Odorantes , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Serratia/fisiopatología , Olfato , Conducta Social , Acinetobacter , Animales , Señales (Psicología) , Drosophila melanogaster , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Lactobacillus plantarum , Pectobacterium carotovorum , Pseudomonas , Serratia marcescens
4.
J Exp Biol ; 220(Pt 10): 1812-1819, 2017 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28235908

RESUMEN

The genetic toolbox in Drosophila melanogaster offers a multitude of different effector constructs to silence neurons and neuron populations. In this study, we investigated the potencies of several effector genes - when expressed in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) - to abolish odor-guided behavior in three different bioassays. We found that two of the tested effectors (tetanus toxin and Kir2.1) are capable of mimicking the Orco mutant phenotype in all of our behavioral paradigms. In both cases, the effectiveness depended on effector expression levels, as full suppression of odor-guided behavior was observed only in flies homozygous for both Gal4-driver and UAS-effector constructs. Interestingly, the impact of the effector genes differed between chemotactic assays (i.e. the fly has to follow an odor gradient to localize the odor source) and anemotactic assays (i.e. the fly has to walk upwind after detecting an attractive odorant). In conclusion, our results underline the importance of performing appropriate control experiments when exploiting the D. melanogaster genetic toolbox, and demonstrate that some odor-guided behaviors are more resistant to genetic perturbations than others.


Asunto(s)
Quimiotaxis/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Olfato/genética , Animales , Conducta Animal , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiología , Vuelo Animal , Genes de Insecto/genética , Odorantes , Neuronas Receptoras Olfatorias/fisiología , Caminata
5.
J Chem Ecol ; 42(8): 739-747, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27539589

RESUMEN

Adult Drosophila melanogaster locate food resources by using distinct olfactory cues that often are associated with the fermentation of fruit. However, in addition to being an odorous food source and providing a possible site for oviposition, fermenting fruit also provides a physical substrate upon which flies can attract and court a potential mate. In this study, we demonstrate that Drosophila adults are able to recruit additional flies to a food source by covering the exposed surface area with fecal spots, and that this recruitment is mediated via olfactory receptors (Ors). Analyses of the deposited frass material demonstrates that frass contains several previously studied pheromone components, such as methyl laurate (ML), methyl myristate (MM), methyl palmitate (MP), and 11-cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA), in addition to several cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) that are known to be behaviorally active. Moreover, this study also demonstrates that adult feeding is increased in the presence of frass, although it appears that Ors are less likely to mediate this phenomenon. In summary, the frass deposited by the fly onto the fruit provides both pheromone and CHC cues that lead to increased feeding and aggregation in Drosophila. This research is the first step in examining Drosophila frass as an important chemical signature that provides information about both the sex and the species of the fly that generated the fecal spots.


Asunto(s)
Agresión/efectos de los fármacos , Drosophila melanogaster/efectos de los fármacos , Conducta Alimentaria/efectos de los fármacos , Feromonas/farmacología , Animales , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiología , Heces/química , Femenino , Frutas , Masculino , Caracteres Sexuales , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA