RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Anxiety is a mental state characterized by an intense sense of tension, worry, or apprehension relative to something adverse that might happen in the future. Anxiety is a known comorbidity in cough patients, yet its prevalence among those with chronic refractory cough (CRC) is unknown. Anxiety is not typically assessed during evaluation for CRC, but treatments for CRC such as neuromodulators and behavioral cough suppression therapy (BCST) may potentially attenuate anxiety. This preliminary study investigates the potential prevalence of anxiety in CRC and its possible role in treatment outcomes. METHOD: CRC patients seen in a specialty clinic at the University of Utah or the University of Montana completed the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) pre- and post-BCST treatment. Participants were dichotomized into positive anxiety screen (PAS) and negative anxiety screen (NAS) groups based on presence or absence of documented anxiety within electronic medical records at the University of Utah and based on a Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score > 5 at the University of Montana. RESULTS: Of the 86 total participants, 37 (43%) were in the PAS group (29 females, Mage = 56 ± 13) and 49 (57%) were in the NAS group (36 females, Mage = 64 ± 14). Eighty-nine percent of CRC participants with a PAS reported a clinically meaningful improvement in LCQ total score following treatment compared to 65% of NAS participants. Furthermore, mean pre- to posttreatment change scores on the LCQ were significantly greater within the PAS group (p = .002, Cohen's d = 0.7, indicating a moderate to large effect size). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that (a) anxiety may be prevalent among those with CRC and (b) those patients who screen positive for anxiety report greater benefit from BCST.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Tos , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Prevalencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tos/diagnóstico , Tos/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to collect pilot efficacy data on a novel treatment for refractory chronic cough (RCC), which we call cough desensitization treatment (CDT). DESIGN AND METHODS: In this parallel cohort, sham-controlled, randomized controlled trial, 21 adults with RCC were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of either CDT (progressive doses of aerosolized capsaicin while behaviorally suppressing cough; n = 11) or a sham treatment (repeated exposure to aerosolized saline; n = 9). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was the primary outcome measure. Perceived cough severity with a visual analogue scale and cough challenge testing (for measuring cough-reflex sensitivity) were secondary outcome measures. Data were analyzed with mixed effects linear regression and follow-up contrasts. RESULTS: Results on all measures favored CDT. Excluding one sham participant, whose baseline LCQ scores were deemed unreliable, mean change in LCQ at 3-weeks post treatment was 6.35 and 2.17 in the CDT and sham groups, respectively. There was moderate to strong evidence of a greater improvement in the CDT group in total LCQ score (p = .058) and LCQ Psychological domain (p = .026) and Physical domain (p = .045) scores. Strong evidence was found for a greater reduction in urge-to-cough during CCT in the CDT group (p = .037) and marginal for a reduction in the capsaicin cough-reflex sensitivity (p = .094). There was weak evidence of a greater reduction in cough severity in the CDT group (p = .103). DISCUSSION: Although the study is limited due to the small sample size, the data provide additional evidence supporting further research on CDT. CDT resulted in a greater change in the primary efficacy measure (LCQ) than both pharmaceutical and behavioral treatments currently found in the literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial (NCT05226299) was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on 07/02/2022.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Capsaicina , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The primary self-assessment questionnaire used for patients with chronic cough is the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). The LCQ is a validated questionnaire that ranges in total score from 3 to 21. While it is known that a higher score on the LCQ reflects a better quality of life, normative data have not been reported for this questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine normative LCQ scores on a healthy population without cough. METHODS: The LCQ was distributed via electronic survey to the authors' universities, professional affiliation email lists, and personal contacts. Participants were included if they were at least 18, nonsmokers, and without abnormal cough, without pulmonary disease, and without neurological disease. Participants answered questions regarding age, gender, and race/ethnicity, and completed the 19 LCQ questions. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three (118 women) LCQ responses were analyzed. Average participant age was 47 years (SD = 13) and 133 (93%) were Caucasian. The mean LCQ Total score was 20.23 (SD = 0.85) with scores ranging from 17.05 to 21. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined the following LCQ scores should be considered normal threshold scores: Total score - 17.68, Physical domain - 5.36, Psychological domain - 5.81, and Social domain - 6.06. The findings of this study will assist clinicians in determining severity of cough impact on quality of life using the LCQ. Further research is needed to ensure more complete participant demographic representation.
Asunto(s)
Tos , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tos/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Crónica , Estado de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Behavioral cough suppression therapy (BCST) has demonstrated up to 88% effectiveness at treating refractory chronic cough (RCC). With onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with many other medical services, BCST shifted to telehealth delivery. Our group hypothesized that BCST delivered via telemedicine by a specialized Speech-Language Pathologist would be comparable to previously reported response to treatment for in-person settings. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: An Emory IRB approved, retrospective review of electronic medical records was completed for RCC patients who received BCST via telehealth from March 2020 through January 2022 at Emory Voice Center. Patients were included in the study if they had a diagnosis of RCC, were referred for BCST, were seen for at least one therapy session in the telehealth setting, and provided Cough Severity Index (CSI) data pre and post-treatment. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete datasets, a known pulmonary condition, structural laryngeal disorders, smoking history, dysphagia, and ACE-inhibitor use. Change in CSI score pre- and post-treatment was calculated to determine treatment effect. Paired-samples t-tests were conducted to compare pre-and post-treatment CSI score change. RESULTS: Fifty-one RCC patients were included in this study; 88% were female with an average age of 60 years (SD = 12.68). Post-treatment CSI scores were significantly lower than pretreatment CSI scores (P < 0.0001). These findings are comparable to historical documented CSI change achieved with in-person BCST. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence of the efficacy of BCST via telehealth for treating RCC. The findings of this study support the continued flexibility in speech-language pathology service delivery to include in-person and telehealth platforms for RCC beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine feasibility of treating refractory chronic cough (RCC) with progressive doses of capsaicin paired with cough suppression. METHODS: In this sham-controlled, parallel RCT, 14 adults with RCC were randomly assigned to either behavioral cough suppression therapy (BCST) plus 6 treatment sessions involving exposure to nebulized capsaicin in progressively larger concentrations while actively suppressing cough (n = 8), or BCST plus 6 sessions of exposure to a single subthreshold dose of capsaicin (sham; n = 6). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was the primary outcome measure. Urge-to-cough (UTC) testing, measuring both UTC and cough frequency, served as secondary outcome measures. Data was analyzed with mixed effects linear regression and follow-up contrasts. RESULTS: Results on all measures favored the treatment group; however, there was only strong evidence of a difference in treatment effect on cough frequency during UTC testing. Mean change in LCQ at 3-weeks post treatment was 2.95 and 1.75 (p = .23), in the treatment and sham groups, respectively. Cough frequency during UTC testing reduced by 97% and 56% (p < .0001) at three weeks post, respectively. Within-group comparisons revealed strong evidence of change in the treatment group (p < .001) and moderate evidence of a change in the sham group (p = .08) in LCQ. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions from this study are limited due to the very small sample size; however, the study provides feasibility and proof-of-concept evidence to support further investigation of treating RCC with repeated exposure to nebulized capsaicin paired with BCST.
Asunto(s)
Tos , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the typical symptoms and medical management characteristics of adult patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC) who are referred to speech-language pathology (SLP) for behavioral cough suppression therapy (BCST) in order to estimate cost-effectiveness and efficiency of current practice patterns for this population. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four (164) patients with RCC referred for BCST were surveyed. Patients completed an initial survey at BCST onset related to symptom pattern and prior treatment, including the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Every four to six weeks patients completed follow-up surveys to assess their response to BCST. RESULTS: Mean age was 58 years (83.5% women). The majority of patients reported their cough began two or more years prior to BCST. Approximately half (49%) reported seeing four or more physicians (including primary care physicians) and being prescribed four or more medications (57%) prior to BCST. Medications targeting post-nasal drip (72%), reflux (70%), asthma (56%), and allergies (56%) were most commonly prescribed. BCST resulted in a clinically significant improvement in 70.1% of participants. The mean change in LCQ for those who improved with BCST was 6.61. Over half (58%) reported they were quite satisfied to completely satisfied with their treatment response. The average time from enrollment to study completion was 64 days. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest early intervention with BCST may be a cost-effective and efficient option for patients with RCC.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Costo de Enfermedad , Tos/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In his article 'Admission avoidable' (Nursing Older People November) Jon Glasby writes: 'Many older people may be admitted to hospital as a result of social isolation there is scope to develop befriending services, day care and community alarm services. Particularly important are home carers who provide companionship as well as personal care'.
RESUMEN
Further to Hazel Heath's article 'Relative priorities' (NOP October), when some years ago my father, an active 84-year-old, was admitted to hospital, I visited him every other afternoon. We got into the habit of him having a bath before tea. Few people wanted one in the afternoon so Father could enjoy a long soak. I would run the bath and scrub his back as I had done at home.
RESUMEN
Has anyone done any research or written a paper on the first month or so following admission to a nursing home or unit for elderly mentally infirm people?