Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 5(9): 2392-8, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10499609

RESUMEN

This Phase II trial was undertaken to determine the safety, toxicity, and potential efficacy of the B-cell restricted immunotoxin anti-B4-blocked ricin (Anti-B4-bR) when administered as adjuvant therapy to patients in complete remission (CR) after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Forty-nine patients with B-cell NHL in CR 46-202 days (median, 112 days) post-ABMT received Anti-B4-bR at a dose of 30 microg/kg lean body weight/day for 7 days by continuous i.v. infusion. Patients were eligible for up to two additional courses of therapy at 14-day intervals. A total of 83 courses of Anti-B4-bR were administered, with 31 patients receiving two or more courses of therapy. The mean serum level on day 7 of the first course was 0.77+/-0.41 nM. Reversible toxicities included hepatic transaminase elevations, thrombocytopenia, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, hypoalbuminemia, and dyspnea. Human antimouse antibody (HAMA) and/or human antiricin antibody (HARA) responses occurred in 23 patients at a median of 22 days from the initiation of Anti-B4-bR therapy (range, 11-100 days). The 4-year disease-free survival and overall survival are estimated at 56 and 72%, respectively. Twenty-six patients remain in CR after a median follow-up of 54.5 months. This study demonstrates that Anti-B4-bR can be administered safely to patients as adjuvant therapy early after ABMT for B-cell NHL. The toxicities are tolerable and reversible. Although the early estimate of disease-free survival was very encouraging in this single-armed trial, the 4-year follow-up data demonstrate continued relapse.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Inmunotoxinas/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Ricina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Heterófilos/sangre , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunotoxinas/inmunología , Infusiones Intravenosas , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Ricina/efectos adversos , Ricina/inmunología
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 95(22): 13141-6, 1998 Oct 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9789055

RESUMEN

We conducted a Phase I clinical trial investigating the biologic activity of vaccination with irradiated autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic melanoma. Immunization sites were intensely infiltrated with T lymphocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, and eosinophils in all 21 evaluable patients. Although metastatic lesions resected before vaccination were minimally infiltrated with cells of the immune system in all patients, metastatic lesions resected after vaccination were densely infiltrated with T lymphocytes and plasma cells and showed extensive tumor destruction (at least 80%), fibrosis, and edema in 11 of 16 patients examined. Antimelanoma cytotoxic T cell and antibody responses were associated with tumor destruction. These results demonstrate that vaccination with irradiated autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent antitumor immunity in humans with metastatic melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/genética , Linfocitos/inmunología , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/terapia , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Citocinas/biosíntesis , Citocinas/sangre , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/patología , Eosinófilos/inmunología , Eosinófilos/patología , Ingeniería Genética , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/biosíntesis , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/patología , Macrófagos/inmunología , Macrófagos/patología , Melanoma/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/patología , Trasplante Autólogo
3.
Blood ; 90(12): 4996-5001, 1997 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9389719

RESUMEN

Hematopoietic growth factors allow dose escalation of chemotherapy. This approach may potentially reduce the quality and quantity of hematopoietic stem cells. The capacity of stem cells recovered after dose intensification to support myeloablative therapy is unknown. In patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma, trilineage hematopoietic engraftment was compared in two sequential trials of induction therapy (standard dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [CHOP] without growth factors or dose intensification CHOP supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF ]) followed by identical myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell support. Neutrophil, platelet, and red blood cell (RBC) engraftment were compared on days 100, 180, and 360 after stem cell reinfusion. Despite similar patient characteristics including reinfusion of comparable numbers of marrow mononuclear cells, after stem cell transplantation, a highly significant prolongation of neutrophil and platelet engraftment was seen in patients who received high dose CHOP and G-CSF in comparison to standard dose CHOP. These findings suggest that dose intensified chemotherapy and G-CSF recruited stem cells into a proliferative phase and that G-CSF allowed retreatment at a time when stem cells were susceptible to damage by cytotoxic therapy. Such inadequate hematologic engraftment after myeloablative therapy might be avoided by either shortening the time that growth factor support is administered, lengthening the interval between cycles, or attempting to repetitively harvest additional stem cells either from the marrow or peripheral blood. Therefore, intensification of chemotherapy with growth factor support must be used with caution if stem cells are to be used to support myeloablative therapy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos de los fármacos , Linfoma Folicular/terapia , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma Folicular/sangre , Masculino , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Trasplante Autólogo , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA