Targeting chemical inputs and optimising HTS for agrochemical discovery.

In vivo high throughput screening (HTS) has been adopted by most of the larger crop protection companies as an important tool for the discovery of new agrochemicals. There has been a paradigm shift in capabilities from screening a few thousand compounds a year to several hundred thousand and the quantity of screening sample required has fallen dramatically. The unifying goal now bringing together screens and inputs is the need to maximise the flow of useful information from HTS and thereby minimise the time taken to discover robust leads and new products. This review examines the positive changes that have occurred towards targeted design and selection of chemical inputs for agrochemical discovery over the last ten years and corresponding developments in HTS assays, data analysis and the logistics of compound storage and dispensing.

Composition of chemical attractants affects trap catches of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, and other blowflies.

Numbers of Lucilia cuprina (Australian sheep blowfly), Chrysomya spp., and Calliphora spp. blowflies caught on sticky traps baited with various synthetic attractants or a standard liver/sodium sulfide attractant in western Queensland were recorded. Numbers of each genus collected were influenced by the composition of the chemical attractants. Attractant mixtures based on 2-mercaptoethanol, indole, butanoic/pentanoic acid, and a sodium sulfide solution gave 5- to 20-fold higher L. cuprina catches than the liver standard. These blends attracted similar numbers of Chrysomya spp. (0.85-2.7x) and fewer Calliphora spp. (0.02-0.2x) compared to the liver standard. These synthetic attractants were more effective and selective for L. cuprina than the standard liver/sodium sulfide attractant, and they can be packaged in controlled-release dispensers to generate constant, prolonged release of the attractant.