[Subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization]. / Injections sous-conjonctivales de bévacizumab dans le traitement de la néovascularisation cornéenne.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of subconjunctival bevacizumab in corneal neovascularization treatment. METHODS: The study was a prospective case series that included patients treated with subconjunctival bevacizumab injections for corneal neovascularization over a period of four months. A dose of 2.5 mg (0.1 mL) of bevacizumab (25 mg/mL) was injected into the subconjunctival area 1-2mm behind the limbus near the corneal neovascularization. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, corneal neovascularization, as well as local and general side effects. RESULTS: Thirteen eyes of 12 patients were included. The mean patient age was 44.2 years (range, 18-87 years). Patients received from two to four bevacizumab injections. The mean corneal neovascularization area decreased from 41.1 to 33.7 % at day 45 (p=0.0003) and to 33.9 % at day 120 (p=0.0013). Median visual acuity changed from 1.32 to 1.28 LogMAR on day 45 and to 1.25 LogMAR on day 120. Subconjunctival bevacizumab was well tolerated without general side effects. There was no significant change in intraocular pressure. An epithelial defect was described in three patients after initiation of bevacizumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Subconjunctival bevacizumab injections were effective and safe in reducing corneal neovascularization within the first four months. Meanwhile, improving vision may provide additional strategies.

[Identification of viable myocardium in ischemic heart disease with severe left ventricular contractile dysfunction: comparison of myocardial scintigraphy with 99mTc-sestamabi and with 201-thallium]. / Identification du myocarde viable dans les cardiopathies ischémiques avec atteinte sévère de la fonction contractile du ventricule gauche: comparaison de la scintigraphie myocardique <> au 99mtechnétium-sestamibi et de la scintigraphie myocardique au 201thallium.

The aim of this study was to compare quantitatively uptake of 99mTc-Sestamibi at rest and that of late redistribution of 201Tl in the same patients with severe ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction, and to correlate the uptake of the tracer to regional ventricular dysfunction studied by ECG grated 99Tc-Sestamini. A double isotope myocardial scintigraphy, 201 Thallium at rest/redistribution and 99Tc-Sestamibi at rest and on exercise, was performed in 28 patients with severe postinfarction ischaemic cardiomyopathy (EF= 29 +/- 4%). Quantitative analysis for each patient and each isotope were performed with respect to the number of hits expressed in percentage of the activity of a normal zone in 17 circumferential profiles distributed in 4 zones, that is to say in 476 segments. A score allowed counting of viable and non-viable segments and evaluation of contractile function of the 17 segments with respect to wall motion and systolic thickening. Total concordance of global uptake of the two isotopes was observed in 430 of the 476 segments (90.3%) (r= 0.814, p< 0.0001), but the 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake was less than 201 Th (71 +/- 23% vs 73 +/- 21%, p= 0.0001). With respect to left ventricular wall motion, uptake of 99mTc-Sestamibi was greater than that of 201Tl in normal or hypokinetic segments but less in akinetic and dyskinetic segments. The difference between the two isotopes was most marked in segments with very severe contractile dysfunction. The authors conclude that the uptake of 99mTc-Sestamibi is correlated with that of late distribution of 201Tl when left ventricular contraction is not too poor and should no longer be considered as only a marker of perfusion but can also be useful in the investigation of myocardial viability.

[Prognosis scores to help revascularization for ischemic heart failure]. / Scores pronostiques pour la revascularisation des myocardiopathies ischémiques.

AIMS: Patients suffering from coronary heart disease with ventricular systolic dysfunction present a bad prognosis and should be potentially revascularized. Up to now, surgery appeared to be the most feasible revascularization technique for such patients. Aims of this study were to assess the influence of different treatments (surgery, angioplasty or exclusively medical treatment) on clinical outcome and to establish a prognostic score practitioners to select the most appropriate therapy adapted to their patient profiles. METHOD: From 1995 to 2000, 492 patients were included in this cohort: 365 in the angioplasty group, 96 in the surgical group and 31 in the medical group. Kaplan Meier curves were made with a multivariate analysis to determine the significant predictive factors of mortality and major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 32 +/- 19 months, there was no statistical difference in mortality rate between the groups. However, the survival rate without MACE is higher in the surgical group, intermediate in the angioplasty group and lower in the medical group. Using the significant predictive factors of MACE in multivariate analysis, a prognostic score has been established in order to discriminate three categories of severity. For each category, angioplasty was compared with surgery in terms of the event-free-survival rate. For the two extreme categories (severe and non-severe), both treatments were equal. For the intermediate category, surgery obtained greater results. CONCLUSION: This prognostic score could help physicians in choosing the appropriate revascularization technique to treat patients with severe ischemic heart failure.