RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effective inhibition of plasma kallikrein may have significant benefits for patients with hereditary angioedema due to deficiency of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH-HAE) by reducing the frequency of angioedema attacks. Avoralstat is a small molecule inhibitor of plasma kallikrein. This study (OPuS-2) evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic avoralstat 300 or 500 mg compared with placebo. METHODS: OPuS-2 was a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Subjects were administered avoralstat 300 mg, avoralstat 500 mg, or placebo orally 3 times per day for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the angioedema attack rate based on adjudicator-confirmed attacks. RESULTS: A total of 110 subjects were randomized and dosed. The least squares (LS) mean attack rates per week were 0.589, 0.675, and 0.593 for subjects receiving avoralstat 500 mg, avoralstat 300 mg, and placebo, respectively. Overall, 1 subject in each of the avoralstat groups and no subjects in the placebo group were attack-free during the 84-day treatment period. The LS mean duration of all confirmed attacks was 25.4, 29.4, and 31.4 hours for the avoralstat 500 mg, avoralstat 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Using the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), improved QoL was observed for the avoralstat 500 mg group compared with placebo. Avoralstat was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not demonstrate efficacy of avoralstat in preventing angioedema attacks in C1-INH-HAE, it provided evidence of shortened angioedema episodes and improved QoL in the avoralstat 500 mg treatment group compared with placebo.
Asunto(s)
Angioedemas Hereditarios/prevención & control , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Calicreína Plasmática/antagonistas & inhibidores , Administración Oral , Adulto , Angioedemas Hereditarios/diagnóstico , Angioedemas Hereditarios/tratamiento farmacológico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Angioedema is defined as localized and self-limiting edema of the subcutaneous and submucosal tissue, due to a temporary increase in vascular permeability caused by the release of vasoactive mediator(s). When angioedema recurs without significant wheals, the patient should be diagnosed to have angioedema as a distinct disease. In the absence of accepted classification, different types of angioedema are not uniquely identified. For this reason, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology gave its patronage to a consensus conference aimed at classifying angioedema. Four types of acquired and three types of hereditary angioedema were identified as separate forms from the analysis of the literature and were presented in detail at the meeting. Here, we summarize the analysis of the data and the resulting classification of angioedema.
Asunto(s)
Angioedema/diagnóstico , Angioedema/tratamiento farmacológico , Angioedema/etiología , HumanosRESUMEN
Three power toothbrushes with different mechanical principles (blend-a-dent master-vertical oscillating system, blend-a-dent medic electric elliptical oscillating system, interplak-contra-rotationsystem of the bristle-tuft) and a conventional hand toothbrush were investigated in 60 oral hygiene-motivated persons in a three-month-study. Efficiency was tested by two parameters (plaque index, papillary-bleeding index) under statistically identical conditions. The study showed no major differences in efficiency between the power toothbrushes and the manual toothbrush. --For the whole study the power toothbrush with an elliptical oscillating system showed the best results. --Power toothbrushes are not more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush. The great statistical variation of the investigated parameters in each group shows that an optimal brushing technique was more important than the choice of a certain toothbrush. --The investigation of the interproximal areas showed that a toothbrush alone is not effective enough. The additional use of dental floss and/or interdental cleaners for optimal oral hygiene is essential.