Effectiveness of marine protected areas in safeguarding important migratory megafauna habitat.

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a commonly used management tool to safeguard marine life from anthropogenic impacts, yet their efficacy often remains untested. Evaluating how highly dynamic marine species use static MPAs is challenging but becoming more feasible with the advancement of telemetry data. Here, we focus on southern right whales (Eubalaena australis, SRWs) in the waters off Aotearoa/New Zealand, which declined from 30,000 whales to fewer than 40 mature females due to whaling. Now numbering in the low thousands, the key socializing and nursery areas for this population in the remote subantarctic islands are under the protection of different types of MPAs. However, the effectiveness of these MPAs in encompassing important whale habitat and protecting the whales from vessel traffic has not been investigated. To address this, we analyzed telemetry data from 29 SRWs tagged at the Auckland Islands between 2009 and 2022. We identified two previously unknown and currently unprotected areas that were used by the whales for important behaviors such as foraging, socializing, or resting. Additionally, by combining whale locations and vessel tracking data (2020-2022) during peak breeding period (June to October), we found high spatiotemporal overlap between whales and vessels within several MPAs, suggesting the whales could still be vulnerable to multiple anthropogenic stressors even when within areas designated for protection. Our results identify areas to be prioritized for future monitoring and investigation to support the ongoing recovery of this SRW population, as well as highlight the overarching importance of assessing MPA effectiveness post-implementation, especially in a changing climate.

Modeling the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of Dungeness crab fishing effort to inform whale entanglement risk mitigation on the U.S. West Coast.

Understanding and characterizing the spatiotemporal dynamics of fishing fleets is crucial for ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM). EBFM must not only account for the sustainability of target species catches, but also for the collateral impacts of fishing operations on habitats and non-target species. Increased rates of large whale entanglements in commercial Dungeness crab fishing gear have made reducing whale-fishery interactions a current and pressing challenge on the U.S. West Coast. While several habitat models exist for different large whale species along the West Coast, less is known about the crab fishery and the degree to which different factors influence the intensity and distribution of aggregate fishing effort. Here, we modeled the spatiotemporal patterns of Dungeness crab fishing effort in Oregon and Washington as a function of environmental, economic, temporal, social, and management related predictor variables using generalized linear mixed effects models. We then assessed the predictive performance of such models and discussed their usefulness in informing fishery management. Our models revealed low between-year variability and consistent spatial and temporal patterns in commercial Dungeness crab fishing effort. However, fishing effort was also responsive to multiple environmental, economic and management cues, which influenced the baseline effort distribution pattern. The best predictive model, chosen through out-of-sample cross-validation, showed moderate predictive performance and relied upon environmental, economic, and social covariates. Our results help fill the current knowledge gap around Dungeness crab fleet dynamics, and support growing calls to integrate fisheries behavioral data into fisheries management and marine spatial planning.

Selection of planning unit size in dynamic management strategies to reduce human-wildlife conflict.

Conservation planning traditionally relies upon static reserves; however, there is increasing emphasis on dynamic management (DM) strategies that are flexible in space and time. Due to its novelty, DM lacks best practices to guide design and implementation. We assessed the effect of planning unit size in a DM tool designed to reduce entanglement of protected whales in vertical ropes of surface buoys attached to crab traps in the lucrative U.S. Dungeness crab (Metacarcinus magister) fishery. We conducted a retrospective analysis from 2009 to 2019 with modeled distributions of blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae) whales and observed fisheries effort and revenue to evaluate the effect of 7 planning unit sizes on DM tool performance. We measured performance as avoided whale entanglement risk and protected fisheries revenue. Small planning units avoided up to $47 million of revenue loss and reduced entanglement risk by up to 25% compared to the large planning units currently in use by avoiding the incidental closure of areas with low biodiversity value and high fisheries revenue. However, large planning units were less affected by an unprecedented marine heat wave in 2014-2016 and by delays in information on the distributions of whales and the fishery. Our findings suggest that the choice of planning unit size will require decision-makers to navigate multiple socioecological considerations-rather than a one-size-fits-all approach-to separate wildlife from threats under a changing climate.

Selección del tamaño de la unidad de planeación en las estrategias dinámicas de manejo para reducir el conflicto humano-fauna Resumen La planeación de la conservación depende por tradición de las reservas estáticas; sin embargo, cada vez hay más énfasis en estrategias de manejo dinámico (MD) que son flexibles con el tiempo y el espacio. Ya que es novedoso, el MD carece de buenas prácticas que guíen el diseño y la implementación. Analizamos el efecto del tamaño de la unidad de planeación en una herramienta de MD diseñada para reducir el número de ballenas que se enredan en las cuerdas verticales de las boyas amarradas a las trampas para cangrejos de la pesquería lucrativa del cangrejo Dungeness (Metacarcinus magister) en los Estados Unidos. Realizamos un análisis retrospectivo de 2009 a 2019 con modelos de distribución de la ballena azul (Balaenoptera musculus) y la ballena jorobada (Megaptera novaeangliae) y observamos los esfuerzos y ganancias de la pesquería para evaluar el efecto del tamaño de siete unidades de planeación sobre el desempeño de una herramienta de MD. Medimos el desempeño como el riesgo de enredamiento evitado y los ingresos protegidos de la pesquería. Las unidades pequeñas de planeación evitaron hasta $47 millones de ingresos perdidos y redujeron el riesgo de enredamiento hasta en 25% en comparación con las unidades grandes que se usan actualmente al evitar el cierre indirecto de áreas con un valor bajo de biodiversidad e ingresos elevados para la pesquería. Sin embargo, las unidades grandes de planeación estuvieron menos afectadas por una ola de calor marino sin precedentes entre 2014 y 2016 y por los retrasos en la información sobre la distribución de las ballenas y la pesquería. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que la selección del tamaño de la unidad de planeación requerirá que el órgano decisorio navegue múltiples consideraciones socio-ecológicas-en lugar de un enfoque de un-tamaño-para-todos-para separar a la fauna de las amenazas bajo el clima cambiante.