Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus about whether the initial imaging method for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis should be computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography. METHODS: In this multicenter, pragmatic, comparative effectiveness trial, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 76 years of age who presented to the emergency department with suspected nephrolithiasis to undergo initial diagnostic ultrasonography performed by an emergency physician (point-of-care ultrasonography), ultrasonography performed by a radiologist (radiology ultrasonography), or abdominal CT. Subsequent management, including additional imaging, was at the discretion of the physician. We compared the three groups with respect to the 30-day incidence of high-risk diagnoses with complications that could be related to missed or delayed diagnosis and the 6-month cumulative radiation exposure. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, related serious adverse events (deemed attributable to study participation), pain (assessed on an 11-point visual-analogue scale, with higher scores indicating more severe pain), return emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 2759 patients underwent randomization: 908 to point-of-care ultrasonography, 893 to radiology ultrasonography, and 958 to CT. The incidence of high-risk diagnoses with complications in the first 30 days was low (0.4%) and did not vary according to imaging method. The mean 6-month cumulative radiation exposure was significantly lower in the ultrasonography groups than in the CT group (P<0.001). Serious adverse events occurred in 12.4% of the patients assigned to point-of-care ultrasonography, 10.8% of those assigned to radiology ultrasonography, and 11.2% of those assigned to CT (P=0.50). Related adverse events were infrequent (incidence, 0.4%) and similar across groups. By 7 days, the average pain score was 2.0 in each group (P=0.84). Return emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and diagnostic accuracy did not differ significantly among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Initial ultrasonography was associated with lower cumulative radiation exposure than initial CT, without significant differences in high-risk diagnoses with complications, serious adverse events, pain scores, return emergency department visits, or hospitalizations. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.).

Control of a community-wide outbreak of hepatitis A by mass vaccination with inactivated hepatitis A vaccine.

The epidemiology and control of hepatitis A virus was investigated during an outbreak of hepatitis A in a village in Israel. Postexposure administration of immune globulin to contacts was ineffective in controlling the outbreak. However, within 2 weeks of starting a mass immunization campaign with hepatitis A vaccine, the incidence of hepatitis A declined dramatically; the last case occurred 6 weeks after the immunization program began. The study demonstrated that while postexposure administration of immune globulin may diminish but not entirely arrest transmission of hepatitis A virus, active hepatitis A vaccination is a safe and effective intervention that can be used safely in hepatitis A virus antibody-positive children.

Evaluation of screening for hepatitis B surface antigen during pregnancy in a population with a high prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive/hepatitis B e antigen-negative carriers.

BACKGROUND: Universal hepatitis B vaccination in infancy was implemented in Israel in 1992. The program consists of active vaccination at birth and at 1 and 6 months of age, without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening during pregnancy. Infants of HBsAg carrier mothers do not receive specific hepatitis B immunoglobulin in addition to vaccine at birth. The recently arrived Jewish immigrants from Ethiopia are the group with the highest rate of HBsAg carriage (approximately 10%) in Israel. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the present policy is effective against perinatal HBV transmission from mothers of Ethiopian origin to their infants. METHODS: The study group included 411 Israeli born children, offspring of mothers of Ethiopian origin. All infants were fully vaccinated starting at birth. Sera were collected from the children at the age of 9 to 36 months and from their mothers. Tests for HBsAg, antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were performed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of the children had detectable anti-HBs, including 82.2% with protective anti-HBs concentrations (> or =10 mIU/ ml). Although 24 mothers (6.2%) were HBsAg carriers, none of the children was HBsAg-positive. Seven of 394 infants (1.7%) tested positive for anti-HBc. This test became negative in 5 of 6 who were followed for 12 months. The percentage of infants with protective anti-HBs concentrations decreased significantly from 91.4% at 9 to 12 months to 70.1% at 31 to 36 months of age. The mother's infection status was not associated with the infant's response to vaccine. Calculation based on the above data suggests that screening for HBsAg in pregnancy in that group is not cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the Israeli vaccination program against HBV infection is effective, even in a high risk population, and additional measures are not cost-effective.

Anamnestic response to hepatitis B vaccine in nonalcoholic liver cirrhosis patients with and without HBV-DNA.

Two methods were used to unveil a possible previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with postnecrotic liver cirrhosis. The anamnestic response to a booster injection of HB vaccine was assessed, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique for the detection of HBV-DNA in serum and liver tissue, using primers to span the precore and core regions, was employed. Seventeen patients with postnecrotic liver cirrhosis were selected from a population with a high prevalence of HBV infection and were compared with 11 liver cirrhosis patients who were positive for antibodies to surface antigen (anti-HBs) IgG antibodies. All patients were given one dose of HB vaccine into the deltoid muscle, and anti-HBs titers were measured 1 and 4 wk after injection. Three of 17 patients, initially negative for anti-HBs, showed a primary response, with titers of anti-HBs rising from 0 to a maximum of 85 mIU/ml after 4 wk; the rest had no response. Of the 11 patients positive for anti-HBs, of whom nine were also IgG anti-HBs positive, only four had an intense anamnestic response, with anti-HBs titers rising to more than 10 times the initial values (up to 10,800 mIU/ml). Serum HBV-DNA was detected in eight patients in the antibody-negative group and in only one patient in the antibody-positive group (p less than 0.02). None of the four patients with positive anamnestic response had HBV-DNA in the serum. The prevalence of HBV-DNA in the liver was similar in both groups. Absence of HBV-DNA in serum of most patients positive for anti-HBs supports the hypothesis that HBV particles released from the liver may be captured by antibodies in the serum. We conclude that assessment of the anamnestic response to HB vaccine has no diagnostic advantage, compared with direct measurement of conventional HBV serological markers in patients with liver cirrhosis. Moreover, we suggest that this type of immunologic response may not occur when virion-associated HBV-DNA is present in the serum.

Hepatitis B virus infection in patients with idiopathic liver disease.

We studied 67 HBsAg-negative Israeli patients (36 negative for all HBV serological markers as group 1 and 31 positive for antibodies to HBs and HBc as group 2) with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis of unknown origin using a rapid, sensitive and specific assay for the detection of low levels of hepatitis B virus in serum. This technique uses a high-affinity monoclonal antibody to HBs against an a domain epitope of HBsAg to capture the virion, followed by hepatitis B virus DNA amplification with the polymerase chain reaction. In addition, 55 subjects without liver disease served as controls: Group 3 (n = 32) was negative for all hepatitis B virus markers; group 4 (n = 23) was positive for antibodies to HBs and HBc. We found 11 individuals in group 1 (31%) and 10 in group 2 (29%) harboring low levels of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum. In contrast, no one in group 3 or group 4 was positive by this technique (p less than 0.0001). Using polymerase chain reaction primers spanning other regions of the hepatitis B virus genome and a method of restriction-fragment analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified sequences, we detected significant DNA sequence heterogeneity, suggesting infection with distinct hepatitis B virus strains. DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded liver biopsy specimens of 42 patients from groups 1 and 2 was shown to contain hepatitis B virus DNA by polymerase chain reaction in 11 of 12 patients with circulating virion DNA. More important, 18 additional patients whose sera were negative by HBs-antibody capture/polymerase chain reaction amplification had hepatitis B virus DNA sequences in their livers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A hepatitis B virus mutant associated with an epidemic of fulminant hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: A nosocomial outbreak of fulminant hepatitis B occurred in five patients in Haifa, Israel. Previous investigations identified the suspected source as a carrier of hepatitis B surface antigen who was positive for antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen and had chronic liver disease. We examined the strain of hepatitis B virus (HBV) that caused this epidemic, in order to identify specific mutations in the precore or core region. METHODS: The presence of HBV was identified by polymerase-chain-reaction amplification of viral DNA in serum from the source patient, the five patients with fulminant hepatitis B, and five controls with acute, self-limited hepatitis B. The amplified viral HBV DNA samples were then cloned and sequenced. RESULTS: Sequence analysis of viral DNA established that the same HBV mutant with two mutations in the precore region was present in the source patient and the five patients with fulminant hepatic failure. This HBV mutant had significant sequence divergence from other known HBV subtypes in the X, precore, and core regions. Cloned HBV DNA derived from a hospitalized patient who had subclinical hepatitis B at the same time as the outbreak and from four other control subjects with acute, self-limited hepatitis B all contained the wild-type sequence in the precore region. CONCLUSIONS: In the outbreak we studied, a mutant hepatitis B viral strain was transmitted from a common source to five patients who subsequently died of fulminant hepatitis B infection. Naturally occurring viral mutations hepatitis B infection. Naturally occurring viral mutations in the HBV genome may predispose the infected host to more severe liver injury.

Hepatitis B virus infection in Ethiopian immigrants to Israel.

Two groups of immigrants from Ethiopia, one of 86 and the other of 165 individuals, aged 0-40, were examined for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in 1987-88, 3-7 years after their arrival in Israel. The results were compared with those obtained in the same age-group among Ethiopians who immigrated to Israel in 1980-82. The immigrants were found to be in good physical condition, their liver function tests were normal and no clinical evidence of chronic liver disease was found. Of the 22 children aged 0-4, 16 had anti-HBs as a result of vaccination at birth against HBV and they were excluded from the comparative study. In the age-groups 5-40 there was no significant change in the percentage of individuals positive for HBsAg, anti-HBs or anti-HBc only, compared with the group examined in 1980-82. There were two significant findings in this study: a) In 1987-88 [corrected], 8-9% of HBsAg-positive individuals had HBeAg and 64-81% had anti-HBe, while in 1980-82, 36% of those positive for HBsAg had HBeAg and only 25% had anti-HBe. b) At the time of arrival recent infection by HBV was indicated by the presence of IgM anti-HBc in 57% of those positive for HBsAg and 21% in whom anti-HBc was the sole serological HBV marker. In 1987-88 no IgM anti-HBc was found in HBsAg-positive persons or in those with anti-HBc only. These results indicate that most HBV infections in this population had occurred before their arrival in Israel. There is a profound change in the epidemiology of HBV infection in this Ethiopian population following immigration, which is probably due to environmental changes as well as to vaccination against HBV of all young children aged less than or equal to 3 years.