Natural deep eutectic solvent-based microextraction for mercury speciation in water samples.

A new natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES)-based analytical method for mercury speciation in water samples is presented. A NADES (i.e., decanoic acid:DL-menthol in a molar ratio of 1:2) is used as an environmentally friendly extractant for separation and preconcentration using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction before LC-UV-Vis. Under optimal extraction conditions (i.e., NADES volume, 50 µL; sample pH, 12; volume of the complexing agent, 100 µL; extraction time, 3 min; centrifugation speed, 3000 rpm; and centrifugation time, 3 min), the limit of detection values were 0.9 µg L-1 for the organomercurial species and 3 µg L-1 for Hg2+, which had a slightly higher value. The relative standard deviation (RSD, n = 6) has been evaluated at two concentration levels (25 and 50 µg L-1) obtaining values for all the mercury complexes within the range of 6-12% and 8-12%, respectively. The trueness of the methodology has been evaluated using five real water samples from four different sources (i.e., tap, river, lake, and wastewater). The recovery tests have been performed in triplicate obtaining relative recoveries between 75 and 118%, with RSD (n = 3) between 1 and 19%, for all the mercury complexes in surface water samples. However, wastewater sample showed a significant matrix effect (recoveries ranged between 45 and 110%), probably due to the high amount of organic matter. Finally, the greenness of the method has also been evaluated by the analytical greenness metric for sample preparation (i.e., AGREEprep).

A novel non-invasive colorectal cancer diagnostic method: Volatile organic compounds as biomarkers.

INTRODUCTION: Population-based fecal tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have shown to reduce mortality thanks to the early detection of the disease. However, currently available fecal tests are limited in their sensitivity and specificity. Our aim is to look for volatile organic compounds in fecal samples as biomarkers for CRC detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty participants were included; 24 had adenocarcinoma, 24 had adenomatous polyps and 32 presented no neoplasms. Fecal samples were collected 48 h preceding the colonoscopy from all participants, except CRC patient samples that were collected after 3-4 weeks from the colonoscopy. Magnetic headspace adsorptive extraction (Mag-HSAE) followed by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) was performed on stool samples to identify volatile organic compounds as biomarkers. RESULTS: p-Cresol was significantly more abundant in the cancer samples (P < 0.001) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (CI 95%; 0.737-0.953), having a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 82%, respectively. In addition, 3(4H)-dibenzofuranone,4a,9b-dihydro-8,9b-dimethyl- (3(4H)-DBZ) was also more abundant in the cancer samples (P < 0.001) with an AUC of 0.77 (CI 95%; 0.635-0.905), sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 75%. When combined (p-cresol and 3(4H)-DBZ), the AUC was 0.86, sensitivity 87% and specificity 79%. p-Cresol also appeared to be promising as a biomarker for pre-malignant lesions with an AUC of 0.69 (CI 95%; 0.534-0.862), sensitivity 83% and specificity 63%, P = 0.045. CONCLUSIONS: Volatile organic compounds emitted from feces and determined by a sensitive analytical methodology (Mag-HSAE-TD-GC-MS), employing a magnetic graphene oxide as extractant phase, could be used as a potential screening technology for CRC and pre-malignant lesions.

Disentangling the mechanisms shaping the surface ocean microbiota.

BACKGROUND: The ocean microbiota modulates global biogeochemical cycles and changes in its configuration may have large-scale consequences. Yet, the underlying ecological mechanisms structuring it are unclear. Here, we investigate how fundamental ecological mechanisms (selection, dispersal and ecological drift) shape the smallest members of the tropical and subtropical surface-ocean microbiota: prokaryotes and minute eukaryotes (picoeukaryotes). Furthermore, we investigate the agents exerting abiotic selection on this assemblage as well as the spatial patterns emerging from the action of ecological mechanisms. To explore this, we analysed the composition of surface-ocean prokaryotic and picoeukaryotic communities using DNA-sequence data (16S- and 18S-rRNA genes) collected during the circumglobal expeditions Malaspina-2010 and TARA-Oceans. RESULTS: We found that the two main components of the tropical and subtropical surface-ocean microbiota, prokaryotes and picoeukaryotes, appear to be structured by different ecological mechanisms. Picoeukaryotic communities were predominantly structured by dispersal-limitation, while prokaryotic counterparts appeared to be shaped by the combined action of dispersal-limitation, selection and drift. Temperature-driven selection appeared as a major factor, out of a few selected factors, influencing species co-occurrence networks in prokaryotes but not in picoeukaryotes, indicating that association patterns may contribute to understand ocean microbiota structure and response to selection. Other measured abiotic variables seemed to have limited selective effects on community structure in the tropical and subtropical ocean. Picoeukaryotes displayed a higher spatial differentiation between communities and a higher distance decay when compared to prokaryotes, consistent with a scenario of higher dispersal limitation in the former after considering environmental heterogeneity. Lastly, random dynamics or drift seemed to have a more important role in structuring prokaryotic communities than picoeukaryotic counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The differential action of ecological mechanisms seems to cause contrasting biogeography, in the tropical and subtropical ocean, among the smallest surface plankton, prokaryotes and picoeukaryotes. This suggests that the idiosyncrasy of the main constituents of the ocean microbiota should be considered in order to understand its current and future configuration, which is especially relevant in a context of global change, where the reaction of surface ocean plankton to temperature increase is still unclear. Video Abstract.