Omalizumab protects against allergen- induced bronchoconstriction in allergic (immunoglobulin E-mediated) asthma.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab has been shown to suppress responses to inhaled allergens in allergic asthma patients with pretreatment immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≤700 IU/ml. To extend current dosing tables, we evaluated the potential of high omalizumab doses to block allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with higher IgE levels. METHODS: Asthmatic adults (18-65 years; body weight 40-150 kg) were divided into groups according to screening IgE (group 1: 30-300 IU/ml; group 2: 700-2,000 IU/ml) and randomized 2:1 to omalizumab/placebo every 2 or 4 weeks for 12-14 weeks. Allergen bronchoprovocation (ABP) testing was performed before treatment and at weeks 8 and 16. The primary efficacy endpoint, the early-phase allergic response (EAR), was defined as the maximum percentage drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s during the first 30 min after ABP. Serum free IgE was determined as a pharmacodynamic endpoint, and the exhaled fractional concentration of nitric oxide (FE(NO)) was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study. Omalizumab improved EAR; at week 8, EAR was 23.1% for placebo, 9.3% in group 1 (p = 0.018 versus placebo) and 5.6% in group 2 (p < 0.001). At week 16, EAR was 20%, 11.8% (p = 0.087) and 5.1% (p < 0.001), respectively. Free IgE decreased in groups 1 and 2 and remained <50 ng/ml in all patients during weeks 6-16. Omalizumab completely suppressed FE(NO) increases after ABP in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab blocked early asthmatic responses over a broad range of IgE/body weight combinations. Extending the dosing tables enables omalizumab to benefit a wider range of patients.

Imatinib does not induce cardiotoxicity at clinically relevant concentrations in preclinical studies.

Cytotoxic concentrations of imatinib mesylate (10-50 microM) were required to trigger markers of apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress response in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and fibroblasts, with no significant differences observed between c-Abl silenced and nonsilenced cells. In mice, oral or intraperitoneal imatinib treatment did not induce cardiovascular pathology or heart failure. In rats, high doses of oral imatinib did result in some cardiac hypertrophy. Multi-organ toxicities may have increased the cardiac workload and contributed to the cardiac hypertrophy observed in rats only. These data suggest that imatinib is not cardiotoxic at clinically relevant concentrations (5 microM).

Ketoconazole increases fingolimod blood levels in a drug interaction via CYP4F2 inhibition.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod is predominantly hydroxylated by cytochrome CYP4F2. In vitro experiments showed that ketoconazole significantly inhibited the oxidative metabolism of fingolimod by human liver microsomes and by recombinant CYP4F2. The authors used ketoconazole as a putative CYP4F2 inhibitor to quantify its influence on fingolimod pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. In a 2-period, single-sequence, crossover study, 22 healthy subjects received a single 5-mg dose of fingolimod in period 1. In period 2, subjects received ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily for 9 days and a single 5-mg dose of fingolimod coadministered on the 4th day of ketoconazole treatment. Ketoconazole did not affect fingolimod t(max) or half-life, but there was a weak average increase in C(max) of 1.22-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.15-1.30). The AUC over the 5 days of ketoconazole coadministration increased 1.40-fold (1.31-1.50), and the full AUC to infinity increased 1.71-fold (1.53-1.91). The AUC of the active metabolite fingolimod-phosphate was increased to a similar extent by 1.67-fold (1.50-1.85). Ketoconazole predose plasma levels were not altered by fingolimod. The magnitude of this interaction suggests that a proactive dose reduction of fingolimod is not necessary when adding ketoconazole to a fingolimod regimen. The clinician, however, should be aware of this interaction and bear in mind the possibility of a fingolimod dose reduction based on clinical monitoring.

The ability of atropine to prevent and reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The authors determined whether intravenous atropine can prevent or counteract the negative chronotropic effect of the immunomodulator fingolimod. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study, 12 healthy subjects received 5 mg fingolimod orally concurrently with intravenous atropine (titrated to a heart rate of 110-120 beats min(-1)) or intravenous placebo. A second group of 12 subjects received atropine/placebo 4 h after the fingolimod dose. Continuous telemetry measurements were made for 24 h after each fingolimod dose. RESULTS: Fingolimod administration alone yielded a heart rate nadir of 51 +/- 5 beats min(-1) at a median 4 h postdose with heart rate remaining depressed at 51-64 beats min(-1) over the rest of the day. Concurrent administration of fingolimod and atropine yielded a nadir of 66 +/- 6 beats min(-1) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.30 (1.22, 1.36). When atropine was administered at the time of the nadir, it was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod from a heart rate of 56 +/- 9 beats min(-1) (placebo) to 64 +/- 8 beats min(-1) (atropine) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio of 1.15 (1.04, 1.26). Atropine had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. CONCLUSIONS: Atropine administered concurrently with fingolimod prevented the heart rate nadir that typically occurs 4 h postdose. Atropine administered at the time of the heart rate nadir was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

Effects of imatinib (Glivec) on the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, a CYP2D6 substrate, in Chinese patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exhibits a competitive inhibition on the CYP450 2D6 isozyme with a K(i) value of 7.5 microm. However, the clinical significance of the inhibition and its relevance to 2D6 polymorphisms have not been evaluated. The pharmacokinetics of imatinib have been well studied in Caucasians, but not in a Chinese population. Metoprolol, a CYP2D6 substrate, has different clearances among patients with different CYP2D6 genotypes. It is often used as a CYP2D6 probe substrate for clinical drug-drug interaction studies. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Co-administration of imatinib at 400 mg twice daily increased the plasma AUC of metoprolol by approximately 23% in 20 Chinese patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), about 17% increase in CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers (IMs) (n = 6), 24% in extensive metabolizers (EMs) (n = 13), and 28% for the subject with unknown 2D6 status (n = 1) suggesting that imatinib has a weak to moderate inhibition on CYP2D6 in vivo. * The clearance of imatinib in Chinese patients with CML showed no difference between CYP2D6 IMs and EMs, and no major difference from Caucasian patients with CML based on data reported in the literature. AIMS To investigate the effect of imatinib on the pharmacokinetics of a CYP2D6 substrate, metoprolol, in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). The pharmacokinetics of imatinib were also studied in these patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 20) received a single oral dose of metoprolol 100 mg on day 1 after an overnight fast. On days 2-10, imatinib 400 mg was administered twice daily. On day 8, another 100 mg dose of metoprolol was administered 1 h after the morning dose of imatinib 400 mg. Blood samples for metoprolol and alpha-hydroxymetoprolol measurement were taken on study days 1 and 8, and on day 8 for imatinib. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients enrolled, six patients (30%) were CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers (IMs), 13 (65%) extensive metabolizers (EMs), and the CYP2D6 status in one patient was unknown. In the presence of 400 mg twice daily imatinib, the mean metoprolol AUC was increased by 17% in IMs (from 1190 to 1390 ng ml(-1) h), and 24% in EMs (from 660 to 818 ng ml(-1) h). Patients classified as CYP2D6 IMs had an approximately 1.8-fold higher plasma metoprolol exposure than those classified as EMs. The oral clearance of imatinib was 11.0 +/- 2.0 l h(-1) and 11.8 +/- 4.1 l h(-1) for CYP2D6 IMs and EMs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of a high dose of imatinib resulted in a small or moderate increase in metoprolol plasma exposure in all patients regardless of CYP2D6 status. The clearance of imatinib showed no difference between CYP2D6 IMs and EMs.

Effect of food, type of food, and time of food intake on deferasirox bioavailability: recommendations for an optimal deferasirox administration regimen.

Deferasirox (ICL670) is representative of a new class of tridentate iron chelators, formulated as tablets for dispersion. Deferasirox has exhibited high potency and a clinically manageable safety profile in preclinical models and in an extensive clinical program. The effect of food and time of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of deferasirox was investigated in healthy volunteers and patients with transfusional hemosiderosis. The bioequivalence of a single oral dose of deferasirox (20 mg/kg) was assessed following administration either before a high-fat or standard breakfast or concurrent with a standard breakfast in comparison with fasted conditions in healthy volunteers. The bioavailability of deferasirox was determined following a single oral dose (20 mg/kg) under fed and fasted conditions in patients. These data show that the type of food, caloric content, and fat content of the meal influence the bioavailability of deferasirox when consumed concomitantly. In contrast, this is not the case when deferasirox is administered at least 30 minutes before a meal. In conclusion, it is recommended that deferasirox be administered at least 30 minutes prior to meals. When this is not feasible, deferasirox should be administered consistently at the same time before meals to limit the sources of variability that affect absorption.

A mechanistic study to assess whether isoproterenol can reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) elicits a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates thereafter. The authors determined whether isoproterenol can counteract this effect. In this randomized, crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received 5 infusions of isoproterenol (titrated to increase heart rate to 100-120 bpm) or intravenous placebo. The first infusion was 2 hours before and the other 4 infusions were between 3 and 6 hours after a 5-mg oral dose of fingolimod. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected for 24 hours. During isoproterenol infusion 1 (before fingolimod administration), heart rate was increased 80% from preinfusion 68 +/- 9 bpm to a maximum 122 +/- 15 bpm. Administration of fingolimod decreased heart rate from 73 +/- 11 bpm predose to a nadir of 57 +/- 8 bpm. The subsequent isoproterenol infusion 2 in the presence of fingolimod increased mean heart rate by 85% to a maximum 105 +/- 21 bpm. A 41% higher total isoproterenol dose was needed to increase heart rate to the target range with fingolimod (97 +/- 6 mcg) compared with isoproterenol alone (69 +/- 27 mcg). Isoproterenol infusions 3 to 5 had similar effects on heart rate as infusion 2. Fingolimod had no significant influence on blood pressure responses to isoproterenol. Isoproterenol did not alter the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. The pure beta-agonist isoproterenol can reverse the heart rate reduction that occurs transiently after initiating fingolimod treatment.

The effect on heart rate of combining single-dose fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) is known to elicit a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates over time with continued dosing. The authors determined the effect of combining a single dose of fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem on heart rate and mean arterial pressure. METHODS: In a partially randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, crossover study, 25 healthy subjects received (1) a single oral 5-mg dose of fingolimod, (2) either 50 mg atenolol or 240 mg diltiazem once daily for 5 days, and (3) the antihypertensive for 5 days and a single dose of fingolimod on day 5. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected. RESULTS: The daytime mean heart rate nadir was 15% lower when fingolimod was combined with atenolol (42 +/- 7 bpm) compared with fingolimod alone (51 +/- 9 bpm) yielding a combination/monotherapy ratio of 0.85 (90%CI, 0.79-0.92). The daytime mean heart rate nadir from fingolimod alone (55 +/- 5 bpm) was not altered when combined with diltiazem (56 +/- 8 bpm) yielding a ratio of 0.99 (0.94-1.05). There was no clinically relevant change in mean arterial pressure when fingolimod was administered with atenolol or diltiazem compared with administration of the drugs alone in normotensive subjects. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were not altered during coadministration. CONCLUSION: Adding fingolimod to a beta-blocker such as atenolol resulted in a moderately lower mean heart rate nadir compared with fingolimod alone. However, subjects who had a stronger negative chronotropic response to fingolimod alone (nadir < 50 bpm) had minimal or no further reduction in heart rate with the drug combination. Adding fingolimod to a calcium channel blocker such as diltiazem did not further lower the heart rate compared to fingolimod alone.

The effect of age, gender, and body mass index on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin in healthy volunteers.

UNLABELLED: What is already known about this subject. Vildagliptin is a new, potent, and selective inhibitor of DPP-4. The efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes has been intensively studied in diverse subject populations. There has been little information published about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin. What this study adds. No clinically relevant changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics were observed between young and elderly, male and female, or high body mass index (BMI) and low BMI subjects. The results suggest that no dose modification is necessary for vildagliptin based on the age, gender, or BMI of a subject. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin. METHODS: Forty healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 100 mg vildagliptin to assess the effects of age, gender, and BMI on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, reflected by the time course of inhibition of DPP-4 activity, of vildagliptin. RESULTS: Peak concentration and exposure (AUC((0-infinity))) of vildagliptin were 17% (90% CI 2, 35%) and 31% (90% CI 18, 45%) higher in elderly vs. young subjects. Renal clearance was reduced by 32% (90% CI 17, 45%) in elderly subjects. The pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin were not significantly influenced by gender or BMI. Inhibition of DPP-4 activity was similar regardless of age, gender, or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of a single oral 100 mg dose of vildagliptin were not affected by gender and BMI. Exposure to vildagliptin was higher in elderly patients, but this was not associated with any difference in the effect of DPP-4 inhibition. Based on these results, no vildagliptin dose adjustment is necessary for age, gender, or BMI.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between vildagliptin and digoxin in healthy volunteers.

Vildagliptin is a novel antidiabetic agent that is an orally active, potent, and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV, the enzyme responsible for degradation of the incretin hormones. This open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study investigated the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions in 18 healthy subjects during coadministration of vildagliptin and digoxin. Subjects were randomized to receive each of 3 treatments: vildagliptin 100 mg qd, digoxin (0.5 mg, then 0.25 mg qd on days 2-7), and the combination vildagliptin/digoxin for 7 days. Coadministration of digoxin with vildagliptin had no effect on exposure to vildagliptin (geometric mean ratios [90% confidence interval]: AUC(0-24h), 0.99 [0.95-1.03]; C(max), 0.95 [0.85-1.06]) or to digoxin (AUC(0-24h), 1.02 [0.94-1.12]; C(max), 1.08 [0.97-1.20]). In addition, no changes in t(max), t((1/2)), and CL/F were observed for either drug. These results indicate that no dose adjustment is necessary when vildagliptin and digoxin are coadministered.