Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
1.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 60(1): 16-22, enero 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-229517

RESUMEN

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of occupational exposure on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory symptoms in the general Spanish population.MethodsThis was a study nested in the Spanish EPISCAN II cross-sectional epidemiological study that included participants who had completed a structured questionnaire on their occupational history, a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, and forced spirometry. The data were analyzed using Chi-square and Student's t tests and adjusted models of multiple linear regression and logistic regression.ResultsWe studied 7502 subjects, 51.1% women, with a mean age of 60±11 years. Overall, 53.2% reported some respiratory symptoms, 7.9% had respiratory symptoms during their work activity, 54.2% were or had been smokers, and 11.3% (851 subjects) met COPD criteria on spirometry. A total of 3056 subjects (40.7%) reported exposure to vapors, gases, dust or fumes (VGDF); occupational exposure to VGDF was independently associated with the presence of COPD (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03–1.44), respiratory symptoms (OR 1.45, 95%: CI 1.30–1.61), and respiratory symptoms at work (OR 4.69, 95% CI: 3.82–5.77), with a population attributable fraction for COPD of 8.2%.ConclusionsOccupational exposure is associated with a higher risk of COPD and respiratory symptoms in the Spanish population. These results highlight the need to follow strict prevention measures to protect the respiratory health of workers. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Espirometría , Exposición Profesional , Tabaquismo , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 60(1): 16-22, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176851

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of occupational exposure on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory symptoms in the general Spanish population. METHODS: This was a study nested in the Spanish EPISCAN II cross-sectional epidemiological study that included participants who had completed a structured questionnaire on their occupational history, a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, and forced spirometry. The data were analyzed using Chi-square and Student's t tests and adjusted models of multiple linear regression and logistic regression. RESULTS: We studied 7502 subjects, 51.1% women, with a mean age of 60±11 years. Overall, 53.2% reported some respiratory symptoms, 7.9% had respiratory symptoms during their work activity, 54.2% were or had been smokers, and 11.3% (851 subjects) met COPD criteria on spirometry. A total of 3056 subjects (40.7%) reported exposure to vapors, gases, dust or fumes (VGDF); occupational exposure to VGDF was independently associated with the presence of COPD (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44), respiratory symptoms (OR 1.45, 95%: CI 1.30-1.61), and respiratory symptoms at work (OR 4.69, 95% CI: 3.82-5.77), with a population attributable fraction for COPD of 8.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure is associated with a higher risk of COPD and respiratory symptoms in the Spanish population. These results highlight the need to follow strict prevention measures to protect the respiratory health of workers.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Gases , Espirometría , Polvo , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Redox Biol ; 68: 102957, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37977043

RESUMEN

Progressive respiratory failure is the primary cause of death in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It is the final outcome of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by an initial exacerbated inflammatory response, metabolic derangement and ultimate tissue scarring. A positive balance of cellular energy may result crucial for the recovery of clinical COVID-19. Hence, we asked if two key pathways involved in cellular energy generation, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) signaling and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) could be beneficial. We tested the drugs metformin (AMPK activator) and baicalin (CPT1A activator) in different experimental models mimicking COVID-19 associated inflammation in lung and kidney. We also studied two different cohorts of COVID-19 patients that had been previously treated with metformin. These drugs ameliorated lung damage in an ARDS animal model, while activation of AMPK/ACC signaling increased mitochondrial function and decreased TGF-ß-induced fibrosis, apoptosis and inflammation markers in lung epithelial cells. Similar results were observed with two indole derivatives, IND6 and IND8 with AMPK activating capacity. Consistently, a reduced time of hospitalization and need of intensive care was observed in COVID-19 patients previously exposed to metformin. Baicalin also mitigated the activation of pro-inflammatory bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and reduced kidney fibrosis in two animal models of kidney injury, another key target of COVID-19. In human epithelial lung and kidney cells, both drugs improved mitochondrial function and prevented TGF-ß-induced renal epithelial cell dedifferentiation. Our results support that favoring cellular energy production through enhanced FAO may prove useful in the prevention of COVID-19-induced lung and renal damage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Metformina , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Animales , Humanos , Metformina/farmacología , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Quinasas Activadas por AMP/metabolismo , Riñón/metabolismo , Pulmón/metabolismo , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta , Fibrosis , Ácidos Grasos
4.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 59(11): 717-724, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37500327

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is still uncertainty about which aspects of cigarette smoking influence the risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to estimate the COPD risk as related to duration of use, intensity of use, lifetime tobacco consumption, age of smoking initiation and years of abstinence. METHODS: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study based on data from the EPISCAN-II study (n=9092). All participants underwent a face-to-face interview and post-bronchodilator spirometry was performed. COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<70%. Parametric and nonparametric logistic regression models with generalized additive models were used. RESULTS: 8819 persons were included; 858 with COPD and 7961 without COPD. The COPD risk increased with smoking duration up to ≥50 years [OR 3.5 (95% CI: 2.3-5.4)], with smoking intensity up to ≥39cig/day [OR 10.1 (95% CI: 5.3-18.4)] and with lifetime tobacco consumption up to >29 pack-years [OR 3.8 (95% CI: 3.1-4.8)]. The COPD risk for those who started smoking at 22 or later was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.4). The risk of COPD decreased with increasing years of cessation. In comparison with both never smokers and current smokers, the lowest risk of COPD was found after 15-25 years of abstinence. CONCLUSION: COPD risk increases with duration, intensity, and lifetime tobacco consumption and decreases importantly with years of abstinence. Age at smoking initiation shows no effect. After 15-25 years of cessation, COPD risk could be equal to that of a never smoker. This work suggests that the time it takes to develop COPD in a smoker is about 30 years.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Espirometría , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado
5.
ERJ Open Res ; 9(1)2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36814553

RESUMEN

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is commonly diagnosed when the airflow limitation is well established and symptomatic. We aimed to identify individuals at risk of developing COPD according to the concept of pre-COPD and compare their clinical characteristics with 1) those who have developed the disease at a young age, and 2) the overall population with and without COPD. Methods: The EPISCAN II study is a cross-sectional, population-based study that aims to investigate the prevalence of COPD in Spain in subjects ≥40 years of age. Pre-COPD was defined as the presence of emphysema >5% and/or bronchial thickening by computed chromatography (CT) scan and/or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) <80% of predicted in subjects with respiratory symptoms and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) >0.70. Young COPD was defined as FEV1/FVC <0.70 in a subject ≤50 years of age. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared among pre-COPD, young COPD and the overall population with and without COPD. Results: Among the 1077 individuals with FEV1/FVC <0.70, 65 (6.0%) were ≤50 years of age. Among the 8015 individuals with FEV1/FVC >0.70, 350 underwent both D LCO testing and chest CT scanning. Of those, 78 (22.3%) subjects fulfilled the definition of pre-COPD. Subjects with pre-COPD were older, predominantly women, less frequently active or ex-smokers, with less frequent previous diagnosis of asthma but with higher symptomatic burden than those with young COPD. Conclusions: 22.3% of the studied population was at risk of developing COPD, with similar symptomatic and structural changes to those with well-established disease without airflow obstruction. This COPD at-risk population is different from those that develop COPD at a young age.

6.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 10(1)2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36707127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population distribution of reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in smokers and main consequences are not properly recognised. The objectives of this study were to describe the prevalence of reduced DLCO in a population-based sample of current and former smoker subjects without airflow limitation and to describe its morphological, functional and clinical implications. METHODS: A sample of 405 subjects aged 40 years or older with postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FVC) >0.70 was obtained from a random population-based sample of 9092 subjects evaluated in the EPISCAN II study. Baseline evaluation included clinical questionnaires, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) measurement, spirometry, DLCO determination, 6 min walk test, routine blood analysis and low-dose CT scan with evaluation of lung density and airway wall thickness. RESULTS: In never, former and current smokers, prevalence of reduced DLCO was 6.7%, 14.4% and 26.7%, respectively. Current and former smokers with reduced DLCO without airflow limitation were younger than the subjects with normal DLCO, and they had greater levels of dyspnoea and exhaled CO, greater pulmonary artery diameter and lower spirometric parameters, 6 min walk distance, daily physical activity and plasma albumin levels (all p<0.05), with no significant differences in other chronic respiratory symptoms or CT findings. FVC and exhaled CO were identified as independent risk factors for low DLCO. CONCLUSION: Reduced DLCO is a frequent disorder among smokers without airflow limitation, associated with decreased exercise capacity and with CT findings suggesting that it may be a marker of smoking-induced early vascular damage. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03028207.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Fumadores , Monóxido de Carbono , Prevalencia , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
7.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 59(3): 142-151, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549937

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We aim to describe the changes in prevalence and risk factors associated to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Spain, comparing three population-based studies conducted in three timepoints. METHODS: We compared participants from IBERPOC conducted in 1997, EPISCAN conducted in 2007 and EPISCAN II in 2017. COPD was defined as a postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in 1s/forced vital capacity) ratio <0.70, according to GOLD criteria; subsequently, also as the FEV1/FVC below the lower limit of normal (LLN). RESULTS: COPD prevalence in the population between 40 and 69 years decreased from 21.6% (95% CI 20.7%-23.2%) in 1997 to 8.8% (95% CI 8.2%-9.5%) in 2017, a 59.2% decline (p<0.001). In 2007, the prevalence was 7.7% (95% CI 6.8%-8.7%) with an upward trend of 1.1 percentage points in 2017 (p=0.073). Overall COPD prevalence decreased in men and women, although a significant increase was observed in the last decade in females (p<0.05). Current smokers significantly increased in the last decades (25.4% in 1997, 29.1% in 2007 and 23.4% in 2017; p<0.001). Regrettably, COPD underdiagnosis was constantly high, 77.6% in 1997, 78.4% in 2007, and to 78.2% in 2017 (p=0.95), higher in younger ages (40-49 yrs and 50-59 yrs) and also higher in women than in men in all three studies (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We report a significant reduction of 59.2% in the prevalence of COPD in Spain from 1997 to 2017 in subjects aged 40-69 years. Our study highlights the significant underdiagnosis of COPD, particularly sustained in women and younger populations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , España , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Capacidad Vital , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Factores de Riesgo , Espirometría , Prevalencia
8.
ERJ Open Res ; 8(4)2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36382234

RESUMEN

Background: Few large epidemiological studies have analysed the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and their determinants in the general adult population. We investigated the prevalence and determinants of respiratory symptoms and compared their prevalence with that of two previous studies conducted in 1999 and 2009. Method: EPISCAN II was a multicentre, cross-sectional, population-based epidemiological study in individuals older than 40 years. Results: A total of 9092 individuals were included. Up to 47.5% reported at least one respiratory symptom, being more frequent in women than in men (49.4% versus 45.5%, p=0.0002) and with wheezing being the most frequent (33.7%) followed by dyspnoea (26.8%). The presence of any symptom was associated with female sex, higher body mass index (BMI), lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 % pred), reduced physical activity, a higher Charlson index and the presence of anxiety and depression. Smoking was also significantly associated with having at least one respiratory symptom in a dose-response fashion (OR: 1.415, 1.916, 2.192 and 2.987 for 0-10, 10-20, 20-30 and >30 pack-years, respectively, all p<0.0001). The prevalence of symptoms remained quite similar over the last 20 years (wheezing 40%, 36% and 33.7% and dyspnoea 10.4%, 9.9% and 13.1% in 1999, 2009 and 2019, respectively). Conclusions: Approximately half of the adult Spanish population have respiratory symptoms and this prevalence has remained quite stable over the last 20 years. Smoking remains the main factor associated with respiratory symptoms, but female sex, comorbidities, high BMI and low FEV1 and low physical activity are also significantly associated with respiratory symptoms.

9.
Respir Res ; 23(1): 49, 2022 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35248041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blood eosinophils are considered a biomarker for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Population-based studies are needed to better understand the determinants of the blood eosinophil count (BEC) in individuals with and without COPD. METHODS: EPISCAN II is a multicentre, cross-sectional, population-based epidemiological study aimed at investigating the prevalence and determinants of COPD in Spain. Study subjects were randomly selected from the general population, and COPD was defined by a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7. For the pre-specified outcomes related to BEC, the first 35 COPD and 35 non-COPD subjects were consecutively recruited in 12 of the participating centres with the objective of analysing 400 individuals in each group. Baseline BEC and its association with demographic, clinical and functional variables were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 326 COPD and 399 non-COPD subjects were included in the analysis. The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 63.2 years (11.0), 46.3% were male, and 27.6% were active smokers. BEC was significantly higher in individuals with COPD [192 cells/µL (SD: 125) vs. 160 cells/µL (SD: 114); p = 0.0003]. In a stepwise multivariate model, being male, active smoker and having a previous diagnosis of asthma were independently associated with having a higher BEC. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study estimated the distribution of eosinophils in the healthy adult population and concluded that COPD patients have a significantly higher BEC. Male sex, active smoking and concomitant asthma were significantly associated with a higher BEC.


Asunto(s)
Eosinofilia/epidemiología , Eosinófilos/patología , Vigilancia de la Población , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Eosinofilia/sangre , Eosinofilia/etiología , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología
10.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 35(1): 16-29, feb.-mar. 2022. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-205305

RESUMEN

Lower respiratory tract infections, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (COPD-E) and community acquired pneumonia (CAP), are one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in primary care and hospital emergency departments, and are the cause of a high prescription of antimicrobial agents. The selection of the most appropriate oral antibiotic treatment is based on different aspects and includes to first consider a bacterial aetiology and not a viral infection, to know the bacterial pathogen that most frequently cause these infections and the frequency of their local antimicrobial resistance. Treatment should also be prescribed quickly and antibiotics should be selected among those with a quicker mode of action, achieving the greatest effect in the shortest time and with the fewest adverse effects (toxicity, interactions, resistance and/or ecological impact). Whenever possible, antimicrobials should be rotated and diversified and switched to the oral route as soon as possible. With these premises, the oral treatment guidelines for mild or moderate COPD-E and CAP in Spain include as first options betalactam antibiotics (amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefditoren), in certain situations associated with a macrolide, and relegating fluoroquinolones as an alternative, except in cases where the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is suspected (AU)


Las infecciones del tracto respiratorio inferior, incluyendo las exacerbaciones de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) y la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC), son uno de los motivos de consulta más frecuentes en atención primaria y los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios, y son la causa de una elevada prescripción de antimicrobianos. La selección del tratamiento oral más adecuado con antibióticos se basa en diferentes aspectos e incluye considerar en primer lugar una etiología bacteriana y no una infección vírica, conocer los patógenos bacterianos que más frecuentemente causa estas infecciones y la frecuencia local de su resistencia antimicrobiana. Además, el tratamiento debe prescribirse rápidamente y los antibióticos deben seleccionarse entre los que tienen un modo de acción más rápido, logrando el mayor efecto en el menor tiempo y con el menor número de efectos adversos (toxicidad, interacciones, resistencia y/o impacto ecológico). Siempre que sea posible, hay que rotar y diversificar los antimicrobianos y pasar a la vía oral lo antes posible. Con estas premisas, las guías de tratamiento oral de la exacerbación leve o moderada de la EPOC y NAC en España incluyen como primera opción los antibióticos betalactámicos (amoxicilina y amoxicilina-clavulánico y cefditoreno), en determinadas situaciones asociados a un macrólido, y relegando las fluoroquinolonas como alternativa, salvo en los casos en que se sospeche la presencia de Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Antibacterianos , Infecciones Bacterianas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Neumonía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA