Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(12): 1686-92, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613743

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest that using additional neuroaxial anaesthesia during oncological surgery is associated with favourable recurrence-free survival, when compared with general anaesthesia alone. We assessed the impact of adjunctive perioperative spinal anaesthesia and dose of opioids on the oncological long-term outcome of patients following radical prostatectomy. METHODS: We selected patients from our institutional review board-approved database who consecutively underwent radical prostatectomy between 2002 and 2007. Patients were stratified by type of anaesthesia, administered as general anaesthesia alone, or spinal anaesthesia in addition to general anaesthesia. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were analysed by a multivariate Cox regression model and by Kaplan-Meier analysis in propensity-score based matched cohorts, adjusted for standard clinico-pathological variables and year of surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 4772 patients were analysed. Regarding the type of anaesthesia no significant difference for biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival was analysed by a multivariate Cox regression model (p = 0.5, 0.8 and 0.7). The Kaplan-Meier analyses after propensity-score matched based comparisons revealed no significant difference depending on type of anaesthesia for biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.6, 0.1 and 0.4). The same accounted for a propensity-score matched model adjusted for the year of surgery on biochemical recurrence-free survival (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: The oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy was not affected by the adjunctive use of spinal anaesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/métodos , Anestesia Raquidea , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Anaesthesist ; 58(12): 1226-30, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20012245

RESUMEN

After problem-free induction of narcosis in an 84-year-old female patient an intra-operative drop in sevoflurane and oxygen concentrations occurred during low-flow anesthesia. Although the concentrations of sevoflurane and oxygen in the fresh gas flow were increased no adequate elevation of the inspiratory concentrations could be achieved. Disconnection of the Dräger Primus IE manual bag-valve-mask could be identified as the cause of the drop in concentrations. Interestingly no error alarm function was initiated. This case demonstrates how important knowledge of the function, set-up and alarm conditions of respiratory machines is. This should be an important component of training in anesthesiology as well as securely established algorithms for difficult ventilation to ensure safe anesthesia despite technical failures.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia por Inhalación , Anestésicos por Inhalación/sangre , Éteres Metílicos/sangre , Ventiladores Mecánicos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Alarmas Clínicas , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Respiración Artificial , Mecánica Respiratoria , Sevoflurano
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA