Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index >70 kg/m2.

BACKGROUND: Sparse published data support the optimal surgical management of megaobesity (body mass index >70 kg/m(2)). The purpose of the present study was to compare laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ORYGB) in megaobese patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 89 consecutive patients with a body mass index >70 kg/m(2) who underwent LRYGB or ORYGB from January 2003 to May 2007 at the Ohio State University Medical Center. RESULTS: LRYGB was performed in 37 patients, with 3 conversions to open surgery, and 52 underwent ORYGB. No statistically significant demographic or preoperative co-morbidity differences were discerned. The mean intraoperative blood loss was lower in the LRYGB group (54 mL versus 211 mL; P < .0001). The median length of stay for both LRYGB and ORYGB groups was 4 days. One patient in the open group died. The postoperative complications were statistically equivalent between the 2 groups. The hernia rate for the LRYGB group was 3% and was 19% in the ORYGB group (P = .02). The patients who underwent LRYGB had greater excess body weight loss at 3 (22.7% versus 17.5%, P = .02) and 6 (37.5% versus 30.5%, P = .03) months. However, the average excess body weight loss at 12 and 24 months was similar (48% and 60%, respectively). CONCLUSION: LRYGB is a technically feasible and safe surgical approach in the megaobese. The intraoperative blood loss was less with LRYGB than with ORYGB. The overall mortality and complications were not different, with the exception of hernia frequency, which was significantly greater after ORYGB. The percentage of excess body weight loss at 3 and 6 months was better for the LRYGB group. In both groups of patients, the 12- and 24-month excess body weight loss were similar.

Do gastrotomies require repair after endoscopic transgastric peritoneoscopy? A controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for closing gastrotomies after transgastric instrumentation has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To compare gastrotomy closure with endoscopically delivered bioabsorbable plugs with no closure. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. SETTING: Animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three dogs undergoing endoscopic transgastric peritoneoscopy between July and August 2007. INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic anterior wall gastrotomies were performed with balloon dilation to allow passage of the endoscope into the peritoneal cavity. The plug group (n = 12) underwent endoscopic placement of a 4 x 6-cm bioabsorbable mesh plug in the perforation, whereas the no-treatment group (n = 11) did not. Animals underwent necropsy 2 weeks after the procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications related to gastrotomy closure, gastric burst pressures, relationship of burst perforation to gastrotomy, and the degree of adhesions and inflammation at the gastrotomy site. RESULTS: After the gastrotomy, all dogs survived without any complications. At necropsy, burst pressures were 77 +/- 11 mm Hg and 76 +/- 15 mm Hg (P = .9) in the plug group and no-treatment group, respectively. Perforations occurred at the site of the gastrotomy in 2 of 12 animals in the plug group and in none of the 11 dogs in the no-treatment group (P = .5). Finally, there were minimal adhesions in all dogs (11/11) in the no-treatment group and minimal adhesions in 3 and moderate adhesions or inflammatory masses in 9 of the 12 animals in the plug group (P = .004). LIMITATIONS: Small number of subjects, animal model, no randomization. Gastrotomy trauma during short peritoneoscopy may not be applicable to longer procedures. CONCLUSIONS: After endoscopic gastrotomy, animals that were left untreated did not show any clinical ill effects and demonstrated adequate healing, with fewer adhesions and less inflammation compared with those treated with a bioabsorbable plug.

Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans.

INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a rapidly evolving field that provides endoscopic access to the peritoneum via a natural orifice. One important requirement of this technique is the need to minimize the risk of clinically significant peritoneal contamination. We report the bacterial load and contamination of the peritoneal cavity in ten patients who underwent diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy. METHODS: Patients participating in this trial were scheduled to undergo diagnostic laparoscopy for evaluation of presumed pancreatic cancer. Findings at diagnostic laparoscopy were compared with those of diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy, using an orally placed gastroscope, blinding the endoscopist to the laparoscopic findings. We performed no gastric decontamination. Diagnostic findings, operative times, and clinical course were recorded. Gastroscope and peritoneal fluid aspirates were obtained prior to and after the gastrotomy. Each sample was sent for bacterial colony counts, culture, and identification of species. RESULTS: Ten patients, with an average age of 63.7 years, have completed the protocol. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy followed by successful transgastric access and diagnostic peritoneoscopy. The average time for laparoscopy was 7.2 min, compared with 18 min for transgastric instrumentation. Bacterial sampling was obtained in all ten patients. The average number of colony-forming units (CFU) in the gastroscope aspirate was 132.1 CFU/ml, peritoneal aspirates prior to creation of a gastrotomy showed 160.4 CFU/ml, and peritoneal sampling after gastrotomy had an average of 642.1 CFU/ml. There was no contamination of the peritoneal cavity with species isolated from the gastroscope aspirate. No infectious complications or leaks were noted at 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically significant contamination of the peritoneal cavity from the gastroscope after transgastric endoscopic instrumentation in humans. Transgastric instrumentation does contaminate the abdominal cavity but, the pathogens do not mount a clinically significant response in terms of either the species or the bacterial load.

Endolumenal fundoplication with EsophyX: the initial North American experience.

EsophyX is a novel endolumenal therapeutic option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The device is passed into the stomach, where it deploys a series of full-thickness fasteners to create a neogastroesophageal valve. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the safety and characterize the effectiveness of this approach in the initial North American experience. This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients with GERD who had undergone endolumenal fundoplication with the EsophyX device. At follow-up, proton pump inhibitor usage was elicited and 2 validated questionnaires were administered measuring GERD health-related quality of life (range 0-50) and symptom severity (range 0-72). In limited preliminary evaluation, the initial North American experience with endolumenal fundoplication using the EsophyX device is that it appears to be safe and provides moderate effectiveness in treating the symptoms of GERD. Further studies comparing this technique with conventional medical and surgical therapies are necessary.

Optimizing physician staffing and resource allocation: sine-wave variation in hourly trauma admission volume.

BACKGROUND: Trauma centers are faced with the challenge of managing an increasing volume of patients in an era of fewer trauma care providers and fewer hospitals providing trauma care. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between hourly admission volume, injury severity, resource utilization, and outcomes. METHODS: All patients in the National Trauma Data Bank admitted between 1999 and 2002 were selected. Analysis included demographics, temporal information, injury severity, and outcome parameters. RESULTS: A total of 421,997 patients were admitted to participating centers. The 24-hour admission distribution described a sine-wave pattern with a trough at 6:00 am and a peak at 7:00 pm. The sine-wave pattern persisted regardless of the subgroup analyzed. Patients admitted between 12:00 am and 6:00 am were more likely to be severely injured, require intensive care unit admission, undergo emergent operation, and die during hospitalization when compared with patients admitted between 7:00 am and 12:00 pm. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma admissions conform to a sine-wave pattern with a 3.5-fold increase in admissions between morning and evening hours. This has significant implications for manpower and resource allocation with additional resources needed in the hours around 7:00 pm and later. Educational and administrative activities are best scheduled during low-volume morning hours. Nighttime admissions are higher risk and thus more likely to need senior-level expertise and consume hospital resources. Trauma centers should use these findings to improve outcomes by developing optimal staffing patterns and matching resource allocation to need as a function of time.