[Impact of partial nephrectomy in a hybrid operating room on the activity of kidney cancer surgery]. / Évaluation de l'utilisation de la salle hybride sur l'activité de chirurgie en cancérologie rénale.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy (NP) after embolization of tumor vessels (NPESH) in a hybrid room combines embolization of tumor vessels and enucleation of the tumor under laparoscopy in the same operative time. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the use of NPESH in the management of patients treated with surgery for a localized kidney tumor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using the uroCCR database, we included all consecutive patients operated in a university hospital for localized kidney tumor. From 2011 to May 2015, patients were treated by Standard Partial Nephrectomy (NPS) Laparoscopic or Open and from May 2015 to May 2019 by NPESH. We evaluated characteristics of patients, tumors, perioperative data and complications. These data were compared by Student and Khi2 tests. RESULTS: 87 NPS were performed during Period 1 and 137 NPS were performed during period 2. The ASA score of patients undergoing NPESH was higher than NPS (P<0.0001). The tumor complexity and median tumor size were similar in the two groups (P=0.852 and P=0.48). The complication rate for NPS and NPESH was 55.2% and 33.6% (P=0.002). There were less severe complications in the NEPSH group (P=0.012). The median length of stay was 8 and 4 days for the NPS and NPESH groups (P<0.0001). Positive surgical margins were 2 (2.3%) and 6 (4.6%) for the NPS and NPESH group (P=0.713). DISCUSSION: NPESH is an efficient technique compared to NPS. It seems to be an interesting alternative to limit renal ischemia, complication rate and length of stay for the management of localized kidney tumors.

[Management of metastatic renal cell carcinomass]. / Prise en charge des métastases du cancer du rein.

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma had changed over the last ten years with the apparition of new treatments and advances in surgery and ablative techniques. The therapies for metastatic patients have also been personalized and different prognostic groups have been established to adapt the treatment to the severity of the disease. Surgical excision, radiotherapy or ablative therapy could be proposed for patients with isolated metastasis and good condition to delay the systemic therapy initiation. Until 2006, in case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, immunotherapy (IL-2 and TNF-alpha) was proposed. Targeted therapies acting on angiogenesis mechanisms have also been developed. Recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic management and has improved the overall survival of patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. For each patient, a multidisciplinary management is organized with a personal therapeutic project. This global management needs coordination with the medical team and also need a good communication with the patient, his entourage and his doctor.