RESUMEN
Current trends in pronounced late-stage attrition rates of promising drug candidates are a pressing concern for patients, providers, and other stakeholders across the health care system. Here, we describe six areas in which clinical pharmacology methods and frameworks can help ameliorate these trends in late-stage attrition and increase the efficiency of drug development and evaluation. These recommendations are based, in part, on previous stakeholder engagement and input, as well as a previously published white paper.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Diseño de Fármacos , Farmacología Clínica/tendencias , Aprobación de Drogas , Objetivos , Humanos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Off-label drug use is common in oncology, due in part to significant unmet medical need, the rarity of many cancers, and the difficulty of conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support labeling of every drug in every disease setting. As new drugs are developed for use in tumors defined by genomic aberrations, it may be scientifically reasonable to expect that a targeted anti-cancer agent with efficacy in a biomarker-defined population within one tumor type may also have activity in another tumor type expressing the same biomarker. Such expectations also fuel off-label prescribing. However, the current approach to prescribing targeted agents off-label does not capture patient outcomes, thus missing an opportunity to gather data that could validate this approach. We explore the potential for collecting such data, highlight two proposals for oncology-specific patient registries, and put forward considerations that should be addressed to move toward better evidence development around off-label use.
