Diagnosis, Management, and Follow-Up of the Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Mass: CUA Guideline Endorsed by the AUA.

PURPOSE: Incidental adrenal masses are common and require a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and management that includes family physicians, urologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The purpose of this guideline is to provide an updated approach to the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas, with a special focus on the areas of discrepancy/controversy existing among the published guidelines from other associations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This guideline was developed by the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) through a working group comprised of urologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists and subsequently endorsed by the American Urological Association (AUA). A systematic review utilizing the GRADE approach served as the basis for evidence-based recommendations with consensus statements provided in the absence of evidence. For each guideline statement, the strength of recommendation was reported as weak or strong, and the quality of evidence was evaluated as low, medium, or high. RESULTS: The CUA working group provided evidence- and consensus-based recommendations based on an updated systematic review and subject matter expertise. Important updates on evidence-based radiological evaluation and hormonal testing are included in the recommendations. This guideline clarifies which patients may benefit from surgery and highlights where short term surveillance is appropriate. CONCLUSION: Incidentally detected adrenal masses require a comprehensive assessment of hormonal function and oncologic risk. This guideline provides a contemporary approach to the appropriate clinical, radiographic, and endocrine assessments required for the evaluation, management, and follow-up of patients with such lesions.

Implementation, results and face validity of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure in a Canadian department of surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure, a validated questionnaire designed to assess patients' perceptions of their physician's communication skills and empathy, has been used to assess empathy in medical specialties but has seldom been applied to surgery. We assessed empathy and communication skills among a group of surgeons within a single academic institution. METHODS: All surgeons within our department of surgery were invited to participate. Patients seen in clinics of participating surgeons were recruited prospectively from July 2018 to February 2019. At the end of each clinical encounter, they were asked to complete a CARE survey. Surveys were analyzed according to previously validated inclusion and exclusion criteria. We calculated mean scores for each surgeon and surgical division. About 6 months after study completion, surgeons were provided with their individual score and de-identified division scores, and were asked to complete a follow-up survey assessing their attitudes toward the CARE Measure. RESULTS: Of the 82 surgeons invited, 51 (62%) agreed to participate; 7 had fewer than 25 completed surveys and were excluded from analysis. A total of 1801 surveys for 44 surgeons (33 male and 11 female) were included in the final analysis. The average CARE score across the department was 46.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.6-47.1). Female surgeons received significantly higher scores than male surgeons (mean 47.6 [95% CI 47.1-48.0] v. 46.7 [95% CI 46.4-48.0]). Of the 35 surgeons who responded to the follow-up survey, 31 (89%) felt that the questions in the CARE Measure applied to their practice, and half of these reported that they intended to make changes in response to the feedback. CONCLUSION: We found high communication and empathy scores among surgeons in the outpatient setting, with enough variability to encourage continued improvement. The CARE Measure appears to have face validity among surgeons, and the vast majority found it relevant to their practice. Further study is needed to formally assess the relevance, performance, reliability and construct validity of this measure.

A high-fidelity, virtual-reality, transurethral resection of bladder tumor simulator: Validation as a tool for training.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training is used to help trainees learn surgical procedures in a safe environment. The objective of our study was to test the face, content, and construct validity of the transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) module built on the Simbionix TURP Mentor simulator. METHODS: Participants performed five standardized cases on the simulator. Domains of the simulator were evaluated on a five-point Likert scale to establish face and content validity. Construct validity was assessed through the simulator's built-in scoring metrics, as well as video recordings of the simulator screen and an anonymized view of participants' hands and feet, which were evaluated using an objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) tool. RESULTS: Ten experienced operators and 15 novices participated. Face validity was somewhat acceptable (mean realism 3.8/5±1.03 standard deviation [SD]; mean appearance 4.1/5±0.57), as was content validity, represented by simulation of key steps (mean 3.9±0.57). The simulator failed to achieve construct validity. There was no difference in mean simulator scores or OSATS scoring between experienced operators and novices. Novices significantly improved their mean simulator scores (305.9 vs. 332.4, p=0.006) and OSATS scoring (15.8 vs. 18.1, p=0.001), while 87% felt their confidence to perform TURBT improved. Overall, 92% of participants agreed that the simulator should be incorporated into residency training. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a role for the TURBT module of the Simbionix TURP Mentor simulator as an introduction to TURBT for urology trainees. Strong support was found from both experienced operators and novices for its formal inclusion in resident education.

Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes. METHODS: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship-and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting. RESULTS: An initial literature search of 945 articles (230 abstracts) underwent screening and yielded 24 preliminary techniques. Through sequential survey assessment and in-person discussion, a total of 11 strategies were approved. These are temporally distributed prior to tumor resection (five principles), during tumor resection (two principles), and during renorrhaphy (four principles). CONCLUSIONS: Given the variability in tumor size, depth, location, and vascularity, coupled with limitations of laparoscopic equipment, achieving consistent hemostasis in MIPN may be challenging. Despite over two decades of MIPN experience, limited evidence exists to guide clinicians. Through a three-step Delphi method and rigorous iterative review with a panel of experts, we ascertained a guiding checklist of principles for newly beginning and practicing urologists to reference.

Partial vs. radical nephrectomy and the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular, and nephrological outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The study's objective was to examine the effects of renal-preservation surgery on long-term mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, and renal-related outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all partial (n=575) and radical nephrectomies (n=882) for tumors ≤7 cm in diameter between 2002 and 2010 across three academic centers in Ontario, Canada. We linked records from provincial databases to assess patient characteristics and outcomes (median seven years' followup using retrospective data). A weighted propensity score was used to reduce confounding. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization with major cardiovascular events, non-cancer related mortality, kidney cancer-related mortality, and dialysis. RESULTS: Mean one-year postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 71 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the partial group and 52 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the radical group. Partial nephrectomy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the first five years after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.66), which did not extend beyond five years (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68-1.49). Kidney cancer-related mortality was lower in the partial compared to the radical group for the first four years after surgery (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.72). There were no significant differences between the groups for cardiovascular outcomes or non-cancer related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and cancer-specific survival was reduced in radical nephrectomy patients. However, despite reduced renal function in the radical nephrectomy group, non-cancer-related death, cardiovascular events, and dialysis were not significantly different between groups. Long-term benefits of partial nephrectomy may be less than previously believed.

A novel prevention bundle to reduce incisional infections after radical cystectomy.

PURPOSE: Our institution implemented a novel intervention bundle to reduce incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) for patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the bundle in reducing incisional SSIs post-cystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A before-after cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent radical cystectomy by urologic oncologists at The Ottawa Hospital from January 2016 to March 2019. Thirty-day postoperative incisional SSIs were identified from the medical record and were compared to institutionally collected National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. The SSI reduction strategy was implemented as of March 1st, 2018. Adjusted associations between the SSI intervention with the risk of incisional SSI were determined. Cystectomy incisional SSI rates were compared to all other National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-collected surgeries at The Ottawa Hospital during the same time period. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients were included; 41 following implementation of the SSI reduction bundle. Mean age was 69 years, 104 (79%) were male, and 59 (45%) received neobladders. The risk of incisional SSI decreased from 16.5% preintervention to 2.4% post intervention (risk ratio 0.17; P = 0.004). Intraoperative transfusion and diabetes were independently associated with an increased risk of incisional SSI (P < 0.05). The SSI rate for all other surgical procedures at our institution remained stable during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of SSI after radical cystectomy is high. Use of an SSI reduction bundle was associated with a large reduction in incisional SSIs. Further evaluation of this intervention in other centers is warranted.

Transplanting kidneys from donors with small renal masses - a strategy to expand the donor pool.

INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease, but organ demand continues to outstrip supply. The transplantation of kidneys from donors with small renal masses (SRMs) represents a potential avenue to expand the donor pool. We reviewed all published cases of transplants from donors with SRMs and we present followup data, best practices, and outline an actionable series of steps to guide the implementation of such transplants at individual centers. METHODS: A detailed literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and SCOPUS databases was performed. Thirty unique data sets met inclusion criteria and described the transplantation of tumor-ectomized kidneys; nine data sets described the transplantation of contralateral kidneys from donors with SRMs. RESULTS: A total of 147 tumorectomized kidneys have been transplanted. Pathology revealed 120 to be renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), of which 116 were stage T1a (0.3-4 cm). The mean followup time was 44.2 months (1-200). A single suspected tumor recurrence occurred in one patient nine years post-transplantation and it was managed with active surveillance. Twenty-seven kidneys have been transplanted from deceased donors with contralateral renal masses. Pathology revealed 25 to be RCCs, of which 19 were confirmed to be stage T1 (<7 cm). The mean followup time was 46.7 months (0.5-155). One recipient developed an RCC and underwent curative allograft nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Careful use of kidneys from donors with SRMs is feasible and safe, with an overall recurrence rate of less than 1.5%. The use of such kidneys could help alleviate the organ shortage crisis.

Long-term results of protocol kidney biopsy directing steroid withdrawal in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether protocol biopsies could be used to guide treatment and improve outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) patients. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2013, protocol biopsies were performed on SPK patients at 3-6 months and one year post-transplant. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor, anti-proliferative agent, and corticosteroid. Corticosteroid was withdrawn in negative early biopsies, maintained in subclinical/ borderline biopsies, and increased if Banff IB or greater rejection was identified. Endpoints included presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on biopsy at one year (IF/TA), rejection episodes, and renal and pancreas function at five years' followup. RESULTS: Forty-one SPK transplant patients were reviewed and a total of 75 protocol biopsies were identified. On early biopsy, 51% had negative biopsies, 44% had borderline rejection, and 5% had subclinical rejection. Renal and pancreas function were not significantly different at one, two, and five years post-transplant between negative vs. borderline early biopsy patients. No difference in the degree of IF/TA was found between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate protocol biopsies as an investigative tool prior to steroid withdrawal in SPK patients. Our study suggests that there are no detrimental functional or histological effects at five years post-transplant, despite weaning steroids in the negative biopsy group.

The Western snip, stitch, and tug hydrocelectomy: How I do it.

INTRODUCTION: Adult idiopathic hydrocele is a common benign disorder that merits surgical correction when symptomatic. The most popular techniques for repair are plication (Lord's procedure) or excision and eversion of the tunica vaginalis (Jaboulay procedure). Established complications from these traditional repairs include hematoma, recurrence, and infection. These procedures are performed through a scrotal incision. We describe a novel technique of hydrocele repair with gubernaculum preservation through a subinguinal incision. METHODS: The novel technique is described in detail. A retrospective review was performed of those patients treated by a single surgeon with the subinguinal technique. Demographic information, indication for treatment, success rate, and details regarding complications were collected. RESULTS: We term the technique the "Snip, Stitch & Tug" repair. Through a small subinguinal incision, the tunica is everted posterior to the spermatic cord and testis without resection of the hydrocele sac or division of the gubernaculum. Twelve patients with postoperative followup were identified. Eleven patients (92%) treated with the novel technique were cured. There was only one complication (superficial wound infection) recorded after this technique. CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic hydrocele repair with gubernaculum preservation can be easily and safely performed through a small subinguinal incision.

First Canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: Comparison with multi-incision technique.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the outcomes of single-incision, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. multiple-incision pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robotic system. METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive robotic pyeloplasties by a single surgeon from January 2011 to August 2015. A total of 30 procedures were performed (16 single:14 multi-port). Two different single-port devices were compared: the GelPort (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) and the Intuitive single-site access port (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. Mean operating time was similar among the single and multi-port groups (225.2 min vs. 198.9 minutes [p=0.33]). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay in either group (86.2 hr vs. 93.2 hr [p=0.76]). There was no difference in success rates or postoperative complications among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single-port robotic pyeloplasty is non-inferior to multiple-incision robotic surgery in terms of operative times, hospitalization time, success rates, and complications. Verifying these results with larger cohorts is required prior to the wide adoption of this technique. Ongoing objective measurements of cosmesis and patient satisfaction are being evaluated.

Measuring the Impact of Medical Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes Mellitus on Renal Functional Decline Following Surgical Management of Renal Masses.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for renal functional decline following extirpative renal surgery, and establish the relative impact of these factors on glomerular filtration rate (GFR). METHODS: We reviewed 224 consecutive patients with a normal contralateral kidney who underwent radical nephrectomy for a renal mass at a tertiary care center between 2002 and 2010. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of renal function. RESULTS: Mean patient age at time of surgery was 62.6 years and 58% of patients were male. On multivariate analysis, preoperative GFR and diabetes mellitus (DM) were independent predictors of 1-year postoperative renal function. Every 1.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) of preoperative GFR corresponded to a loss of 0.50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) following extirpative renal surgery. Diabetic patients had a further decrease in GFR of 4.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.6) compared to patients without DM. CONCLUSION: Preoperative GFR and DM were independent predictors of postoperative renal function. This may represent a proportion of patients with medical renal disease that is not identified on the basis of preoperative GFR alone.

Donation after Circulatory Death Renal Allografts--Does Donor Age Greater than 50 Years Affect Recipient Outcomes?

PURPOSE: Donation after circulatory death renal allografts are associated with excellent outcomes. We performed a retrospective chart review to investigate the impact of donor age on postoperative and intermediate term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared recipient outcomes of donation after circulatory death allografts from donors older vs younger than 50 years. A total of 118 single donations after circulatory death renal transplants were performed at our institution between July 2006 and September 2013. Outcome variables (creatinine clearance, readmission rate, length of hospital stay, delayed graft function, graft loss and rejection) were compared between the 2 age categories using the Student t-test and the Pearson chi-square test. Independent prognosticators of creatinine clearance at 12 months were assessed with multivariate linear regression modeling. RESULTS: Mean ± SD recipient age was 53.8 ± 14.7 years and 45.8% of donation after circulatory death donors were older than 50 years. Median followup was 21 months (range 1 to 87). Recipients of kidney transplants from donation after circulatory death donors older than 50 years demonstrated lower creatinine clearance at 1 month (mean 50.3 ± 25.3 vs 72.7 ± 31.7 ml per minute, p <0.001), 3 months (62.5 ± 22.9 vs 87.9 ± 36.4, p <0.001) and 1 year (66.2 ± 26.8 vs 87.8 ± 38.7, p = 0.013). However, the 2 groups did not differ with regard to delayed graft function, graft loss, hospital readmissions or length of hospital stay. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that donor age, recipient age, recipient gender and cold ischemia time were independent predictors of creatinine clearance at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of allografts from donors older than 50 years showed inferior renal function at 1 year but the 2 groups had similar graft survival and short-term outcomes. Longer followup is required to determine long-term allograft survival.

Donation after cardiac death pediatric en bloc renal transplantation.

PURPOSE: Use of small pediatric kidneys obtained from extremely young donors after cardiac death has been limited. This potential organ source remains under used by transplant teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all renal transplants at our institution from 2000 to 2013 to identify recipients of an en bloc pair of kidneys from deceased pediatric donors younger than 4 years. The outcomes of donation after cardiac death en bloc allografts were compared with neurological determination of death en bloc allografts. RESULTS: A total of 21 recipients of en bloc renal allografts were identified, of which 4 organ pairs were obtained through donation after cardiac death. Mean ± SD donor age was 20.6 ± 11.6 months and weight was 12.4 ± 3.7 kg. Delayed allograft function occurred in 2 of 4 recipients of allografts obtained from donation after cardiac death en bloc and 3 of 17 recipients of allografts from neurological determination of death en bloc. One year after transplantation mean ± SD glomerular filtration rates were similar, at 80.7 ± 15.3 and 85.7 ± 33.4 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) in the cardiac and neurological allograft groups, respectively (difference not significant). Surgical complications occurred in 3 patients, and no allograft was lost to thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: We report successful transplantation of a small cohort of pediatric en bloc kidneys obtained through donation after cardiac death from donors younger than 4 years. Outcomes at 1 year are comparable to those in neurological determination of death en bloc allograft recipients.