Prediction of structural and functional relationships of Repeat 1 of human interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) with other proteins.

PURPOSE: We compared the structure and function of interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) related proteins and predicted domain and secondary structure within each repeat of IRBP and its relatives. We tested whether tail specific protease (Tsp), which bears sequence similarity to IRBP Domain B, binds fatty acids or retinoids, and whether IRBP possessed protease activity resembling Tsp's catalytic function. These tests helped us to learn whether the primary sequence similarities of family members extended to higher order structural and functional levels. METHODS: Predictions derived from multiple sequence alignments among IRBP and Tsp family members and secondary structure computer programs were carried out. The first repeat of human IRBP (EcR1) and Tsp were expressed, purified, and tested for binding properties. Tsp was examined for fluorescence enhancement of retinol or 16-anthroyloxy-palmitic acid (16-AP) to test for ligand binding. IRBP was tested for protease activity. RESULTS: Tsp did not exhibit fluorescence enhancement with retinol or 16-AP. IRBP did not exhibit protease activity. The positions of critical residues needed for the ligand binding properties of retinol were predicted. Primary sequence and three-dimensional similarity was found between Domain A of IRBP Repeat 3 and eglin c. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence similarity of Tsp and IRBP raised the possibility that each might share the function of the other protein: IRBP might possess protease activity or Tsp might possess retinoid or fatty acid binding activity. Our studies do not support such a shared function hypothesis, and suggest that the sequence similarity is the result of maintenance of structure. The finding of similarity to eglin c in Domain A suggests the possibility of a tight interaction between Domain A and Domain B, possibly implying the need for Domain A in retinoid-binding, and suggesting that both Domains should be present in testing mutations. The positions of predicted critical amino acids suggest models in which a large binding pocket holds the retinoid or fatty acid ligand. These predictions are tested in a companion paper.

Effects of dispersed point substitutions in Repeat 1 of human interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of mutations on the retinol binding capability of human Repeat 1 of interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP). First, we predicted important functional amino acids by several computer programs. We also noted the lack of shared functions between Tail-specific protease (Tsp) and IRBP, which bear sequence similarity, and this aided in predicting functional residues. We analyzed the effects of point substitutions on the retinol and fatty acid binding properties of Repeat 1 of human IRBP at 25 and 50 degrees C. METHODS: To find residues critical to retinol binding that might affect function, a series of thirteen mutations were created by site-specific mutagenesis between positions 140 and 280 in Repeat 1 of human IRBP. These mutants were expressed, purified, and tested for binding properties. The conformations of the proteins were examined by circular dichroism (CD) scans. RESULTS: Seven of the mutations exhibited reduced binding capacity, and five were not expressed at high enough levels to assess binding activity. Four of the mutants were purified, and their CD scans were very similar to those of Repeat 1. Only one of the mutations did not affect binding, folding, or expression when compare to wild type Repeat 1. CONCLUSIONS: Several IRBP mutants containing point mutations retained native structure but lost retinol binding function. The data suggest that retinol binding is affected by many different amino acid substitutions in or near a binding pocket. That even a single point substitution can profoundly affect binding without affecting overall conformation suggests that much of Domain B (from amino acid positions 80 to 300) is involved with ligand binding. This excludes three previously proposed IRBP-retinol binding mechanisms: (1) retinol binds to a small portion of the protein repeat, (2) retinol can bind to any hydrophobic patch in the protein, and (3) native conformation is not required for retinol binding to the repeat.

G239T mutation in Repeat 1 of human IRBP: possible implications for more than one binding site in a single repeat.

PURPOSE: Interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein(IRBP) is a four-repeat protein found in the interphotoreceptor space. Each repeat can bind retinoids and fatty acids. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the single amino acid substitution, G239T, versus the wild type sequence of human IRBP Repeat 1, on ligand binding at equilibrium, ligand off rates, and protection of retinol from degradation. METHODS: G239T was created by site-specific mutagenesis, expressed in E. coli, and purified. E. coli expressed wild type Repeat 1 (EcR1) and G239T were subjected to thermal denaturation and analyzed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. We compared the ligand binding properties by fluorescence enhancement of retinol and 16-anthroyloxy-palmitate, tryptophan quenching of the proteins by different ligands, binding competition assays, protection of retinol from degradation, and stopped-flow kinetics to measure transfer of ligands to and from model membranes. RESULTS: Circular dichroism, fluorescence, and absorbance spectroscopy of G239T and EcR1 showed similar wavelength scans. G239T exhibited about three-fold less fluorescence of bound all-trans-retinol or 13-cis-retinol versus EcR1. Retinol quenching of intrinsic protein fluorescence was reduced by 37% in G239T versus EcR1. Other retinoids used as quenchers produced no difference between intrinsic protein fluorescence of either G239T or EcR1; all exhibited saturable high affinity binding to each protein. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) served as a competitive inhibitor of retinol fluorescence enhancement with EcR1. However, DHA did not alter retinol fluorescence with G239T. 16-anthroyloxy-palmitate (16-AP) exhibited about 30% higher levels of fluorescence enhancement when bound to G239T versus EcR1. EcR1 prevented oxidative damage of all-trans-retinol, whereas G239T provided much less protection. Each protein could accept 9-cis-retinal from small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) as measured by stopped flow kinetics. Off rates were the same in comparing G239T and EcR1 as acceptors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the general similarity in shape between G239T and EcR1 and the nearly identical binding behavior with some ligands, distinct differences exist in the ligand binding properties of G239T and EcR1. Fluorescence enhancement/quenching and retinol protection experiments suggest that retinol binding is reduced by about 50% in G239T versus EcR1. The data suggest that either: (1) EcR1 contains two binding sites for retinol and G239T has lost one site or (2) EcR1 has a single binding site that is altered in G239T to reduce retinol binding. Results of all the experiments were consistent with the first model while some of the data were not consistent with the second model. Thus, it is possible that position 239, found in Domain B2 of IRBP Repeat 1, is located in or near one of two retinol binding sites.

Distinct roles for cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins I and II in regulating signaling by retinoic acid.

The pleiotropic effects of retinoic acid (RA) in mammalian cells are mediated by two classes of proteins: the retinoic acid receptors (RAR) and cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins (CRABP-I and CRABP-II). Here we show that expression of CRABP-II, but not CRABP-I, markedly enhanced RAR-mediated transcriptional activation of a reporter gene in COS-7 cells. The equilibrium dissociation constants of complexes of CRABP-I or CRABP-II with RA were found to differ by 2-fold. It is thus unlikely that the distinct effects of the two proteins on transactivation stem from differential ligand-binding affinities. The mechanisms by which RA transfers from the CRABPs to RAR were thus investigated directly. The rate constant for movement of RA from CRABP-II, but not from CRABP-I, to RAR strongly depended on the concentration of the acceptor. The data suggest that transfer of RA from CRABP-I to RAR involves dissociation of the ligand from the binding protein, followed by association with the receptor. In contrast, movement of RA from CRABP-II to the receptor is facilitated by a mechanism that involves direct interactions between CRABP-II and RAR. These findings reveal a striking functional difference between CRABP-I and CRABP-II, and point at a novel mechanism by which the transcriptional activity of RA can be regulated by CRABP-II.

Ligand selectivity of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR alpha, beta, and gamma) are nuclear hormone receptors that play critical roles in regulating lipid metabolism. It is well established that PPARs are the targets for the hypolipidemic synthetic compounds known as peroxisome proliferators, and it has been proposed that various long-chain fatty acids and metabolites of arachidonic acid serve as the physiological ligands that activate these receptors in vivo. However, a persistent problem is that reported values of the equilibrium dissociation constants (Kds) of complexes of PPARs with these ligands are in the micromolar range, at least an order of magnitude higher than the physiological concentrations of the ligands. Thus, the identity of the endogenous ligands for PPAR remains unclear. Here we report on a fluorescence-based method for investigating the interactions of PPAR with ligands. It is shown that the synthetic fluorescent long-chain fatty acid trans-parinaric acid binds to PPARalpha with high affinity and can be used as a probe to monitor protein-ligand interactions by the receptor. Measurements of Kds characterizing the interactions of PPARalpha with various ligands revealed that PPARalpha interacts with unsaturated C:18 fatty acids, with arachidonic acid, and with the leukotriene LTB4 with affinities in the nanomolar range. These data demonstrate the utility of the optical method in examining the ligand-selectivity of PPARs, and resolve a long-standing uncertainty in understanding how the activities of these receptors are regulated in vivo.

Cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein ligand interactions. Gln-210 and Lys-221 are in the retinoid binding pocket.

Cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP) carries 11-cis-retinal and/or 11-cis-retinol as endogenous ligands in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Müller cells of the retina and has been linked with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Ligand interactions determine the physiological role of CRALBP in the RPE where the protein is thought to function as a substrate carrier for 11-cis-retinol dehydrogenase in the synthesis of 11-cis-retinal for visual pigment regeneration. However, CRALBP is also present in optic nerve and brain where its natural ligand and function are not yet known. We have characterized the interactions of retinoids with native bovine CRALBP, human recombinant CRALBP (rCRALBP) and five mutant rCRALBPs. Efforts to trap and/or identify a Schiff base in the dark, under a variety of reducing, denaturing, and pH conditions were unsuccessful, suggesting the lack of covalent interactions between CRALBP and retinoid. Buried and solvent-exposed lysine residues were identified in bovine CRALBP by reductive methylation of the holoprotein followed by denaturation and reaction with [3H]acetic anhydride. Radioactive lysine residues were identified by Edman degradation and electrospray mass spectrometry following proteolysis and purification of modified peptides. Human rCRALBP mutants K152A, K221A, and K294A were prepared to investigate possible retinoid interactions with buried or partially buried lysines. Two other rCRALBP mutants, I162V and Q210R, were also prepared to identify substitutions altering the retinoid binding properties of a random mutant. The structures of all the mutants were verified by amino acid and mass spectral analyses and retinoid binding properties evaluated by UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopy. All of the mutants bound 11-cis-retinal essentially like the wild type protein, indicating that the proteins were not grossly misfolded. Three of the mutants bound 9-cis-retinal like the wild type protein; however, Q210R and K221A bound less than stoichiometric amounts of the 9-cis-isomer and exhibited lower affinity for this retinoid relative to wild type rCRALBP. Residues Gln-210 and Lys-221 are located within a region of CRALBP exhibiting sequence homology with the ligand binding cavity of yeast phosphatidylinositol-transfer protein. The data implicate Gln-210 and Lys-221 as components of the CRALBP retinoid binding cavity and are discussed in the context of ligand interactions in structurally or functionally related proteins with known crystallographic structures.

The nucleotide sequence of the coat protein gene and 3' untranslated region of azuki bean mosaic potyvirus, a member of the bean common mosaic virus subgroup.

The relationship of azuki bean mosaic potyvirus (AzMV) to members of the bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) subgroup has been unclear. Degenerate oligonucleotide primers and the polymerase chain reaction were used to amplify and clone the coat protein (CP) gene and 3' untranslated region (UTR) of AzMV. The deduced amino acid sequence of the CP is 94% identical to that of dendrobium mosaic virus, establishing the two as strains of the same virus. While the CP amino acid identities between AzMV and potyviruses of the BCMV species are at or below 90%, the 91 to 94% identity between their UTRs suggests that AzMV could be considered a strain of BCMV. Interestingly, the grouping of potyviruses within the greater BCMV subgroup on a coat protein amino acid tree correlates with a grouping based on the response elicited on bean containing the I gene for resistance to BCMV.